Investigation of the benefits of early malnutrition screening with telehealth follow up in elderly acute medical admissions
Abstract
Background The benefit of providing early nutrition intervention and its continuation post-discharge in older hospitalized patients is unclear. This study examined efficacy of such an intervention in older patients discharged from acute care. Methods In this randomized controlled trial, 148 malnourished patients were randomized to receive either a nutrition intervention for 3 months or usual care. Intervention included an individualized nutrition care plan plus monthly post-discharge telehealth follow-up whereas control patients received intervention only upon referral by their treating clinicians. Nutrition status was determined by the Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) tool. Clinical outcomes included changes in length of hospital stay, complications during hospitalization, Quality of life (QoL), mortality and re-admission rate. Results Fifty-four males and 94 females (mean age, 81.8 years) were included. Both groups significantly improved PG-SGA scores from baseline. There was no between-group differences in the change in PG-SGA scores and final PG-SGA scores were similar at 3 months 6.9 (95% CI 5.6-8.3) vs. 5.8 (95% CI 4.8-6.9) (P = 0.09), in control and intervention groups, respectively. Median total length of hospital stay was 6 days shorter in the intervention group (11.4 (IQR 16.6) vs. 5.4 (IQR 8.1) (P = 0.01). There was no significant difference in complication rate during hospitalization, QoL and mortality at 3-months or readmission rate at 1, 3…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Readmission rates were not reduced after three months in one of the largest trials, in geriatric patients, or in older patients.
“While readmission rates as an indicator of clinical course e.g. were not reduced after three months in one of the largest trials to date (level of evidence: 1þþ) [9] in geriatric patients (level of evidence: 1þ) [131] or in older patients (level of evidence: 1-) [132]”
From ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients (2023) · cites this paper as [132]
Cites
Protein and energy supplementation in elderly people at risk from malnutrition
Milne, A. C., Potter, J., Vivanti, A., & Avenell, A. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003288.pub3 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Nutritional strategies to boost immunity and prevent infection in elderly individuals
High, K. P. (2001) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/324509 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ESPEN guideline on nutritional support for polymorbid medical inpatients
Wunderle, C., Gomes, F., Schuetz, P., Stumpf, F., Austin, P., Ballesteros-Pomar, M. D., Cederholm, T., Fletcher, J., Laviano, A., Norman, K., et al. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2023.06.023 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“…trials to date (level of evidence: 1 þþ ) [9] in geriatric patients ( level of evidence: 1 þ ) [131 ] or in older patients ( level of evidence: 1) [132], it was signi fi cantly reduced after six months of nutritional intervention in several trials ( level of evidence: 1) [116] ( level of evidence:…”
Marx, W., Kelly, J. T., Crichton, M., Craven, D., Collins, J., Mackay, H., Isenring, E., & Marshall, S. (2018) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.02.012 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Moloney, L., & Jarrett, B. (2021) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2020.09.026 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Gressies, C., Kaegi-Braun, N., Gomes, F., & Schuetz, P. (2023) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2022.11.007 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sharma, Y., Thompson, C. H., Kaambwa, B., Shahi, R., Hakendorf, P., & Miller, M.
- Affiliations
- Flinders University (AU)
- The University of Adelaide (AU)
- Monash University (AU)
- Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
- Venue
- QJM: An International Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2017-05-04
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 639-647
- ISSN
- 0033-5622 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2725
- 1460-2393
- OpenAlex
- W2610695436
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- QJM (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
- Keywords
- malnutrition screening, older adults, acute medical admissions, telehealth follow-up, Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment, length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, mortality, quality of life, hospitalized patients
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Mass Screening, Nutritional Status, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index, South Australia, Logistic Models, Telemedicine, Malnutrition, Nutrition Therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review