Cited by 97Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and TreatmentPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Integrating Motivational Interviewing in Pain Neuroscience Education for People With Chronic Pain: A Practical Guide for Clinicians

Open access
Nijs, Jo, Wijma, Amarins J, Willaert, Ward, Huysmans, Eva, Mintken, Paul, Smeets, Rob, Goossens, Mariëlle, van Wilgen, C Paul +4 more·2020·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Pain neuroscience education (PNE) and motivational interviewing (MI) have been widely implemented and tested in the field of chronic pain management, and both strategies have been shown to be effective in the short term (small effect sizes) for the management of chronic pain. PNE uses contemporary pain science to educate patients about the biopsychosocial nature of the chronicity of their pain experience. The goal of PNE is to optimize patients’ pain beliefs/perceptions to facilitate the acquisition of adaptive pain–coping strategies. MI, on the other hand, is a patient-centered communication style for eliciting and enhancing motivation for behavior change by shifting the patient away from a state of indecision or uncertainty. Conceptually, PNE and MI appear to be complementary interventions, with complementary rather than overlapping effects; MI primarily improves cognitive and behavioral awareness and, potentially, adherence to treatment principles, whereas PNE potentially increases pain knowledge/beliefs, awareness, and willingness to explore psychological factors that are potentially associated with pain. Therefore, combining PNE with MI might lead to improved outcomes with larger and longer-lasting effect sizes. The combined use of PNE and MI in patients having chronic pain is introduced here, along with a description of how clinicians might be able to integrate PNE and MI in the treatment of patients experiencing chronic pain. Clinical trials are needed to examine whether combining PNE with MI is superior to PNE or MI alone for improving pain and quality of life in patients having chronic pain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/pzaa021

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Through PNE a person may gain insight that helps them shift from a perspective of pain as equal to tissue damage to a broader understanding of pain as a protective and adaptive response that may be activated by a wide array of body, mind, and environmental stimuli.

    “Through PNE the person may gain insight that helps them shift from a perspective of pain as equal to tissue damage to a more broad understanding of pain as a protective and adaptive response which may be activated from a wide array of body, mind, and environmental stimuli.28,50-53”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pain neuroscience education is an integral part of physical therapy pain care.

    “Pain neuroscience education (PNE) is an integral part of physical therapy pain care.”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The introduction (p. 2) says PNE is widely implemented in chronic pain management, and “Motivational Interviewing Plus Explaining Pain” (p. 6) includes physical therapists among clinicians who can use it. The paper does not establish PNE as an integral part of physical therapy pain care generally; it describes PNE as a treatment concept to tailor to patients rather than a standard intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Integration of PNE with active interventions and cognitive based approaches demonstrates a synergistic and larger effect for clinically important improvements in pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and function.

    “Integration of PNE with active interventions and cognitive based approaches demonstrates a synergistic and larger effect for clinically important improvements in pain and disability, kinesiophobia, and function.20,51,52,55”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Evidence Supporting the Use of PNE section (p. 4) says combining PNE with cognition-targeted exercise has a synergistic effect, with medium-to-large effects sustained for one year in patients with chronic spinal pain. It does not establish clinically important improvements in each listed outcome—pain, disability, kinesiophobia, and function—from the combination. The Motivational Interviewing Plus Explaining Pain section (p. 4) instead identifies clinically meaningful kinesiophobia improvement with PNE and says pain and disability improvements following PNE alone were not clinically important. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using MI with PNE has shown positive effects for the management of chronic pain and adherence to treatment and is well-aligned with a PiPT acceptance and mindfulness approach to pain care.

    “Using MI with PNE has shown positive effects for the management of chronic pain and adherence to treatment and is well-aligned with a PiPT acceptance and mindfulness approach to pain care. 52”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Conclusion (p. 7) says MI and PNE have each shown some short-term benefit in chronic pain management, with MI primarily improving treatment adherence. It says combining them may improve outcomes but that clinical trials are needed; it also links the combined approach to acceptance-based interventions, without addressing mindfulness or PiPT specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The success of delivery of PiPT and PNE has been shown to be impacted by the PT's confidence and comfort with the program as well as the therapist having the qualities necessary to implement patient-centered care.

    “The success of delivery of PiPT and PNE has been shown to be impacted by the PT’s confidence and comfort with the program as well as the therapist having the qualities necessary to implement patient-centered care.20,28,32,35,44,52”

    From Remotely Delivered Psychologically Informed Mindful Movement Physical Therapy for Pain Care: A Framework for Operationalization (2023) · cites this paper as [52]

    The section “Evidence Supporting the Use of PNE in People With Chronic Pain” (p. 5) says therapists’ interpersonal and communication skills influence the therapeutic relationship and describes qualities needed for patient-centered care. “Motivational Interviewing Plus Explaining Pain” (p. 6) also lists skills needed to deliver PNE with motivational interviewing. Neither passage establishes that PTs’ confidence or comfort with a program affects delivery success, and the paper does not address PiPT in the passages found. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 4 Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet . 2015;386:743-800.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijs, J., Wijma, A. J., Willaert, W., Huysmans, E., Mintken, P., Smeets, R., Goossens, M., van Wilgen, C. P., Van Bogaert, W., Louw, A., Cleland, J., & Donaldson, M.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Vrije Universiteit Brussel; and Transcare Pain, Transdisciplinary Treatment Center Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Pain in Motion International Research Group,
  • Pain in Motion International Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy,
  • International Spine and Pain Institute (US)
  • Franklin Pierce University (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
Corresponding author
Nijs, Jo
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2020-01-29
Volume
100
Issue
5
Pages
846-859
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W3003369303
Cited by
97
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European College for Lymphatic Therapy, Harderwijk
  • Research Foundation Flanders (G007217)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
pain neuroscience education, motivational interviewing, chronic pain, patient education, pain beliefs, pain coping, biopsychosocial model of pain, patient-centered communication, behavior change, medication adherence, quality of life
MeSH terms
Cognition, Humans, Neurosciences, Quality of Life, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Pain Perception, Chronic Pain, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review