Cited by 441Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAttachment and Relationship DynamicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 103 of the 103 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love

Open access
Acevedo, Bianca P., Aron, Arthur, Fisher, Helen E., Brown, Lucy L.·2012·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

The present study examined the neural correlates of long-term intense romantic love using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). Ten women and 7 men married an average of 21.4 years underwent fMRI while viewing facial images of their partner. Control images included a highly familiar acquaintance; a close, long-term friend; and a low-familiar person. Effects specific to the intensely loved, long-term partner were found in: (i) areas of the dopamine-rich reward and basal ganglia system, such as the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and dorsal striatum, consistent with results from early-stage romantic love studies; and (ii) several regions implicated in maternal attachment, such as the globus pallidus (GP), substantia nigra, Raphe nucleus, thalamus, insular cortex, anterior cingulate and posterior cingulate. Correlations of neural activity in regions of interest with widely used questionnaires showed: (i) VTA and caudate responses correlated with romantic love scores and inclusion of other in the self; (ii) GP responses correlated with friendship-based love scores; (iii) hypothalamus and posterior hippocampus responses correlated with sexual frequency; and (iv) caudate, septum/fornix, posterior cingulate and posterior hippocampus responses correlated with obsession. Overall, results suggest that for some individuals the reward-value associated with a long-term partner may be sustained, similar to new love, but also involves brain systems implicated in attachment and pair-bonding.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsq092

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 103 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1037//0022-3514.63.4.596 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Berscheid E Hatfield [Walster] EH . Interpersonal Attraction. New York: Addison-Wesley;.
  3. 10.1176/appi.ajp.161.10.1783 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hendrick S Hendrick C . Romantic Love. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1992.
  5. 10.1037//0022-3514.73.4.758 · DOI
  6. 10.1037//0033-295X.93.2.119 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 440

Metadata

Authors
Acevedo, B. P., Aron, A., Fisher, H. E., & Brown, L. L.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2011-01-05
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
145-159
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2011594069
Cited by
441
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 14
FWCI
24.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stony Brook University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
romantic love, neural correlates, ventral tegmental area, caudate nucleus, reward systems, maternal attachment, pair bonding, sexual frequency, obsession, self-inclusion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Emotions, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Love, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Obsessive Behavior, Reward, Sexual Behavior, Ventral Tegmental Area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review