Cited by 0Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisIndigenous Cultures and History

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 160 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Speaking Past: Positioning Oral Traditions in Archaeological Practice

Martindale, Andrew, Bruchac, Margaret, Supernant, Kisha, Nicholas, George·2025·The Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Oral Traditions and Archaeology

Abstract

This chapter examines how Indigenous oral traditions and archaeological practice intersect, revealing the power dynamics, colonial legacies, and cultural perspectives that shape historical narratives. It challenges the biases that marginalize oral histories in scholarly discourse and critiques the dominance of Western archaeological methodologies. By analyzing how oral traditions convey history and relate to material evidence, the chapter underscores the complexities of historical transmission, interpretation, and validation. It advocates for interdisciplinary collaboration and equitable partnerships that respect Indigenous knowledge systems while enhancing archaeological inquiry. Finally, the chapter urges scholars to adopt methodologies that integrate oral and material records, fostering a more inclusive and accurate understanding of the past.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197557686.013.26

Cites

160 of 160 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. 2017, Ifugao Archaeology: Collaborative and Indigenous Archaeology in the Northern Philippines., Advances in Archaeological Practice
  2. 1997, Mission Life Unearthed: An Aboriginal Perspective on Swan Reach., Oral History Association of Australia Journal
  3. 2014, From Paradigms to Practices: Pursuing Horizontal and Long-Term Relationships with Indigenous Peoples for Archaeological Heritage Management., Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie
  4. 2004, Exorcising Anthropology’s Demons
  5. 1939, The Beynon Manuscript.
  6. 2002, Witnessing Catastrophe: Correlations between Catastrophic Paleoenvironmental Events and First Nations’ Oral Traditions in North America’s Pacific Northwest.
  7. 2020, Collaboration Is Only a Tool to Decolonize the Museum., TRAJECTORIA
  8. 2007, Doing Archaeology as a Feminist., Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory
  9. 2018, Restoring the Chain of Memory: TGH Strehlow and the Repatriation of Australian Indigenous Knowledge
  10. 1996, The Trouble with Science
  11. Duncan, James R., and Carol Diaz-Granados. 2000. “Of Masks and Myths.” Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 25, no. 1: 1–26.
  12. Dykeman, D. D., and P. Roebuck. 2012. “Navajo Emergence in Dinétah: Social Imaginary and Archaeology.” In From the Land of Ever Winter to the American Southwest: Athapaskan Migrations, Mobility, and Ethnogenesis. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
  13. 2002, The Social Life of Pre-Sunrise Things: Indigenous Mesoamerican Archaeology., Current Anthropology
  14. 2019, Not Even Hearsay? The Oral Narratives of the First Nations of British Columbia., Journal of Northwest Anthropology
  15. 1998, Integrating History and Archaeology in the Study of Contact Period Philippine Chiefdoms., International Journal of Historical Archaeology
  16. 2017, On the Road of the Winds
  17. 2017, Cultural Performance: Ethnographic Approaches to Performance Studies
  18. 2012, Kōrero Tuku Iho’: Reconfiguring Oral History and Oral Tradition.
  19. 2000, Defending the Mouth of the Skeena: Perspectives on Tsimshian Tlingit Relations
  20. 2006, Methodological Issues in the Use of Tsimshian Oral Traditions (Adawx) in Archaeology., Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie
  21. 2014, Introduction: Community-Oriented Archaeology., Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie
  22. 2014, Archaeology as Federated Knowledge., Canadian Journal of Archaeology/Journal Canadien d’Archéologie
  23. 2020, Learning from the Ancestors: Collaboration and Community Engagement in the Care and Study of Ancestral Human Remains.
  24. 2019, I Was Surprised’: The UBC School and Hearsay—A Reply to David Henige., Journal of Northwest Anthropology
  25. Nicholas, George. 2003. “Understanding the Present, Honoring the Past.” In Indigenous People and Archaeology: Honouring the Past, Discussing the Present, Building for the Future. Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Chacmool Conference, edited by Trevor Peck, Evelyn Siegfried, and Gerald A. Oetelaar, 11–27. Calgary, Canada: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.
  26. Nicholas, George. 2010. “Seeking the End of Indigenous Archaeology.” In Bridging the Divide: Indigenous Communities and Archaeology into the 21st Century, edited by Caroline Phillips and Harry Allen, 233–252. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  27. Nicholas, George P., and Thomas D. Andrews. 1997. “Indigenous Archaeology in the Postmodern World.” In At a Crossroads: Archaeology and First Peoples in Canada, edited by George P. Nicholas and Thomas D. Andrews, 1–18. Burnaby, Canada: Archaeology Press.
  28. 2024, Working as Indigenous Archaeologists: Reckoning New Paths Between Past and Present Lives
  29. 1984, Anthropological Theory since the 1960s., Comparative Studies in Society and History
  30. 2007, Myth and Geology
  31. 2018, The Social Importance of Volcanic Peaks for the Indigenous Peoples of British Columbia., Journal of Northwest Anthropology
  32. 2016, Archaeological Research at Caution Bay
  33. 2008, The Western Illusion of Human Nature
  34. 2016, Oral Tradition and the Kennewick Man., Yale Law Journal
  35. Smith, Claire, Kellie Pollard, Alok Kanungo, Sally May, Sandra López Varela and Joe Watkins G. Nicholas. 2024. “Foreword.” In The Oxford Handbook of Global Indigenous Archaeologies. New York: Springer.
  36. 2015, Decolonizing Indigenous Histories: Pleistocene Archaeology Sites of the Western Hemisphere.
  37. 2013, On Applied Archaeology, Indigenous Knowledge, and the Usable Past., Current Anthropology
  38. 2020, Archaeologies of the Heart
  39. 2003, Understanding Early Civilizations: A Comparative Study
  40. Wobst, H. Martin. 2010. “Indigenous Archaeologies: A Worldwide Perspective on Human Materialities and Human Rights.” In Indigenous Archaeologies: A Reader in Decolonization, edited by Margaret M. Bruchac, Siobhan M. Hart, and H. Martin Wobst. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Martindale, A., Bruchac, M., Supernant, K., & Nicholas, G.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • DePaul University (US)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Indigenous Oral Traditions and Archaeology
Published
2025-07-22
OpenAlex
W4412567075
Cited by
0
References
163
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Oral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
indigenous oral tradition, oral history, colonial legacy, power relations, indigenous knowledge, historical transmission, physical evidence, interdisciplinary collaboration, equitable partnerships, historical narratives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review