Cited by 426Phonetics and Phonology ResearchEmotion and Mood RecognitionNeuroscience and Music Perception

Vocal Expression Of Emotion

Scherer, Klaus R, Johnstone,, Tom, Klasmeyer, Gundrun·2002·Handbook of Affective Sciences

Abstract

This chapter reviews theoretical models and empirical evidence on the effects of emotion on vocalization, in particular on human speech. Of all expressive manifestations of emotional arousal, vocalization represents the most phylogenetically continuous modality. The neural control structures, the voice production mechanisms, and the characteristics of vocal emotion signals are comparable across many species of mammals, including humans (Hauser, 1996; Marler & Tenaza, 1977; Morton, 1977; Scherer, 1985; see chapter 24, this volume). In consequence, the study of emotional vocalization constitutes a prime tool to investigate the relationships between the physiological production of affect vocalization and its use as a signal in social interaction and communication. The basis for the following discussion is a modified version of the Brunswikian lens model (Figure 23.1; see also Kappas, Hess, & Scherer, 1991; Scherer, 1978, 1982). This model allows one to clearly distinguish between the expression (or encoding) of emotion on the sender side, the transmission of the sound, and the impression (or decoding) on the receiver side, resulting in emotion inference or attribution. Consequently, the model encourages research on the complete process of emotion communication by (1) determining which distal characteristics of the sound wave emerging from the mouth of an affectively aroused speaker (i.e., the acoustic parameters) are produced by the underlying emotion, (2) determining how these cues are transmitted from sender to receiver through the vocal-acousticauditory channel, and (3) determining how these proximal cues (the representation of the distal voice characteristics in the sensorium and the central nervous system) are used by the receiver to infer the emotion of the sender. As will be shown, most research in this area has focused either on encoding or decoding. Our aim in organizing the chapter by a model that charts the entire process is to encourage future research to attend to all of these aspects and their interrelationships.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oso/9780195126013.003.0023

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Scherer, K. R., Johnstone, & Klasmeyer, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Reading (GB)
Venue
Handbook of Affective Sciences
Published
2002-12-19
Pages
433-456
OpenAlex
W2774090594
Cited by
426
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 45 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
20.25
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
vocal emotion expression, emotional communication, emotion encoding, emotion decoding, acoustic cues, phonation, emotion inference, emotion attribution, social communication, mammalian vocalizations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review