CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 90Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesDecolonial Thought and EpistemologiesIndigenous Cultures and History

Epistemic Colonialism: Is it Possible to Decolonize Archaeology?

Schneider, Tsim D., Hayes, Katherine·2020·The American Indian Quarterly
DOI 10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0127
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In the fourteen years since the publication of Sonya Atalay's groundbreaking special issue of American Indian Quarterly, “Decolonizing Archaeology” (2006)—and the call for a more equitable and ethical, or decolonized, archaeology—we raise the question: Is it possible to decolonize archaeology? Of late, archaeologies of colonialism seek to counteract Western views of the plight of Indigenous populations and the systematic erasure of peoples, sites, and cultures from the land, from public memory, and the conventional writing of history. For archaeologists, countering narratives of Indigenous loss or absence requires gathering evidence—excavation in the soil and archives—to demonstrate resiliency, even as many present-day Indigenous communities doubt the very premise of that loss and the idea that their histories and cultures are missing or obscured. In this article, we acknowledge the colonial nature of evidence (epistemology) in archaeology. Introducing this special issue, we consider how archaeology has performed as a structure of settler colonialism, and how a close engagement with critical Indigenous theory can reorient us. We argue that a more equitable form of practice is evolving, but that decolonizing archaeology will require a kind of “undisciplining,” changing larger institutional structures in universities and heritage protection law. We thus consider the potentials or impossibilities for decolonizing archaeology by centering our questions in the scholarship on settler colonial studies and critical Indigenous theory.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1353/aiq.2020.a756930

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Schneider, T. D., & Hayes, K.
Venue
The American Indian Quarterly
Publisher
Project MUSE
Published
2020-03
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
127-148
ISSN
  • 0095-182X (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-1828
DOI
10.5250/amerindiquar.44.2.0127
OpenAlex
W3029059534
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
22.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Indian Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
Keywords
decolonizing archaeology, epistemic colonialism, settler colonialism, Indigenous epistemologies, Indigenous resilience, colonial archaeology, heritage protection law

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review