Cited by 70Cardiovascular Health and Risk FactorsHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionHealthcare Systems and Public Health

Effect of Risk Factor Values on Lifetime Risk of and Age at First Coronary Event

Fraser, Gary E., Lindsted, Kristian D., Lawrence Beeson, W.·1995·American Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

The effect of traditional coronary heart disease risk factors on lifetime risk, age at onset, and survival free of coronary disease has not been extensively studied. The authors have used the cohort data from 27,321 California Seventh-day Adventists who had no known heart disease in 1976 to investigate these questions. Multiple decrement life tables incorporating non-parametric estimates of conditional probabilities for both coronary disease and all other competing endpoints were used to estimate these survival outcomes. Variance estimators are provided in an appendix. Persons characterized by being either past smokers, diabetic, hypertensive, physically, non-vegetarian, or infrequent consumers of nuts often showed substantial differences in these survival outcomes. Statistically significant results include earlier age at onset of coronary disease at between 4 and 10 years, reduced life expectancy free of the disease between 5 and 9 years, and increased lifetime risk between 8% and 16%, when comparing groups with and without adverse values for different risk factors. The presence of adverse levels of two risk factors predicted even greater differences in these endpoints. These important effects are easily understood by the layman or non-epidemiologist professional, which is often not true of a relative risk. This should increase the effectiveness of such results when promoting behavioral change.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117706

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fraser, G. E., Lindsted, K. D., & Lawrence Beeson, W.
Affiliations
Loma Linda University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Epidemiology
Published
1995-10-01
Volume
142
Issue
7
Pages
746-758
ISSN
  • 0002-9262 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-6256
OpenAlex
W1894557797
Cited by
70
References
20
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG008961, 1 R01 AG08961-01A2)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Healthcare Systems and Public Health
Keywords
coronary artery disease, coronary risk factors, lifetime risk, age of onset, life expectancy, competing risks, multiple decrement life tables, Seventh-day Adventists, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, physical activity, vegetarian diet, nut consumption, behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, California, Coronary Disease, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Life Tables, Age of Onset, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review