CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 259Climate Change Policy and EconomicsGlobal trade and economicsEnergy, Environment, Economic Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Environmental Bias of Trade Policy*

Open access
Shapiro, Joseph S·2021·The Quarterly Journal of Economics
DOI 10.1093/qje/qjaa042
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This article describes a new fact, then analyzes its causes and consequences: in most countries, import tariffs and nontariff barriers are substantially lower on dirty than on clean industries, where an industry’s “dirtiness” is defined as its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per dollar of output. This difference in trade policy creates a global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions in internationally traded goods and contributes to climate change. This global implicit subsidy to CO2 emissions totals several hundred billion dollars annually. The greater protection of downstream industries, which are relatively clean, substantially accounts for this pattern. The downstream pattern can be explained by theories where industries lobby for low tariffs on their inputs but final consumers are poorly organized. A quantitative general equilibrium model suggests that if countries applied similar trade policies to clean and dirty goods, global CO2 emissions would decrease and global real income would change little.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/qje/qjaa042

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Grossman, 1994, Protection for Sale, American Economic Review, 84, 833
  2. Horowitz, 2006, Concepts and Methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts
  3. Maggi, 2016, Issue Linkage, 513
  4. Marvel, 1983, The Kennedy Round: Evidence on the Regulation of International Trade in the United States, American Economic Review, 73, 190
  5. Rodrik, 1995, Political Economy of Trade Policy, 1457
  6. Shapiro, 2016, Trade Costs, CO2, and the Environment, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 8, 220
  7. Stern, 2006, The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review
  8. Tukker, Arnold, Arjan de Koning, Richard Wood, Troy Hawkins, Stephan Lutter, Jose Acosta, Jose M. Rueda Cantuche, Maaike Bouwmeester, Jan Oosterhaven, Thomas Drosdowski, and Jeroen Kuenen, 2013, Economic Systems Research

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–259 of 259

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shapiro, J. S.
Affiliations
National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
Corresponding author
Shapiro, Joseph S
ORCID
Shapiro, Joseph S
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2020-12-16
Volume
136
Issue
2
Pages
831-886
ISSN
  • 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4650
DOI
10.1093/qje/qjaa042
OpenAlex
W3114459510
Cited by
259
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 70 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 4
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Economics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1850790)
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Keywords
trade policy, environmental bias, import tariffs, non-tariff barriers, CO2 emissions, heavily polluting industries, climate change, industry lobbying, general equilibrium model, international trade

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review