The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Why? The Purpose of the Universe
Abstract
Western thought has been dominated by the dichotomy of traditional religion and secular atheism. But do we have to choose between these options? Philip Goff argues that it is time to move on from both God and atheism. Through an exploration of contemporary cosmology, as well as cutting-edge philosophical research on the nature of consciousness, Goff argues for cosmic purpose: the idea that the universe is directed towards certain goals, such as the emergence of intelligent life. However, in contrast to religious thinkers, Goff argues that the Omni-God (defined as all-knowing, all-powerful, and perfectly good) is a bad explanation of cosmic purpose. Instead, we explore a range of alternative possibilities for accounting for cosmic purpose. Perhaps our universe was created by an evil or morally indifferent designer, or a designer with limited abilities. Perhaps we live in a computer simulation. Maybe cosmic purpose is rooted not in a conscious mind but in natural tendencies towards the good, or laws of nature with purposes built into them. Or maybe the universe is itself a conscious mind which directs itself towards certain goals. Goff scrutinises these options with analytic rigour, laying the groundwork for a new paradigm of philosophical enquiry into the middle ground between God and atheism. The final chapter outlines a way of living in hope that cosmic purpose is still unfolding, involving political engagement and a non-literalist interpretation of traditional religion.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As I have argued previously (Goff, 2023), even if there are theoretical reasons for taking heterogenous eternal inflation seriously, if we need to construe the evidence as our bubble universe is fine-tuned, and our bubble universe being fine-tuned is more likely on homogenous eternal inflation than heterogenous eternal inflation, then we are forced to conclude that the evidence supports the former”
From Is the fine-tuning evidence for a multiverse? (2024) · cites this paper as Goff, 2023
Citations
Cites
Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems
Guth, A. H. (1981) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.347 · Cited by 9,983
Panpsychism and Panprotopsychism
Chalmers, D. J. (2016) · Panpsychism · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199359943.003.0002 · Cited by 432
Why panpsychism doesn’t help us explain consciousness
Goff, P. (2009) · dialectica · doi:10.1111/j.1746-8361.2009.01196.x · Cited by 163
Self-citationThe Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe
Collins, R. (2009) · The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology · doi:10.1002/9781444308334.ch4 · Cited by 116
The Leibnizian Cosmological Argument
Pruss, A. R. (2009) · The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology · doi:10.1002/9781444308334.ch2 · Cited by 70
Did the universe design itself?
Goff, P. (2019) · International Journal for Philosophy of Religion · doi:10.1007/s11153-018-9692-z · Cited by 62
Self-citationA Reasonable Little Question: A Formulation of the Fine-Tuning Argument
Barnes, L. A. (2019) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0006.042 · Cited by 55
Cosmopsychism, Micropsychism and the Grounding Relation
Goff, P. (2019) · The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism · doi:10.4324/9781315717708-13 · Cited by 42
Self-citationIn Defense of the Requirement of Total Evidence
Draper, P. (2020) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/706084 · Cited by 32
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 175
- 2002, The Salmon of Doubt
- Albert, David Z. (1996) ‘Elementary Quantum Metaphysics’, in J. T. Cushing, A. Fine, & S. Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Mechanics: An Appraisal, Kluwer, 277–84. · DOI
- 1920, Space, Time, and Deity
- Alston, William P. (1996) ‘Some (Temporarily) Final Thoughts on the Evidential Arguments from Evil’, in Daniel Howard-Snyder (ed.), The Evidential Argument from Evil, Indiana University Press, 311–32.
- 2015, Consciousness in the Physical World: Essays on Russellian Monism
- Therapeutic Effects of Classic Serotonergic Psychedelics: A Systematic Review of Modern-era Clinical Studies,, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- 1972, Science
- 1983, What Is a Law of Nature?
- 1936, Language, Truth and Logic
- 1988, A Cognitive Theory of Consciousness
- 2011, Cognitive Phenomenology
- 2006, Better Never to Have Been
- 2017, The Human Predicament
- 2005, The Dispositionalist Conception of Laws, Foundations of Science
- 1997, The God We Never Knew: Beyond Dogmatic Religion to a More Authentic Contemporary Faith
- 2003, Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?, Philosophical Quarterly
- 2009, Multiple Universes and Observation Selection Effects, American Philosophical Quarterly
- 2016, Panpsychism: Contemporary Perspectives
- 2018, Taking Psychedelics Seriously, Journal of Palliative Medicine
- 1942, Le Mythe de Sisyphe
- 2016, The Big Picture: On the Origins of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself
- 2019, Something Deeply Hidden: Quantum Worlds and the Emergence of Spacetime
- 1983, How the Laws of Physics Lie
- 1995, Facing Up to the Problem of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 1996, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory
- 2018, The Meta-Problem of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2022, Reality+: Virtual Reality and the Problems of Philosophy
- 2020, The Idea of the Brain: A History
- 2012, Mental Chemistry: Combination for Panpsychists, Dialectica
- 2016, Panpsychism and Neutral Monism: How to Make Up One’s Mind
- 2005, Problems with the Argument from Fine-Tuning, Synthese
- 1991, The Existence of God and the Beginning of the Universe, Truth
- 1996, Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: An Appraisal
- Psychophysical Harmony: A New Argument for Theism
- 1859, Letter No. 2532, Charles Darwin to John Lubbock, Darwin Correspondence Project
- 2006, The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?
- 1986, The Blind Watchmaker
- 2014, Consciousness and the Brain: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts
- 179Dennett, Daniel (1994) ‘Real Consciousness’, in Antti Revonsuo & Matti Kamppinen (eds.), Consciousness in Philosophy and Cognitive Neuroscience, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 55–63.
- 2007, Probabilistic Arguments for Multiple Universes, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly
- 2022, Atheism and Agnosticism
- Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., & Zanghì, N. (1997) ‘Bohmian Mechanics and the Meaning of the Wave Function’, in R. S. Cohen, M. Horne, & J. Stachel (eds.), Experimental Metaphysics—Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony, vol. 1: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 193.
- 2016, Illusionism as a Theory of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- The Future of Illusion
- 2006, Experiences Don’t Sum, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- Goff, Philip (2013) ‘Orthodox Property Dualism + Linguistic Theory of Vagueness = Panpsychism’, in R. Brown (ed.), Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience, Springer, 75–91. · DOI
- 2017, Consciousness and Fundamental Reality
- 2018, Conscious Thought and the Cognitive Fine-Tuning Problem, Philosophical Quarterly
- 2019, Galileo’s Error: Foundations for a New Science of Consciousness
- 2020, Panpsychism and Free Will, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society
- 2021, Putting Consciousness First, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2022, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
- 180Goff, Philip (2023) ‘Quantum Mechanics and the Consciousness Constraint’, in S. Gao (ed.), Quantum Mechanics and Consciousness, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- How Exactly Does Panpsychism Explain Consciousness?
- 2022, Is Consciousness Everywhere? Essays on Panpsychism
- 2009, Reasons from Within: Desires and Values
- Goldstein, Sheldon & Stefan Teufel (2001) ‘Quantum Spacetime without Observers: Ontological Clarity and the Conceptual Foundations of Quantum Gravity’, in C. Callender & N. Huggett (eds.), Physics Meets Philosophy at the Planck Scale, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- 2011, The Hidden Reality: Parallel Universes and the Deep Laws of the Cosmos
- 2000, Inflation and Eternal Inflation, Physics Reports
- 1987, The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy: The Argument from Design. The Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes, Mind
- 2019, Interpretations of Probability
- 1988, A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes
- Hawthorne, John & Daniel Nolan (2006) ‘What Would Teleological Causation Be?’, in John Hawthorne (ed.), Metaphysical Essays, Oxford University Press, 265–84. · DOI
- 1989, An Interpretation of Religion: Human Responses to the Transcendent
- 2019, The Case Against Reality: How Evolution Hid the Truth from Our Eyes
- 2000, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Hume, David (1753/1882/1964) ‘Of National Characters’, in T. H. Green and T. H. Grose (eds.), The Philosophical Works (London, 1882; repr. Darmstadt, 1964), 253.
- 1982, Epiphenomenal Qualia, The Philosophical Quarterly
- 1896, The Will to Believe, The New World
- 1890, Principles of Psychology
- 1902, The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature
- 1974, Sentience and Behaviour, Mind
- 2013, Phenomenal Intentionality
- Landsman, Klaas (2016) ‘The Fine-Tuning Argument: Exploring the Improbability of Our Own Existence’, in K. Landsman and E. van Wolde (eds.), The Challenge of Chance Springer, 111–29. · DOI
- 2011, The Wonder of Consciousness: Understanding the Mind Through Philosophical Reflection
- 2000, Chalmers on the Addition of Consciousness to the Physical World, Philosophical Studies
- 2010, The Evil-God Challenge, Religious Studies
- 2018, Moral Naturalism
- 1989, Universes
- 1983, New Work for a Theory of Universals, Australasian Journal of Philosophy
- 2016, A Fortunate Universe: Life in a Finely-Tuned Cosmos
- 1988, Two Treatises of Government
- 1955, Evil and Omnipotence, Mind
- 1982, The Miracle of Theism
- 2009, Critique of Hegel’s ‘Philosophy of the Right
- 2019, Philosophy of Physics: Quantum Theory
- 2010, Skeptical Theism, Philosophy Compass
- 2013, The Neo-Russellian Ignorance Hypothesis: A Hybrid Account of Phenomenal Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2001, Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View, Mind
- 2019, Consciousness Science Underdetermined: A Short History of Endless Debates, Ergo
- 2022, Consciousness and the Prefrontal Cortex: A Review, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2019, Chemical Evidence for the Use of Multiple Psychotropic Plants in a 1,000-Year-Old Ritual Bundle from South America, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
- 2018, Does Neuroscience Leave Room for Free Will?, Trends in Neuroscience
- 1993, Principia Ethica
- 2017, The Evolutionary Argument for Phenomenal Powers, Philosophical Perspectives
- 2019, Is the Integrated Information Theory of Consciousness Compatible with Russellian Panpsychism?, Erkenntnis
- 2020, The Phenomenal Powers View and the Meta-Problem of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2015, Purpose in the Universe: The Moral and Metaphysical Case for Ananthropocentric Purposivism
- 2004, Laws in Nature
- 2002, The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice
- 1974, What Is It Like to Be a Bat?, The Philosophical Review
- 2012, Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist, Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature is Almost Certainly False
- 2013, The Wave Function: Essays on the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics
- Nida-Rümelin, Martine (2009) ‘An Argument from Transtemporal Identity for Subject-Body Dualism’, in Robert C. Koons & George Bealer (eds.), The Waning of Materialism: New Essays, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2001, The Gay Science
- 1974, Anarchy, State, and Utopia
- 2014, Moral Error Theory: History, Critique, Defence
- 1968, George Orwell: In Front of Your Nose,
- 2003, Libertarianism without Inequality
- 1923, The Idea of the Holy
- 1802, Natural Theology: Or Evidences of the Existence of the Deity Collected From the Appearances of Nature
- Papineau, David (2001) ‘The Rise of Physicalism’, in Carl Gillett & Barry Loewer (eds.), Physicalism and its Discontents, Cambridge University Press, 3–36. · DOI · Paper page
- Parfit, Derek (1998) ‘Why Anything? Why This?’, London Review of Books, 22 January, 24–7.
- 2010, Do Theories of Consciousness Rest on a Mistake?, Philosophical Issues
- Pautz, Adam (2013) ‘Does Phenomenology Ground Mental Content?’, in Uriah Kriegel (ed.), Phenomenal Intentionality, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2020, Consciousness and Coincidence: Comments on Chalmers, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2021, The Social Nature of Mitochondria: Implications for Human Health, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Pigden, C. R. (2009) ‘If Not Non-Cognitivism, Then What?’, in C. R. Pigden (ed.), Hume on Motivation and Virtue, Philosophers in Depth, Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- 2011, Optimal Taxation of Top Labor Incomes: A Tale of Three Elasticities
- 2014, Capital in the Twenty-First Century
- 2020, Capital and Ideology
- 2022, A Brief History of Equality
- 1974, The Nature of Necessity
- 1977, God, Freedom, and Evil
- Plantinga, Alvin (1985) ‘Self-Profile’, in James E. Tomberlin & Peter van Inwagen (eds.), Alvin Plantinga, D. Reidel, 3–97. · DOI
- 2021, Dr Goff, Tear Down This Wall! The Interface Theory of Perception and the Science of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 1840, Qu’est-ce que la propriété? ou, Recherche sur le principe du Droit et du Gouvernement
- 2019, How Reason Can Lead to God: A Philosopher’s Bridge to Faith
- 2020, Is God the Best Explanation of Things? A Dialogue
- 2000, Just Six Numbers: the Deep Forces that Shape the Universe
- 2019, Epiphenomenal Mind: An Integrated Outlook on Sensations, Beliefs, and Pleasure
- 2019, Combining Minds: How to Think About Composite Subjectivity
- 1982, The Ethics of Liberty
- 1979, The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism, American Philosophical Quarterly
- 1927, The Analysis of Matter
- 1989, The Persistent Problem of Evil, Faith and Philosophy
- 2019, A Teleological Strategy for Solving the Meta-problem of Consciousness, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- Schneider, Susan (2017) ‘Idealism, or Something Near Enough’, in Kenny Pearce & Tyron Goldschmidt (eds.), Idealism: New Essays in Metaphysics, Oxford University Press. · DOI
- 2019, Artificial You: AI and the Future of Your Mind
- 2007, Slaves of the Passions
- 2018, Religious Fictionalism, Philosophy Compass
- 2020, The Routledge Handbook of Panpsychism
- 2021, Being You: A New Science of Consciousness
- 2022, Assembly Theory Explains and Quantifies the Emergence of Selection and Evolution
- 2019, Who Owns England? How We Lost Our Green and Pleasant Land, and How to Take It Back
- 2011, Writing the Book of the World
- 1989, Our Place in the Universe: A Metaphysical Discussion
- 1994, The Moral Problem
- 1997, The Life of the Cosmos
- Sober, Elliott (2003) ‘The Design Argument’, in Neil A. Manson (ed.), God and Design: The Teleological Argument and Modern Science, Routledge, 27–54. · DOI
- 2009, Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence: Evidential Transitivity in Connection with Fossils, Fishing, Fine-Tuning and Firing Squads, Philosophical Studies
- 1994, An Essay on Rights
- 2001, Two Conceptions of the Physical, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 1987, Realism and Causation, The Philosophical Quarterly
- 1994, The Impossibility of Moral Responsibility, Philosophical Studies
- 2006, Realistic Monism: Why Physicalism Entails Panpsychism, Journal of Consciousness Studies
- 2014, The Secret Connection: Causation, Realism, and David Hume, Revised Edition
- 2017, Unbelievable Errors: An Error Theory about All Normative Judgements
- 2005, The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design
- 2004, The Existence of God
- 2014, Our Mathematical Universe: My Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality
- 1955, The Phenomenon of Man
- 2015, The Problem of Evil
- 2016, Integrated Information Theory: From Consciousness to Its Physical Substrate, Nature Reviews Neuroscience
- 1950, Computing Machinery and Intelligence, Mind
- 2000, Left-Libertarianism and Its Critics: The Contemporary Debate
- 2018, Cognitivism versus Non-Cognitivism
- 2012, The Emergent Multiverse
- The Mind-Body Problem and Metaphysics
- 2000, Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes, Noûs
- 1981, Internal and External Reasons
- 1989, Making Sense of Humanity
- 2010, Philosophical Investigations
- 1984, International Journal for Philosophy of Religion
- 2073, A Time Traveller’s Guide to the Future
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Testing the Conjecture That Quantum Processes Create Conscious Experience
Neven, H., Read, P., Kosik, K. S., Van der Molen, T., Bouwmeester, D., Bodnia, E., Turin, L., & Koch, C. (2024) · doi:10.20944/preprints202402.1751.v1 · Cited by 33
Is the fine-tuning evidence for a multiverse?
Goff, P. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04621-z · Cited by 11
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Goff, P.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Goff, Philip
- ORCID
- Goff, Philip
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2023-09-21
- OpenAlex
- W4387137342
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 62.59
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Theology and Philosophy of Evil
- Keywords
- teleology, atheism, cosmology, nature of consciousness, simulation hypothesis, laws of nature, religion and secularism, hope, political participation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review