CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,136Climate Change Policy and EconomicsSustainable Finance and Green BondsStochastic processes and financial applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Carbon Tail Risk

Open access
Ilhan, Emirhan, Sautner, Zacharias, Vilkov, Grigory·2021·The Review of Financial Studies
DOI 10.1093/rfs/hhaa071
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Strong regulatory actions are needed to combat climate change, but climate policy uncertainty makes it difficult for investors to quantify the impact of future climate regulation. We show that such uncertainty is priced in the option market. The cost of option protection against downside tail risks is larger for firms with more carbon-intense business models. For carbon-intense firms, the cost of protection against downside tail risk is magnified at times when the public’s attention to climate change spikes, and it decreased after the election of climate change skeptic President Trump.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rfs/hhaa071

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 59 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Cont,, 2004, Financial modelling with jumps
  2. Delis,, 2020, Being stranded on fossil reserves? Climate policy risk and the pricing of bank loans
  3. 2019, Carbon pricing: Heavy weather
  4. Görgen,, 2020, Carbon risk
  5. 2018, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Special report: Global warming of 1.5° C
  6. Litterman,, 2016, Climate risk: Tail risk and the price of carbon emissions—Answers to the risk management puzzle
  7. Ramelli,, 2020, Stock price rewards to climate saints and sinners: Evidence from the Trump Election
  8. Trump,, 2012, The concept of global warming was created by and for the Chinese in order to make U.S

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–700 of 1,001

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • Frankfurt School of Finance & Management (DE)
Corresponding author
Sautner, Zacharias
ORCID
Venue
The Review of Financial Studies
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2020-06-27
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
1540-1571
ISSN
  • 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-7368
DOI
10.1093/rfs/hhaa071
OpenAlex
W3121471843
Cited by
1,136
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 292 · 2025: 279 · 2024: 202 · 2023: 152 · 2022: 105 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 28
FWCI
39.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
Locations
  • Review of Financial Studies (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Stochastic processes and financial applications
Keywords
climate policy uncertainty, carbon-intensive firms, options market, downside risk protection, climate change skepticism, Trump administration, carbon pricing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review