Cited by 59Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPain Management and Treatment

Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative neuroscience education for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy

Open access
Louw, Adriaan, Diener, Ina, Landers, Merrill R., Zimney, Kory, Puentedura, Emilio J.·2016·Journal of Spine Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from a previous multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) on preoperative pain neuroscience education (PNE) for lumbar radiculopathy found no significant difference in patient reported outcomes between groups. However, patients who received PNE viewed their surgical experience more favorably and utilized significantly less healthcare compared to those that did not. The purpose is to determine if the reduction in healthcare costs from 1-year would be continued at 3-year following surgery, and to explore differences (if any) in patient reported outcomes. Study design-analysis of 3-year follow-up data from RCT on preoperative PNE for lumbar radiculopathy. METHODS: Participating patients from the previous RCT were contacted for 3-year follow-up. Of the 67 patients who commenced in the study, there were 61 who completed 1-year follow-up. Data packets were sent to these 61 patients to examine post-operative utilization of healthcare (Utilization of Healthcare Questionnaire); LBP [numeric rating scale (NRS)]; leg pain (NRS); function (Oswestry disability index); and beliefs and experiences related to LS (10 item survey with Likert responses). RESULTS: At 3-year follow-up, 50 patients (29 females) responded, with 22 patients in the experimental group (EG) and 28 in the control group (CG). Cumulative medical expenses were 37% lower for the EG, with those patients spending less on X-rays and visits to their family physician, physical therapist, and massage therapist. There were no differences in patient reported outcomes between groups. Patients who received PNE continued to view their surgical experience more favorably compared to those that did not. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a single PNE session prior to surgery for lumbar radiculopathy results in significant healthcare savings over 3 years. Educating such patients about normal responses to lumbar surgery (LS) in a neuroscience framework may result in lasting behavior changes following surgery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21037/jss.2016.12.04

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. © OSS Press Ltd. All rights reserved. J Spine Surg 2016;2(4):289-298 jss.osspress.com
  2. Moseley GL. Reconceptualising pain acording to modern pain sciences. Phys Ther Rev 2007;12:169-78.
  3. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Behavior Change: The transtheoretical model of health behaviour change. American Journal of Health Promotion 1998;12:38-48.
  4. © OSS Press Ltd. All rights reserved. J Spine Surg 2016;2(4):289-298
  5. jss.osspress.com Cite this article as: Louw A, Diener I, Landers MR, Zimney K, Puentedura EJ. Three-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial comparing preoperative neuroscience education for patients undergoing surgery for lumbar radiculopathy. J Spine Surg 2016;2(4):289-298. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.12.04

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Louw, A., Diener, I., Landers, M. R., Zimney, K., & Puentedura, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Stellenbosch University (ZA)
  • University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
Corresponding author
Puentedura, Emilio J.
Venue
Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2016-12
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
289-298
ISSN
  • 2414-4630 (ISSN-L)
  • 2414-469X
OpenAlex
W2568564197
Cited by
59
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Spine Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain neuroscience education, lumbar radiculopathy, lumbar spine surgery, health care costs, health care utilization, patient-reported outcomes, low back pain, leg pain, disability, long-term follow-up, patient education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review