Cited by 187Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement AnalysisFinancial Literacy and BehaviorFinancial Markets and Investment Strategies

Stock Market Literacy, Trust, and Participation

Open access
Balloch, Adnan, Nicolae, Anamaria, Philip, Dennis·2015·Review of Finance

Abstract

This article studies the importance of stock market literacy and trust for stock ownership decisions. We find that these two distinct channels simultaneously explain not only the probability of participation, but, conditional on participation, also explain the share of investment in stocks. Once we account for stock market literacy, sociability is no longer significant for participation; what matters is literacy rather than sociability. Further, we observe that economic shocks and future expectations are key behavioral characteristics that explain a household’s decision to invest in stocks. However, upon participation, a larger set of behavioral characteristics explains the level of stock investment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/rof/rfu040

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Financial sophistication is positively associated with the conditional magnitude of investing in stocks for U.S. households who do hold stocks in their portfolios.

    “In addition, they show a positive association between financial sophistication and the conditional magnitude of investing in stocks for those households who do hold stocks in their portfolios.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Balloch et al. (2015)

  • Among U.S. retail investors, stock market literacy positively correlates with their likelihood of stock market participation, besides trust.

    “In a related study among retail investors in the U.S., Balloch et al. (2015) find that, besides trust, stock market literacy positively correlates with their likelihood of stock market participation.”

    From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Balloch et al. (2015)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balloch, A., Nicolae, A., & Philip, D.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Venue
Review of Finance
Published
2014-09-18
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
1925-1963
ISSN
  • 1382-6662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-692X
  • 1572-3097
OpenAlex
W3125330875
Cited by
187
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
24.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Finance Review (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Scholarship Commission
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Keywords
trust, stock ownership, stock market participation, sociability, economic shocks, future expectations, behavioral characteristics, household finance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review