Cited by 9Astrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

MAXI/SSC all-sky maps from 0.7 keV to 4 keV

Open access
Nakahira, Satoshi, Tsunemi, Hiroshi, Tomida, Hiroshi, Nakashima, Shinya, Kataoka, Ryuho, Makishima, Kazuo·2020·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan

Abstract

By accumulating data from the Solid-state Slit Camera (SSC) on board the MAXI mission from 2009 to 2011, diffuse X-ray background maps were obtained in energies of 0.7–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–4.0 keV. They are the first to be derived with a solid-state instrument, and to be compared with the previous ROSAT all-sky survey result. While the SSC map in the highest energy band is dominated by point sources and the Galactic diffuse X-ray emission, that in 0.7–1.0 keV reveals an extended X-ray structure, of which the brightness distribution is very similar to that observed with ROSAT about 20 years before. As in the ROSAT result, the emission is dominated by a bright arc-like structure, which appears to be part of a circle of ∼50° radius centered at about (l,b) ∼ (340°, 15°). In addition, the SSC map suggests a fainter and larger ellipse, which is elongated in the north–south direction and roughly centered at the Galactic center. The spectrum of these structures is explained as thin thermal emission from a plasma, with a temperature of ∼0.31 keV and an abundance of ∼0.3 solar. Based on SSC observation conditions including low solar activity, the solar wind charge exchange signals are estimated to be negligible in the present SSC maps, as well as in the >0.56 keV ROSAT map. A brief discussion is given on the results obtained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/pasj/psz139

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High-sensitivity X-ray telescopes eROSITA and MAXI have detected the southern counterpart of the NPS, known as the eROSITA bubbles.

    “It was only very recently that the high-sensitivity X-ray telescopes, such as eROSITA (Predehl et al. 2021) and MAXI , have been able to detect the southern counterpart of the NPS, known as the eROSITA bubbles (Predehl et al. 2020; Nakahira et al. 2020).”

    From The Fermi/eROSITA bubbles: a look into the nuclear outflow from the Milky Way (2024) · cites this paper as Nakahira et al. 2020

    Section 5.2 reports that MAXI/SSC detected a faint southern X-ray feature and describes the extended structure as approximately north–south symmetric, supporting the southern-feature portion of the claim. It does not identify that feature as the eROSITA bubbles; it also notes that the feature is visible in the earlier ROSAT map. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Shidatsu, M., Ueda, Y., Kawamuro, T., Hori, T., Nakahira, S., & MAXI Team 2017, in Proc. Seven years of MAXI: Monitoring X-ray Transients (Waco: Riken), 29
  2. Tsunemi, H., Tomida, H., Nakahira, S., & SSC Team 2017, in Proc. Seven years of MAXI: Monitoring X-ray Transients (Waco: Riken), 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakahira, S., Tsunemi, H., Tomida, H., Nakashima, S., Kataoka, R., & Makishima, K.
Affiliations
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • The University of Osaka (JP)
  • RIKEN (JP)
  • The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, SOKENDAI (JP)
  • Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (JP)
Corresponding author
Nakahira, Satoshi
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan
Published
2020-01-31
Volume
72
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0004-6264 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-051X
OpenAlex
W2992836606
Cited by
9
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • RIKEN
  • JAXA
  • MAXI
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
diffuse X-ray background, all-sky maps, MAXI, ROSAT All-Sky Survey, Galactic Center, solar wind charge exchange, soft X-ray emission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review