The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Relative Bioavailability and Metabolism of Bisphenol A in Rats Is Dependent upon the Route of Administration
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) is used to produce polymers for food contact applications, thus there is potential for oral exposure of humans to trace amounts via the diet. BPA was weakly estrogenic in screening assays measuring uterine weight/response, although much higher oral doses of BPA were required to elicit a uterotropic response as compared to other routes of administration. The objective of this study was to determine if a route dependency exists in the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of 14C-labeled BPA following single oral (po), intraperitoneal (ip), or subcutaneous (sc) doses of either 10 or 100 mg/kg to Fischer 344 rats. Results indicated a marked route dependency in the pharmacokinetics of BPA. The relative bioavailability of BPA and plasma radioactivity was markedly lower following oral administration as compared to sc or ip administration. The major fraction of plasma radioactivity following oral dosing was the monoglucuronide conjugate of BPA (68-100% of plasma radioactivity). BPA was the major component in plasma at Cmax following sc or ip administration exceeded only by BPA-monoglucuronide in females dosed ip. Up to four additional unidentified metabolites were present only in the plasma of animals dosed ip or sc. One of these, found only following ip administration, was tentatively identified as the monosulfate conjugate of BPA. The monoglucuronide conjugate was the major urinary metabolite; unchanged BPA was the principal component excreted in feces. These results demonstrated a route dependency of BPA bioavailability in rats, with oral administration resulting in the lowest bioavailability, and offer an explanation for the apparent route differences in estrogenic potency observed for BPA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exposure of the U.S. Population to Bisphenol A and 4- tertiary -Octylphenol: 2003–2004
Calafat, A. M., Ye, X., Wong, L.-Y., Reidy, J. A., & Needham, L. L. (2008) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.10753 · Cited by 1,743
In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies
Richter, C. A., Birnbaum, L. S., Farabollini, F., Newbold, R. R., Rubin, B. S., Talsness, C. E., Vandenbergh, J. G., Walser-Kuntz, D. R., & vom Saal, F. S. (2007) · Reproductive Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2007.06.004 · Cited by 1,147
Urinary Concentrations of Bisphenol A and 4-Nonylphenol in a Human Reference Population
Calafat, A. M., Kuklenyik, Z., Reidy, J. A., Caudill, S. P., Ekong, J., & Needham, L. L. (2005) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7534 · Cited by 1,031
Ikezuki, Y., Tsutsumi, O., Takai, Y., Kamei, Y., & Taketani, Y. (2002) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/17.11.2839 · Cited by 886
Parent bisphenol A accumulation in the human maternal-fetal-placental unit.
Schönfelder, G., Wittfoht, W., Hopp, H., Talsness, C. E., Paul, M., & Chahoud, I. (2002) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.021100703 · Cited by 668
Metadata
- Authors
- Pottenger, L. H.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-03-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-18
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168148786
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relative Bioavailability and Metabolism of Bisphenol A in Rats Is Dependent upon the Route of Administration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/54.1.3
- The paper
- Pottenger, L. H. (2000). The Relative Bioavailability and Metabolism of Bisphenol A in Rats Is Dependent upon the Route of Administration. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/54.1.3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.