The Intergenerational Transmission of Risk and Trust Attitudes
Abstract
Recent theories endogenize the attitude endowments of individuals, assuming that they are shaped by the attitudes of parents and other role models. This paper tests empirically for the relevance of three aspects of the attitude transmission process highlighted in this theoretical literature: (1) transmission of attitudes from parents to children; (2) an impact of prevailing attitudes in the local environment on child attitudes; and (3) positive assortative mating of parents, which enhances the ability of a parent to pass on his or her attitudes to the child. We focus on two fundamentally important attitudes, willingness to take risks and willingness to trust others. We find empirical support for all three aspects, providing an empirical underpinning for the literature. An investigation of underlying mechanisms shows that socialization is important in the transmission process. Various parental characteristics and aspects of family structure are found to strengthen the socialization process, with implications for modeling the socialization production function and for policies focused on affecting children's non-cognitive skills. The paper also provides evidence that the transmission of risk and trust attitudes affects a wide variety of child outcomes, implying a potentially large total effect on children's economic situation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A preference channel for intergenerational persistence in educational attainment is supported by the observation that preferences and aspirations are transmitted from parents to children.
“A preference channel for intergenerational persistence in educational attainment is also supported by the observation that preferences and aspirations are transmitted from parents to children (see for example Dohmen et al. 2012).”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Dohmen et al. 2012
Cites
The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior
Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006) · Journal of Labor Economics · doi:10.1086/504455 · Cited by 4,427 · see citing works
Cooperation and Punishment in Public Goods Experiments
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.4.980 · Cited by 4,416 · see citing works
Oxytocin increases trust in humans
Kosfeld, M., Heinrichs, M., Zak, P. J., Fischbacher, U., & Fehr, E. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03701 · Cited by 3,690 · see citing works
Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555280 · Cited by 2,400 · see citing works
THE ROLE OF NONCOGNITIVE SKILLS IN EXPLAINING COGNITIVE TEST SCORES
BORGHANS, L., MEIJERS, H., & TER WEEL, B. (2008) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2007.00073.x · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On The Economics and Biology of Trust
Fehr, E. (2009) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1162/jeea.2009.7.2-3.235 · Cited by 680 · see citing works
Does Oxytocin Increase Trust in Humans? A Critical Review of Research
Nave, G., Camerer, C., & McCullough, M. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615600138 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Epidemics and trust: the case of the Spanish flu
Aassve, A., Alfani, G., Gandolfi, F., & Le Moglie, M. (2021) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.4218 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Cavanagh, C., & Cauffman, E. (2015) · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law · doi:10.1037/law0000054 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U.
- Affiliations
- German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Swarthmore College (US)
- Venue
- The Review of Economic Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-11-10
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 645-677
- ISSN
- 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-937X
- OpenAlex
- W2126952774
- Cited by
- 1,037
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 46 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 37
- FWCI
- 205.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- intergenerational transmission, risk preferences, parental influence, assortative mating, socialization, non-cognitive skills, family structure, child outcomes, local environment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review