Cited by 128Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and Wakefulness ResearchCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Subjective Sleepiness Ratings: The Effects of Sleep Deprivation, Circadian Rhythmicity and Cognitive Performance

Babkoff, Harvey, Caspy, Tamir, Hishikawa, Y., Mikulincer, Mario·1991·Sleep

Abstract

Computerized self-report sleepiness scales were administered before and after cognitive testing in a 72-hour sleep deprivation study. The cognitive test battery was administered every 2 hours and took approximately 1-1.25 hours. Two computerized measures of subjective sleepiness were used, one a visual analog scale, the other a Hebrew version of the Stanford sleepiness scale. The results indicated that both accumulated sleep loss, circadian and ultradian (2 cycles/day) factors were significant in determining subjective estimates of sleepiness. The extent of the differences between subjective sleepiness ratings before cognitive testing and after testing was dependent upon the phase of the circadian cycle. These differences were greatest at approximately 0200-0600 hours and least around 1000 hours. A second low point occurred at 1800-2000 hours. Analysis by complex demodulation of the individual subjects' sleepiness rating curves indicated that the amount of variance accounted for by the circadian component increased significantly after cognitive testing.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/14.6.534

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Babkoff, H., Caspy, T., Hishikawa, Y., & Mikulincer, M.
Affiliations
  • Naval Health Research Center (US)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
Corresponding author
Babkoff, Harvey
Venue
Sleep
Published
1991-11-01
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
534-539
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W76740200
Cited by
128
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Office of Naval Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
subjective sleepiness, sleep deprivation, circadian rhythm, ultradian rhythms, cognitive performance, Stanford Sleepiness Scale, visual analogue scale, complex demodulation, circadian phase, cognitive assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Attention, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Problem Solving, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Mental Recall, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep Stages

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review