Cited by 886Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactHealth, Environment, Cognitive Aging

Determination of bisphenol A concentrations in human biological fluids reveals significant early prenatal exposure

Ikezuki, Y., Tsutsumi, O., Takai, Y., Kamei, Y., Taketani, Y.·2002·Human Reproduction

Abstract

Background There is broad human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA), an estrogenic endocrine-disrupting chemical widely used for the production of plastic products. BPA is reported to affect preimplantation embryos or fetuses and alter their postnatal development at doses typically found in the environment. We measured contamination of BPA in various kinds of human biological fluids by a novel enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Methods Blood samples were obtained from healthy premenopausal women, women with early and full-term pregnancy, and umbilical cord at full-term delivery. Ovarian follicular fluids obtained during IVF procedures and amniotic fluids obtained at mid-term and full-term pregnancy were also subject to BPA measurements. Results BPA was present in serum and follicular fluid at approximately 1-2 ng/ml, as well as in fetal serum and full-term amniotic fluid, confirming passage through the placenta. Surprisingly, an approximately 5-fold higher concentration, 8.3 +/- 8.7 ng/ml, was revealed in amniotic fluid at 15-18 weeks gestation, compared with other fluids. Conclusion These results suggest accumulation of BPA in early fetuses and significant exposure during the prenatal period, which must be considered in evaluating the potential for human exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/17.11.2839

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikezuki, Y., Tsutsumi, O., Takai, Y., Kamei, Y., & Taketani, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2002-11-01
Volume
17
Issue
11
Pages
2839-2841
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2109879710
Cited by
886
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 50
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Keywords
bisphenol A, endocrine disruptors, prenatal exposure, human body fluids, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, follicular fluid, placental transfer, early pregnancy, plastic contaminants
MeSH terms
Bisphenol A Compounds, Air Pollutants, Occupational, Amniotic Fluid, Benzhydryl Compounds, Body Fluids, Female, Fetal Blood, Fetus, Humans, Osmolar Concentration, Phenols, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Pregnancy Trimester, Second, Pregnancy Trimester, Third, Follicular Fluid, Delivery, Obstetric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review