The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semantics, Culture, and Cognition: Universal Human Concepts in Culture-Specific Configurations
Abstract
To what extent are languages ‘essentially the same’? Is every word in our language translatable into every other language, or are some of our words and concepts ‘culture specific’? In this innovative study, Wierzbicka ranges across a wide variety of languages and cultures, attempting to identify concepts which are truly universal, while at the same time arguing that every language constitutes a different ‘guide to reality’. The lexicons of different languages, she shows, do indeed suggest different conceptual universes. Not everything that can be said in one language can be said in another, and this is not just a matter of certain things being easier to say in one language than in another. Wierzbicka focuses on a few specific classes of words. One chapter looks at the language of emotion across cultures, and finds that there are numerous culture-specific words for feelings and emotions which have no analogues in other cultures. Another chapter considers moral concepts across cultures. A third examines names and titles. In her concluding chapter, Wierzbicka analyses the ways in which the Russian language and Australian English serve as mirrors of their respective cultures and ‘national characters’. Clearly and accessibly written, this important new study will be of great interest to scholars working in a wide range of disciplines, including linguistics, anthropology, philosophy, psychology and literary studies.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Much variation in norms and institutions is deeply embedded in the vocabulary and syntax of languages (Wierzbicka 1992).”
From Cultural group selection plays an essential role in explaining human cooperation: a sketch of the evidence. (2016) · cites this paper as Wierzbicka 1992
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kramsch, C. (2014) · AILA Review · doi:10.1075/aila.27.02kra · Cited by 1,539
Peeters, B. (1998) · Language · doi:10.2307/417582 · Cited by 1,369
Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity
Hammack, P. L. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308316892 · Cited by 923
Lindquist, K. A., Satpute, A. B., Wager, T. D., Weber, J., & Barrett, L. F. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv001 · Cited by 713
Richerson, P., Baldini, R., Bell, A. V., Demps, K., Frost, K., Hillis, V., Mathew, S., Newton, E. K., Naar, N., Newson, L., et al. (2016) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x1400106x · Cited by 639
Metadata
- Authors
- Wierzbicka, A.
- Corresponding author
- Wierzbicka, Anna
- ORCID
- Wierzbicka, Anna
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York, NY
- Published
- 1992-10-22
- OpenAlex
- W4388117266
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 54 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 148 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 5.93
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language and Culture
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
- Keywords
- cross-cultural semantics, culture-specific concepts, conceptual universals, vocabulary, emotional words, moral concepts, Russian language, Australian English, language and culture, cognitive linguistics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review