Cited by 36Physical Activity and HealthObesity, Physical Activity, DietContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Four-week pedometer-determined activity patterns in normal weight and overweight UK adults

Open access
Clemes, S A, Griffiths, P L, Hamilton, S L·2007·International Journal of Obesity

Abstract

Objective To assess pedometer-determined physical activity levels and activity patterns in a sample of free-living normal weight and overweight UK adults.Design Pedometer-based 4-week observational study.Participants One hundred and twenty-two healthy participants, recruited from two regions in the UK, classified as normal weight (33 females and 26 males) or overweight (31 females and 32 males), in the age range of 18 to 65 years, completed the study.Measurements Daily step counts were measured using a Yamax SW-200 pedometer, and were then recorded in an activity log. Comparisons were made between activity patterns occurring over different days of the week for the normal weight and overweight groups. Measurements of height, weight and percentage body fat, by bioelectrical impedance, were taken pre- and post-study.Results A consistent reduction in activity was observed on a Sunday in the overweight group, and mean daily step counts accumulated on Sundays were significantly lower, by an average of 2221 steps/day, when compared with all other days of the week (all P<0.001). In comparison, no day-of-the-week effect was observed in the normal weight group. Mean step counts reported on each day of the week did not differ significantly between the two groups, with the exception of Sunday when the overweight group reported significantly fewer steps than the normal weight participants (8093 versus 10 538, P<0.001).Conclusions Activity levels dropped dramatically in the sample of overweight adults on a Sunday. Simple instructions to at-risk individuals, to increase their general activity levels on a Sunday, via general practitioners and public health messages could prove to be a subtle, but effective, strategy to tackle obesity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803420

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At baseline, physical activity was lowest on Sundays and highest on Saturdays, with Sunday activity significantly lower than average weekday activity (P = 0.010).

    “At baseline, physical activity was lowest on Sundays and highest on Saturdays (Figure 2b), with Sunday's activity significantly lower than the average weekday activity (P = 0.010 Sunday vs. weekdays)”

    From Influence of Weekend Lifestyle Patterns on Body Weight (2008) · cites this paper as [13]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Rhodes D, Murayi T, Cleveland L, Moshfegh A. The effect of dietary disinhibition on energy intake and eating patterns (Abstract). The Federation Of American Societies For Experimental Biology Journal 2005; 19: A1018.
  2. Haslam DW, James WP. Obesity. Lancet 2005; 366: 1197-1209.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clemes, S. A., Griffiths, P. L., & Hamilton, S. L.
Affiliations
Loughborough University (GB)
Corresponding author
Clemes, S A
Venue
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2006-06-20
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
261-266
ISSN
  • 0307-0565 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5497
OpenAlex
W2055666861
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • International Journal of Obesity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity patterns, step count, overweight adults, normal-weight individuals, day-of-week variation, obesity prevention, pedometer-measured activity, free-living physical activity
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Body Composition, Body Weight, Physical Exertion, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Periodicity, Sex Factors, Body Mass Index, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review