Cited by 50Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Shared neural basis of social and non-social reward deficits in chronic cocaine users

Open access
Tobler, Philippe N., Preller, Katrin H., Campbell-Meiklejohn, Daniel K., Kirschner, Matthias, Kraehenmann, Rainer, Stämpfli, Philipp, Herdener, Marcus, Seifritz, Erich +1 more·2016·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Changed reward functions have been proposed as a core feature of stimulant addiction, typically observed as reduced neural responses to non-drug-related rewards. However, it was unclear yet how specific this deficit is for different types of non-drug rewards arising from social and non-social reinforcements. We used functional neuroimaging in cocaine users to investigate explicit social reward as modeled by agreement of music preferences with music experts. In addition, we investigated non-social reward as modeled by winning desired music pieces. The study included 17 chronic cocaine users and 17 matched stimulant-naive healthy controls. Cocaine users, compared with controls, showed blunted neural responses to both social and non-social reward. Activation differences were located in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex overlapping for both reward types and, thus, suggesting a non-specific deficit in the processing of non-drug rewards. Interestingly, in the posterior lateral orbitofrontal cortex, social reward responses of cocaine users decreased with the degree to which they were influenced by social feedback from the experts, a response pattern that was opposite to that observed in healthy controls. The present results suggest that cocaine users likely suffer from a generalized impairment in value representation as well as from an aberrant processing of social feedback.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsw030

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Deficits in reward processing occur in major depressive disorder, substance use disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, schizophrenia, and ADHD.

    “Deficits in reward processing are found in MDD (Admon and Pizzagalli, 2015), substance use disorders (Garfield et al., 2014; Tobler et al., 2016), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Kalebasi et al., 2015), schizophrenia (McCarthy et al., 2016), and ADHD (van Hulst et al., 2016).”

    From The effects of early life stress on reward processing (2018) · cites this paper as Tobler et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tobler, P. N., Preller, K. H., Campbell-Meiklejohn, D. K., Kirschner, M., Kraehenmann, R., Stämpfli, P., Herdener, M., Seifritz, E., & Quednow, B. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, University of Zurich, Psychiatric Hospital, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2016-03-12
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1025
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2304927519
Cited by
50
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RERO DOC (Universität Bern) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (123516, 150739, 146326, 128574)
  • Olga Mayenfisch Stiftung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
cocaine dependence, social reward, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, orbitofrontal cortex, social feedback, value representation, stimulant use disorder
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Reward, Social Perception, Prefrontal Cortex, Cocaine-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review