Cited by 765Endometriosis Research and TreatmentOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentMetastasis and carcinoma case studies

ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA OF THE OVARY, ARISING IN ENDOMETRIAL TISSUE IN THAT ORGAN

SAMPSON, JOHN A.·1925·Archives of Surgery

Abstract

Many interesting and important problems have presented themselves to clinicians and pathologists, who have appreciated the frequency of ectopic endometrium-like tissue in the pelvis and have had an opportunity to observe the various lesions in the ovaries and other pelvic structures resulting from this tissue. One of the most interesting problems is the source of these implantation-like lesions occurring on the surface of the various pelvic structures. Are they true implantations derived primarily from uterine or tubal epithelium escaping through the tubes into the peritoneal cavity, as the study of many of these lesions in human beings indicates1and as Jacobson,2in the autotransplantation of endometrial tissue in rabbits, has experimentally proved possible, or are they derived from scattered localized metaplasias of the serosal mesothelium or from developmental inclusions of portions of the Wolffian body or Müllerian duct? This problem has not yet been definitely solved to the

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archsurg.1925.01120100007001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sampson defined three criteria for diagnosing an endometriosis-related neoplasm: evidence of endometriosis in proximity to the tumor, absence of another primary site tumor, and histological evidence consistent with an endometrial origin.

    “Sampson et al. defined three criteria for diagnosing an endometriosis-related neoplasm: (1) evidence of endometriosis in proximity to the tumor, (2) absence of another primary site tumor, and (3) histological evidence consistent with an endometrial origin [3].”
  • Sampson (1925) proposed three criteria for the diagnosis of malignancy arising from endometriosis: presence of both benign and neoplastic endometrial tissues in the tumor, endometrial histology, and absence of additional tumor.

    “In 1925, Sampson (1925) proposed 3 criteria for the diagnosis of malignancy arising from endometriosis: (1) presence of both benign and neoplastic endometrial tissues in the tumor, (2) endometrial histology, and (3) absence of additional tumor.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SAMPSON, J. A.
Corresponding author
SAMPSON, JOHN A.
Venue
Archives of Surgery
Published
1925-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
0004-0010 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2065847037
Cited by
765
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
FWCI
13.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Surgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Metastasis and carcinoma case studies
Keywords
endometriosis, endometrial cancer, endometrioma, ectopic endometrium, implantation, metaplasia, Müllerian duct remnants, autologous transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review