Cited by 47Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPregnancy and Medication Impact

Pregnancy: Alcohol and risk of spontaneous abortion

Parazzini, Fabio, Tozzi, Luca, Chatenoud, Liliane, Restelli, Simona, Luchini, Laura, Vecchia, Carlo La·1994·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the association between alcohol drinking before and during pregnancy and the risk of spontaneous abortion using data from a case-control study conducted in Milan, Italy. A total of 462 women (median age 30 years) were admitted for spontaneous abortion (within the 12th week of gestation) to a network of obstetrics departments in the greater Milan area. Of these, 148 (32%) were between the fourth and the eighth week of gestation and 314 (68%) between the ninth and the 12th week. A control group was made up of 814 women (median age 29 years) who gave birth at term (> 37 weeks gestation) to healthy infants (Apgar 5th minute > or = 8, weight > or = 3000 g) on randomly selected days at the same hospitals where cases had been identified. A total of 212 cases (46%) and 355 controls (47%) reported alcohol drinking before conception. Considering non-drinkers as the reference category, the relative risks (RR) of spontaneous abortion were 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.9-1.6] and 0.8 (95% CI, 0.6-1.1), respectively, in drinkers of one to seven and more than seven drinks per week before conception. No association emerged between the duration of alcohol drinking and the risk of spontaneous abortion. A total of 166 cases (35.9%) and 263 (32.3%) controls reported any alcohol drinking during the first trimester of pregnancy. The corresponding relative risk was 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.4) and no relationship emerged between the number of drinks per week and the risk of abortion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138365

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A defect in decidualization can result from changes in immune cells, foremost uterine natural killer cells, or endometrial stem cells, which may result in endometrial breakdown and miscarriage.

    “A defect in decidualization can result from changes in immune cells, 52 foremost uterine natural killer cells, 53 or endometrial stem cells, 54,55 which may result in endometrial breakdown and miscarriage.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parazzini, F., Tozzi, L., Chatenoud, L., Restelli, S., Luchini, L., & Vecchia, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research (IT)
Corresponding author
Parazzini, Fabio
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
1994-10
Volume
9
Issue
10
Pages
1950-1953
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2298401286
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
alcohol consumption, miscarriage, pregnancy, miscarriage risk, maternal drinking
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Beer, Female, Humans, Italy, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Risk Factors, Smoking, Wine, Multivariate Analysis, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review