Stock Market Literacy, Trust, and Participation
Open accessAbstract
This article studies the importance of stock market literacy and trust for stock ownership decisions. We find that these two distinct channels simultaneously explain not only the probability of participation, but, conditional on participation, also explain the share of investment in stocks. Once we account for stock market literacy, sociability is no longer significant for participation; what matters is literacy rather than sociability. Further, we observe that economic shocks and future expectations are key behavioral characteristics that explain a household’s decision to invest in stocks. However, upon participation, a larger set of behavioral characteristics explains the level of stock investment.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Financial sophistication is positively associated with the conditional magnitude of investing in stocks for U.S. households who do hold stocks in their portfolios.
“In addition, they show a positive association between financial sophistication and the conditional magnitude of investing in stocks for those households who do hold stocks in their portfolios.”
From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Balloch et al. (2015)
Among U.S. retail investors, stock market literacy positively correlates with their likelihood of stock market participation, besides trust.
“In a related study among retail investors in the U.S., Balloch et al. (2015) find that, besides trust, stock market literacy positively correlates with their likelihood of stock market participation.”
From Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior (2017) · cites this paper as Balloch et al. (2015)
Cites
Financial literacy and stock market participation
van Rooij, M., Lusardi, A., & Alessie, R. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.006 · Cited by 3,554 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…and Nagel, 2011), educational attainment and (cid:133)nancial sophistication (Christelis et al., 2011), (cid:133)nancial literacy (Cardak and Wilkins, 2009; Van Rooij et al., 2011), cognitive ability (Benjamin et al., 2013), and sociability (Hong et al., 2004; B(cid:246)nte and Filipiak, 2012).”
Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355397555280 · Cited by 2,400 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Financial literacy, financial advice, and financial behavior
Stolper, O. A., & Walter, A. (2017) · Journal of Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11573-017-0853-9 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
“Panel A lists the available surveys for Germany, Panel B contains European household surveys and Panel C (Panel D) refers to surveys conducted in the U.S. (in other countries).”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, T., Lee, B.-K., & Lee-Geiller, S. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102098 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
- Authors
- Balloch, A., Nicolae, A., & Philip, D.
- Affiliations
- Durham University (GB)
- Venue
- Review of Finance
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-09-18
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1925-1963
- ISSN
- 1382-6662 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-692X
- 1572-3097
- OpenAlex
- W3125330875
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 24.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Finance Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Commonwealth Scholarship Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy and Behavior
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Keywords
- trust, stock ownership, stock market participation, sociability, economic shocks, future expectations, behavioral characteristics, household finance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review