Cited by 59Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsAlcohol Consumption and Health EffectsPregnancy and Medication Impact

Volume and type of alcohol during early pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage

Open access
Avalos, Lyndsay Ammon, Roberts, Sarah CM, Kaskutas, Lee Ann, Block, Gladys, Li, De-Kun·2014·Substance Use & Misuse

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research on alcohol consumption during pregnancy and miscarriage spans over three decades, yet the relationship is still not well-understood. OBJECTIVES: To assess the relationship between volume and type of alcohol consumed during pregnancy in relation to miscarriage. METHODS: We utilized data from a population-based cohort study of pregnant women (n = 1061) of which 172 (16%) women had a miscarriage. Upon study entry, participants were asked about their alcohol consumption during pregnancy. Based on the average number of drinks per week, women were categorized into one of three categories: four or more drinks per week (n = 32, 3%), less than four drinks per week (n = 403, 38%), and no alcohol intake (n = 626, 59%). In addition, women were categorized by the type of alcohol beverage they consumed: beer only (n = 47, 4%), spirits only (n = 56, 5%), wine only (n = 160, 15%), or a combination of two or more types of alcohol (n = 172, 16%). RESULTS: A significant increased risk of miscarriage (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 2.65; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38, 5.10) was found for women who drank four or more drinks a week. Our findings also suggest the relationship between alcohol intake during pregnancy and miscarriage is strongest for miscarriage occurring prior to 10 weeks of gestation. In addition, women who drank only spirits had more than a two-fold increased risk of miscarriage compared to women who abstained (aHR: 2.24; 95% CI: 1.32, 3.81). Conclusions/Importance: Future research assessing the factors that may contribute to an increased risk of miscarriage should consider the type of alcohol consumed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10826084.2014.912228

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Developmental abnormalities of embryos not seen in live births are found in miscarriages with normal chromosomes.

    “In addition, developmental abnormalities of embryos not seen in live births are found in miscarriages with normal chromosomes. 49,50”

    From Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss (2021) · cites this paper as [50]

    The Measures > Miscarriage section defines and describes how miscarriage was ascertained, and the Discussion > Limitations section says diagnoses were clinical. Neither addresses embryonic developmental abnormalities, chromosome status, or a comparison with live births. Searches for the claim’s wording and for chromosomally normal miscarriages found no relevant passage in our copy; page numbers were not provided. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avalos, L. A., Roberts, S. C., Kaskutas, L. A., Block, G., & Li, D.-K.
Affiliations
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Alcohol Research Group (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Avalos, Lyndsay Ammon
Venue
Substance Use & Misuse
Published
2014-05-08
Volume
49
Issue
11
Pages
1437-1445
ISSN
  • 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2491
OpenAlex
W2146851671
Cited by
59
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Substance Use & Misuse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (T32-AA007240-29, T32AA007240)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
prenatal alcohol exposure, miscarriage, alcoholic beverages, wine, beer, early pregnancy, pregnancy loss risk
MeSH terms
Abortion, Spontaneous, Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Ethanol, Beer, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Risk, Wine, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review