Cited by 1,037Intergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesCulture, Economy, and Development StudiesExperimental Behavioral Economics Studies

The Intergenerational Transmission of Risk and Trust Attitudes

Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U.·2012·The Review of Economic Studies

Abstract

Recent theories endogenize the attitude endowments of individuals, assuming that they are shaped by the attitudes of parents and other role models. This paper tests empirically for the relevance of three aspects of the attitude transmission process highlighted in this theoretical literature: (1) transmission of attitudes from parents to children; (2) an impact of prevailing attitudes in the local environment on child attitudes; and (3) positive assortative mating of parents, which enhances the ability of a parent to pass on his or her attitudes to the child. We focus on two fundamentally important attitudes, willingness to take risks and willingness to trust others. We find empirical support for all three aspects, providing an empirical underpinning for the literature. An investigation of underlying mechanisms shows that socialization is important in the transmission process. Various parental characteristics and aspects of family structure are found to strengthen the socialization process, with implications for modeling the socialization production function and for policies focused on affecting children's non-cognitive skills. The paper also provides evidence that the transmission of risk and trust attitudes affects a wide variety of child outcomes, implying a potentially large total effect on children's economic situation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/restud/rdr027

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A preference channel for intergenerational persistence in educational attainment is supported by the observation that preferences and aspirations are transmitted from parents to children.

    “A preference channel for intergenerational persistence in educational attainment is also supported by the observation that preferences and aspirations are transmitted from parents to children (see for example Dohmen et al. 2012).”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Dohmen et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U.
Affiliations
  • German Institute for Economic Research (DE)
  • Swarthmore College (US)
Venue
The Review of Economic Studies
Published
2011-11-10
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
645-677
ISSN
  • 0034-6527 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-937X
OpenAlex
W2126952774
Cited by
1,037
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 66 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 77 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 37
FWCI
205.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economic Studies (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
Keywords
intergenerational transmission, risk preferences, parental influence, assortative mating, socialization, non-cognitive skills, family structure, child outcomes, local environment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review