Cited by 340Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Treatment and AccessMental Health and Psychiatry

The Continuum of Psychotic Symptoms in the General Population: A Cross-national Study

Open access
Nuevo, R., Chatterji, S., Verdes, E., Naidoo, N., Arango, C., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L.·2012·Schizophrenia Bulletin

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the cross-national prevalence of psychotic symptoms in the general population and to analyze their impact on health status. METHOD: The sample was composed of 256,445 subjects (55.9% women), from nationally representative samples of 52 countries worldwide participating in the World Health Organization's World Health Survey. Standardized and weighted prevalence of psychotic symptoms were calculated in addition to the impact on health status as assessed by functioning in multiple domains. RESULTS: Overall prevalences for specific symptoms ranged from 4.80% (SE = 0.14) for delusions of control to 8.37% (SE = 0.20) for delusions of reference and persecution. Prevalence figures varied greatly across countries. All symptoms of psychosis produced a significant decline in health status after controlling for potential confounders. There was a clear change in health impact between subjects not reporting any symptom and those reporting at least one symptom (effect size of 0.55). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of the presence of at least one psychotic symptom has a wide range worldwide varying as much as from 0.8% to 31.4%. Psychotic symptoms signal a problem of potential public health concern, independent of the presence of a full diagnosis of psychosis, as they are common and are related to a significant decrement in health status. The presence of at least one psychotic symptom is related to a significant poorer health status, with a regular linear decrement in health depending on the number of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/schbul/sbq099

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nuevo, R., Chatterji, S., Verdes, E., Naidoo, N., Arango, C., & Ayuso-Mateos, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES)
Venue
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Published
2010-09-13
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
475-485
ISSN
  • 0586-7614 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-1701
OpenAlex
W2130436487
Cited by
340
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 19
FWCI
12.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
psychotic symptoms, general population
MeSH terms
Adult, Africa, Asia, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Delusions, Europe, Female, Hallucinations, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, North America, Psychotic Disorders, South America, World Health Organization, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review