Cited by 30Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Characteristics of suitable work from the perspective of patients with fibromyalgia

Bossema, E. R., Kool, M. B., Cornet, D., Vermaas, P., de Jong, M., van Middendorp, H., Geenen, R.·2012·Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The evaluation of work ability of patients with FM is difficult. Our aim was to investigate the characteristics of suitable work from the perspective of patients with FM. METHODS: Interviews with patients yielded statements about characteristics of suitable work. Patients individually sorted these statements according to similarity. Hierarchical cluster analysis was applied to these sortings. RESULTS: The hierarchical structure included 74 characteristics of suitable work. The 10 clusters at the lowest level included (i) recovery opportunities, (ii) pace of work, (iii) not too high workload, (iv) keeping energy for home and free time, (v) match between work and capabilities, (vi) development opportunities, (vii) understanding from colleagues, (viii) help from colleagues, (ix) support from management and (x) work agreements with management. CONCLUSIONS: According to patients with FM, suitable work is paced in such a way that one can perform the job well and with satisfaction while keeping energy for home and free time and having acknowledgement and help from management and colleagues. The brief suitable work checklist that is provided can help patients with FM to negotiate with employers and job professionals to improve the match between job demands and capabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rheumatology/ker312

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bossema, E. R., Kool, M. B., Cornet, D., Vermaas, P., de Jong, M., van Middendorp, H., & Geenen, R.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Rheumatology
Published
2011-10-22
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
311-318
ISSN
  • 1462-0324 (ISSN-L)
  • 1462-0332
OpenAlex
W2123725359
Cited by
30
References
50
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Lara D. Veeken (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
fibromyalgia, work ability, patient perspectives, work pace, workload, workplace support
MeSH terms
Adult, Employment, Female, Fibromyalgia, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Job Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Social Support, Work Capacity Evaluation, Cluster Analysis, Workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review