Cited by 11Smoking Behavior and CessationBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Smokers with bipolar disorder, other affective disorders, and no mental health conditions: Comparison of baseline characteristics and success at quitting in a large 12-month behavioral intervention randomized trial.

Open access
Heffner, Jaimee L., Mull, Kristin E., Watson, Noreen L., McClure, Jennifer B., Bricker, Jonathan B.·2018·Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Abstract

Background: The extent to which smokers with bipolar disorder (BD) differ from other smokers on cessation-related characteristics and outcomes is unknown and could improve knowledge of treatment needs for this group. These analyses compared smokers with BD versus smokers with other affective disorders (ADs; anxiety and unipolar depression) and smokers with no mental health conditions (MHCs).Method: Participants (n = 2570) were a subsample of those enrolled in a smoking cessation trial comparing two web-delivered intervention approaches: acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) and cognitive behavioral therapy. Those included in this analysis self-reported having BD (n = 221), other ADs (n = 783) or no major MHCs (n = 1566). Surveys assessed baseline characteristics and self-reported abstinence at 3, 6, and 12-months post-randomization. Treatment utilization was tracked via page views.Results: Smokers with BD were distinct from both AD and no MHC smokers on the majority of baseline characteristics. At 12-months, quit rates were lower for smokers with BD (20%) than no MHCs (29%; p = 0.01), but no different than other ADs (20%; p = .467). Interactions between treatment assignment and diagnostic group were non-significant for cessation outcome. The number of logins was higher for smokers with BD than AD in the ACT arm only (p = .001), but this finding was not replicated across other utilization indicators.Conclusions: Smokers with BD and other ADs had similar long-term quit rates despite numerous differences in baseline characteristics. Despite being lower than for smokers without MHCs, long-term quit rates from web-based treatment are promising for smokers with BD as well as other ADs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.08.034

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

8 of 20 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Research on the treatment needs and outcomes of quit attempts among smokers with bipolar disorder is limited.

    “Despite these known disparities in tobacco smoking and its health consequences for people with BD, there is limited research on the treatment needs and outcomes of quit attempts for this group of smokers.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Ziedonis et al., 2008 source

      The Suggestions for future research section (page unavailable) says smoking-cessation studies in people with mental disorders have generally used small samples and calls for research on adapting treatments to different psychiatric populations. That supports a general research gap, but our copy does not specifically assess treatment needs or quit-attempt outcomes among smokers with bipolar disorder. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Six of eight published smoking-cessation studies in people with bipolar disorder had samples of twenty or fewer.

    “Six of eight published studies focused on smoking cessation for people with BD have sample sizes of twenty or less”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Brunette et al., 2018 source
    • cites Chengappa et al., 2014 source
    • cites Evins et al., 2014 source

      The Results report 18 participants with bipolar disorder in this trial, but do not count published bipolar-disorder smoking-cessation studies or compare their sample sizes. Searches for the claimed six-of-eight figure and for prior bipolar-disorder studies with samples of 20 or fewer found no passage addressing it. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Previous work found greater discrepancy between self-reported and cotinine-confirmed abstinence among individuals with depressive symptoms.

    “our previous work demonstrated greater discrepancy between self-reported and cotinine-confirmed smoking abstinence among individuals with depressive symptoms (Heffner et al., 2017)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heffner et al., 2017 source
  • Findingown data

    None of the mediation analyses showed statistically significant relationships among predictor, mediator, and outcome.

    “None of the mediation analyses demonstrated statistically significant relationships among all three variables (predictor, mediator, and outcome)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In the ACT arm, the other affective disorder group had fewer days logged in than the no mental health condition group.

    “In the ACT arm, the AD group had a lower number of days logged in than the no MHC group (p<.001, IRR=0.74, 95% CI=0.64–0.87)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 12
  • May combine two claims. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    Validated mental health screeners were administered at baseline for depression, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, social anxiety, and at-risk drinking.

    “Validated mental health screeners administered at baseline covered depression [CES-D (Radloff 1977); positive screen is ≥16], generalized anxiety [GAD-7 (Spitzer et al., 2006); positive screen is ≥ 10], panic disorder [ANSQ (Stein et al., 1999)]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Radloff 1977 source
    • cites Spitzer et al., 2006 source
    • cites Stein et al., 1999 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    It is likely that some participants who self-reported a mental health disorder would not meet diagnostic criteria and some who did not self-report one would meet criteria.

    “it is likely that some proportion of participants in the study who self-reported mental health disorders would not meet diagnostic criteria and that some of those who did not self-report a disorder would, in fact, meet the criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sanchez-Villegas et al., 2008 source

      The Results report 46 true positives among 62 participants who self-reported depression and 34 true negatives among 42 who did not, demonstrating both kinds of misclassification for depression. The source validates self-reported depression in its own cohort, not mental health disorders generally or the participants in the citing study. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Depression has been associated with lower use of some cessation treatments, including behavioral and pharmacotherapy interventions.

    “Although depression has been linked to lower utilization of some cessation treatments, including both behavioral (Zeng et al., 2015) and pharmacotherapy (Hood et al., 2013) interventions”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Zeng et al., 2015 source
    • cites Hood et al., 2013 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Commitment to Quitting Smoking Scale and the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale were used to measure commitment to abstinence and smoking-specific experiential avoidance.

    “participants completed the Commitment to Quitting Smoking Scale (CQSS) (Kahler et al., 2007) as a measure of commitment to achieving abstinence and the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS) (Gifford et al., 2004) as a measure of smoking-specific experiential avoidance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kahler et al., 2007 source
    • cites Gifford et al., 2004 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Smokers with bipolar disorder were more likely to screen positive for current mental health conditions than both comparison groups, except that panic-disorder likelihood was similar to the other affective disorder group.

    “They were also more likely to screen positive for current mental health conditions than both comparison groups, with the exception of a similar likelihood of panic disorder in BD and AD.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    On acceptance of internal smoking cues, smokers with bipolar disorder scored lower than the no mental health condition group but did not differ significantly from the other affective disorder group.

    “the smokers with BD scored lower than the no MHC group but were not significantly different from the AD group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Smokers with bipolar disorder reported greater exposure to other smokers than smokers without mental health conditions, but were similar to the other affective disorder group on living with a smoker.

    “they reported generally greater exposure to other smokers (i.e., close friends, adult smokers in home) than smokers with no MHCs, but they were similar to the AD group on living with a smoker—either a partner or other adult in the household.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the ACT arm, the bipolar disorder group did not differ significantly from either the no mental health condition group or the other affective disorder group on days logged in.

    “but the BD group did not differ significantly from either the no MHC group (p=.064, IRR=0.79, 95% CI=0.62–1.02) or the AD group (p=.635, IRR=1.06, 95% CI=0.82–1.40).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Compared with both comparison groups, smokers with bipolar disorder were younger and more likely to be unmarried, not working, and identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual.

    “Relative to both comparison groups, smokers with BD were younger and more likely to be unmarried, not working, and identify as lesbian, gay, or bisexual (LGB).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The bipolar disorder subgroup had significantly lower quit rates than the no mental health condition group on the primary 12-month outcome and on all other 12-month cessation outcomes.

    “the BD subgroup did have significantly lower quit rates than the no MHC group on the primary outcome of 30-day PPA at 12-months post-randomization (as well as all of the other cessation outcomes at 12-months).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Cessation differences between bipolar disorder and no mental health conditions were present at long-term follow-up but not at 3 months.

    “differences in cessation outcomes between smokers with BD and no MHC were present at long-term follow-up, but not at the earliest follow-up of 3 months post-randomization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The 8% prevalence of self-reported bipolar disorder in this sample is consistent with national data indicating about 9% of current adult smokers in the US have bipolar disorder.

    “the 8% (221/2637) prevalence of self-reported bipolar disorder among smokers in this sample is consistent with national-level data indicating that there are an estimated 3.5 million adults with bipolar disorder in the US who smoke”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lasser et al., 2000 source
    • cites Merikangas et al., 2007 source
    • cites US Census Bureau, 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Biochemical verification of smoking abstinence is generally considered unnecessary in population-level interventions without face-to-face contact.

    “Generally, biochemical verification of smoking abstinence is considered unnecessary in population-level interventions with no face-to-face contact (SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the analyses were post hoc and exploratory, multiple testing was not controlled except for familywise error rate.

    “Due to the post hoc, exploratory nature of the analyses, we did not control for multiple testing with the exception of controlling for familywise error rate as described previously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Self-reported cessation outcomes are recommended for large population-based cessation trials with no face-to-face contact, minimal demand characteristics, and infeasible biochemical confirmation due to sample size.

    “Self-reported cessation outcomes are recommended for large population-based cessation trials where there is no face-to-face contact, demand characteristics are minimal, and biochemical confirmation is not feasible due to sample size (SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification, 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Epidemiologic data suggest that smokers with bipolar disorder may have lower quit rates than smokers without mental health conditions.

    “Although epidemiologic data suggest that quit rates may be lower for smokers with BD than for smokers without MHCs (17% of ever smokers with BD report being former smokers vs. 43% of ever smokers without MHC) (Lasser et al., 2000)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lasser et al., 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Baseline demographic and smoking variables were included as covariates in models if they differed by diagnostic group and were associated with the outcome.

    “Baseline demographic and smoking variables were included in the models as covariates if they differed by diagnostic group and were associated with the outcome (i.e., cessation or treatment utilization).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence was used to measure nicotine dependence severity.

    “participants completed the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (Heatherton et al., 1991) as a measure of nicotine dependence severity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Heatherton et al., 1991 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Follow-up rates were 88% at 3 months, 89% at 6 months, and 88% at 12 months.

    “Follow-up rates were 88% (2274/2570) at 3 months, 89% (2283/2570) at 6 months, and 88% (2249/2570) at 12-months.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Because the study was exploratory and used a less conservative method for Type I error, the conclusions are preliminary.

    “given the exploratory nature of the study, we used a less conservative method of controlling for Type I error stemming from multiple testing (i.e., control for familywise Type I error via the false discovery rate, or FDR), and our conclusions are best characterized as preliminary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    This is the first demonstration with a digital cessation intervention that smokers with bipolar disorder and those with other affective disorders have similar quit rates despite baseline differences.

    “This is also the first demonstration with any digital intervention for cessation that smokers with BD and those with other ADs have similar quit rates, despite smokers with BD differing from smokers with other ADs on a number of different demographics, smoking, and mental health characteristics at baseline.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: No prior study had compared treatment-seeking smokers with bipolar disorder to those without mental health conditions or with other affective disorders on demographic, smoking, and other cessation-relevant characteristics.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Promising quit rates, about 20% at one year, can be achieved in smokers with bipolar disorder and other affective disorders using web-based interventions, even though these rates are lower than for smokers without mental health conditions.

    “It also suggests that promising quit rates (i.e., 20% quit rates at one year) can be achieved in both smokers with BD and other ADs using web-based interventions, even if those rates are lower than for smokers without MHCs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
22 of 22
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The link between bipolar disorder and lower quit rates had not been directly tested in a prospective cessation study.

    “Although epidemiologic data suggest that quit rates may be lower for smokers with BD than for smokers without MHCs (17% of ever smokers with BD report being former smokers vs. 43% of ever smokers without MHC) (Lasser et al., 2000), this has not been tested directly in a prospective cessation study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Whether smokers with bipolar disorder use cessation interventions less than other smokers had not been examined.

    “there has not been any examination of whether smokers with BD demonstrate lower utilization of cessation interventions”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No prior study had compared treatment-seeking smokers with bipolar disorder to those without mental health conditions or with other affective disorders on demographic, smoking, and other cessation-relevant characteristics.

    “there have been no comparisons of how treatment-seeking smokers with BD may differ from smokers without MHCs or smokers with other ADs (including unipolar depression and anxiety disorders) on demographic, smoking, and other characteristics relevant to cessation.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • False discovery rate is described as familywise error control

    Minor

    The methods identify the adjustment as controlling the false discovery rate, but the discussion calls that same approach control of the familywise Type I error rate. These are different error-rate criteria.

  • Reported exclusions exceed the difference between trial and analysis samples

    Minor

    The trial had 2,637 participants and the analysis included 2,570, leaving 67 excluded. The exclusions statement identifies 119 participants with alcohol abuse alone as excluded, already more than the 67 available exclusions.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heffner, J. L., Mull, K. E., Watson, N. L., McClure, J. B., & Bricker, J. B.
Affiliations
  • Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Heffner, Jaimee L.
Venue
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-12
Volume
193
Pages
35-41
ISSN
0376-8716 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2896378055
Cited by
11
References
52
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2
FWCI
0.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Drug and Alcohol Dependence (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (R01CA166646)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
bipolar disorder, smoking cessation, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, major depressive disorder, acceptance and commitment therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, quit rates, treatment utilization, mental illness
MeSH terms
Smokers, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Bipolar Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Case-Control Studies, Smoking Cessation, Mood Disorders, Young Adult, Self Report, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review