The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States*
Open accessAbstract
We construct publicly available statistics on parents’ incomes and students’ earnings outcomes for each college in the United States using deidentified data from tax records. These statistics reveal that the degree of parental income segregation across colleges is very high, similar to that across neighborhoods. Differences in postcollege earnings between children from low- and high-income families are much smaller among students who attend the same college than across colleges. Colleges with the best earnings outcomes predominantly enroll students from high-income families, although a few mid-tier public colleges have both low parent income levels and high student earnings. Linking these income data to SAT and ACT scores, we simulate how changes in the allocation of students to colleges affect segregation and intergenerational mobility. Equalizing application, admission, and matriculation rates across parental income groups conditional on test scores would reduce segregation substantially, primarily by increasing the representation of middle-class students at more selective colleges. However, it would have little effect on the fraction of low-income students at elite private colleges because there are relatively few students from low-income families with sufficiently high SAT/ACT scores. Differences in parental income distributions across colleges could be eliminated by giving low- and middle-income students a sliding-scale preference in the application and admissions process similar to that implicitly given to legacy students at elite private colleges. Assuming that 80% of observational differences in students’ earnings conditional on test scores, race, and parental income are due to colleges’ causal effects—a strong assumption, but one consistent with prior work—such changes could reduce intergenerational income persistence among college students by about 25%. We conclude that changing how students are allocated to colleges could substantially reduce segregation and increase intergenerational mobility, even without changing colleges’ educational programs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Where is the land of Opportunity? The Geography of Intergenerational Mobility in the United States *
Chetty, R., Hendren, N., Kline, P., & Saez, E. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju022 · Cited by 2,922
Self-citationIntergenerational Income Mobility in the United States
Solon, G. (2016) · American Economic Review · Cited by 1,592
Our kids: the American dream in crisis
(2015) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.191635 · Cited by 1,223
The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I: Childhood Exposure Effects*
Chetty, R., & Hendren, N. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy007 · Cited by 1,135
Self-citationDale, S. B., & Krueger, A. B. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302320935089 · Cited by 995
Life-Cycle Variation in the Association between Current and Lifetime Earnings
Haider, S., & Solon, G. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.4.1308 · Cited by 744
Inequality in America: what role for human capital policies?
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-6647 · Cited by 731
Crossing the Finish Line: Completing College at America’s Public Universities
Bowen, W. G. (2018) · Ever the Leader · doi:10.1515/9781400888924-011 · Cited by 729
How robust is the evidence on the effects of college quality? Evidence from matching
Black, D. A., & Smith, J. A. (2004) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.006 · Cited by 673
More Universalism, Less Structural Mobility: The American Occupational Structure in the 1980s
Hout, M. (1988) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/228904 · Cited by 643
Cited by
Chetty, R., Friedman, J., Stepner, M., & Team, T. O. I. (2020) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w27431 · Cited by 697
Self-citation“Capitalists in the Twenty-First Century”
Smith, M., Yagan, D., Zidar, O., & Zwick, E. (2019) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjz020 · Cited by 263
Self-citationAffirmative Action, Mismatch, and Economic Mobility after California’s Proposition 209
Bleemer, Z. (2021) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjab027 · Cited by 149
College Costs, Financial Aid, and Student Decisions
Dynarski, S., Page, L., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w30275 · Cited by 56
The Returns to College(s): Relative Value-Added and Match Effects in Higher Education
Mountjoy, J., & Hickman, B. (2020) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3537773 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Saez, E., Turner, N., & Yagan, D.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-02-02
- Volume
- 135
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1567-1633
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W3007051557
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 68.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/qje/qjaa005
- The paper
- Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N., Saez, E., Turner, N., & Yagan, D. (2020). Income Segregation and Intergenerational Mobility Across Colleges in the United States*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjaa005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.