Cited by 12Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Neural Representations of the Committed Romantic Partner in the Nucleus Accumbens

Open access
Ueda, Ryuhei, Abe, Nobuhito·2021·Psychological Science

Abstract

Having an intimate romantic relationship is an important aspect of life. Dopamine-rich reward regions, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), have been identified as neural correlates for both emotional bonding with the partner and interest in unfamiliar attractive nonpartners. Here, we aimed to disentangle the overlapping functions of the NAcc using multivoxel pattern analysis, which can decode the cognitive processes encoded in particular neural activity. During functional MRI scanning, 46 romantically involved men performed the social-incentive-delay task, in which a successful response resulted in the presentation of a dynamic and positive facial expression from their partner and unfamiliar women. Multivoxel pattern analysis revealed that the spatial patterns of NAcc activity could successfully discriminate between romantic partners and unfamiliar women during the period in which participants anticipated the target presentation. We speculate that neural activity patterns within the NAcc represent the relationship partner, which might be a key neural mechanism for committed romantic relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/09567976211021854

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Spatial activation patterns in the NAc can be discriminated between viewing one's partner and viewing an opposite-sex close friend.

    “Furthermore, spatial activation patterns in the NAc can be discriminated between viewing one’s partner and viewing an opposite-sex close friend, suggesting that neural representations specific to the partner may exist, akin to the putative neural engrams encoding partner cues in the NAc, BLA, and hippocampus of rodents [150].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ueda, R., & Abe, N.
Affiliations
Kyoto University (JP)
Corresponding author
Ueda, Ryuhei
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2021-11-25
Volume
32
Issue
12
Pages
1884-1895
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W3217236220
Cited by
12
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion)
  • Kyoto University Research Information Repository (Kyoto University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP17J01776, JP19H00628, JP19J00890)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, romantic relationships, social reward, facial expressions, multi-voxel pattern analysis, partner identification, affective bonds
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Love, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Sexual Partners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review