CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 16Liver physiology and pathologyConnective Tissue Growth Factor ResearchHippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α negatively regulates connective tissue growth factor during liver regeneration

Open access
Zhou, Junmei, Sun, Xiaowei, Yang, Lu, Wang, Liqun, Ran, Gai, Wang, Jinhui, Cao, Qi, Wu, Lizi, Bryant, Andrew, Ling, Chen, Pi, Liya·2020·The FASEB Journal
DOI 10.1096/fj.201902382rPMC PMC7722640
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Liver regeneration after injury requires fine‐tune regulation of connective tissue growth factor (Ctgf). It also involves dynamic expression of hepatocyte nuclear factor (Hnf)4α, Yes‐associated protein (Yap), and transforming growth factor (Tgf)‐β. The upstream inducers of Ctgf, such as Yap, etc, are well‐known. However, the negative regulator of Ctgf remains unclear. Here, we investigated the Hnf4α regulation of Ctgf post‐various types of liver injury. Both wild‐type animals and animals contained siRNA‐mediated Hnf4α knockdown and Cre‐mediated Ctgf conditional deletion were used. We observed that Ctgf induction was associated with Hnf4α decline, nuclear Yap accumulation, and Tgf‐β upregulation during early stage of liver regeneration. The Ctgf promoter contained an Hnf4α binding sequence that overlapped with the cis ‐regulatory element for Yap and Tgf‐β. Ctgf loss attenuated inflammation, hepatocyte proliferation, and collagen synthesis, whereas Hnf4α knockdown enhanced Ctgf induction and liver fibrogenesis. These findings provided a new mechanism about fine‐tuned regulation of Ctgf through Hnf4α antagonism of Yap and Tgf‐β activities to balance regenerative and fibrotic signals.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.201902382r

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Ctgf deficiency is associated with reduced inflammation, hepatocyte proliferation, and collagen production after liver damage caused by ethanol/CCl4 co‐treatment. Ctgfk/k and Ctgff/f mice were subjected to ethanol/CCl4 co‐treatment and were sacrificed at day 1 after CCl4 administration. (A‐C) Ctgf loss was confirmed by qRT‐PCR analysis (A), Western blotting (B) and IHC staining (C). Downregulated Tnfα and IL1α expression in the damaged Ctgfk/k livers were examined by qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and ELISA assays (E). (F) IHC staining showed that Ctgf deficiency reduced recruitment of CD11b+ macrophages and number of Ki67+ proliferating hepatocytes. Scale bar: 10 μm. Quantification was calculated from 10 random fields at 200× magnification based on staining of three different livers per group. Data are means ± SD (n = 3 per group). *P < .05 and **P < .005 (Student's t‐test)
Figure 1 Ctgf deficiency is associated with reduced inflammation, hepatocyte proliferation, and collagen production after liver damage caused by ethanol/CCl4 co‐treatment. Ctgfk/k and Ctgff/f mice were subjected to ethanol/CCl4 co‐treatment and were sacrificed at day 1 after CCl4 administration. (A‐C) Ctgf loss was confirmed by qRT‐PCR analysis (A), Western blotting (B) and IHC staining (C). Downregulated Tnfα and IL1α expression in the damaged Ctgfk/k livers were examined by qRT‐PCR analysis (D) and ELISA assays (E). (F) IHC staining showed that Ctgf deficiency reduced recruitment of CD11b+ macrophages and number of Ki67+ proliferating hepatocytes. Scale bar: 10 μm. Quantification was calculated from 10 random fields at 200× magnification based on staining of three different livers per group. Data are means ± SD (n = 3 per group). *P < .05 and **P < .005 (Student's t‐test)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Ctgf upregulation is associated with loss of Hnf4α as well as activation of Yap and Smad3 after EtOH/CCl4‐induced liver injury. A, Western blotting determined expression patterns of tested genes in mouse livers after EtOH‐fed/CCl4 co‐treatment. B, IHC labeled Hnf4α, Yap, Ctgf and GS on EtOH‐fed livers that received oil or CCl4 administration. C and D, Dual staining showed periportal co‐localization of Ctgf and Hnf4α protein after liver injury. Arrows indicate the same periportal areas in each set of images. Scale bar: 100 μm
Figure 2 Ctgf upregulation is associated with loss of Hnf4α as well as activation of Yap and Smad3 after EtOH/CCl4‐induced liver injury. A, Western blotting determined expression patterns of tested genes in mouse livers after EtOH‐fed/CCl4 co‐treatment. B, IHC labeled Hnf4α, Yap, Ctgf and GS on EtOH‐fed livers that received oil or CCl4 administration. C and D, Dual staining showed periportal co‐localization of Ctgf and Hnf4α protein after liver injury. Arrows indicate the same periportal areas in each set of images. Scale bar: 100 μmCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Ctgf upregulation is associated with transient decline of Hnf4α during early stage of liver regeneration following PH. Ctgf and key regulators for transcriptional reprogramming were examined by qRT‐PCR analysis (A) and Western blotting (B and C) in PH‐treated livers. Results in (A) were means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). *P < .05 and **P < .005 relative to tested genes of control group (0 hr). (D) IHC labeled Hnf4α, Yap, Ctgf, and the pericentral hepatocyte marker GS on PH treated livers. (E) Two sets of images are low and high magnifications of consecutive sections showing Ctgf in Hnf4α+ periportal hepatocytes. (F) The immunofluorescent staining confirmed Ctgf localization in Hnf4α+ periportal areas. Image were taken in the same areas for Ctgf (red) and Hnf4α (green). DAPI was stained for nucleus. Scale bar: 100 μm. hr, hour; PT, portal tract; CV, central vein
Figure 3 Ctgf upregulation is associated with transient decline of Hnf4α during early stage of liver regeneration following PH. Ctgf and key regulators for transcriptional reprogramming were examined by qRT‐PCR analysis (A) and Western blotting (B and C) in PH‐treated livers. Results in (A) were means ± SEM (n = 5 per group). *P < .05 and **P < .005 relative to tested genes of control group (0 hr). (D) IHC labeled Hnf4α, Yap, Ctgf, and the pericentral hepatocyte marker GS on PH treated livers. (E) Two sets of images are low and high magnifications of consecutive sections showing Ctgf in Hnf4α+ periportal hepatocytes. (F) The immunofluorescent staining confirmed Ctgf localization in Hnf4α+ periportal areas. Image were taken in the same areas for Ctgf (red) and Hnf4α (green). DAPI was stained for nucleus. Scale bar: 100 μm. hr, hour; PT, portal tract; CV, central veinCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Hnf4α knockdown enhances Ctgf upregulation and liver fibrogenesis after ethanol/CCl4 treatment. A and B, Out of four Hnf4α siRNAs (siHnf4α), #3 in piLentivirus vector had the highest efficiency to inhibit Hnf4α mRNA (A) and protein (B) in Hep1‐6 cells. Values in (A) were average ± SD from triplicated experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .005 relative to scramble controls. C‐E, Hnf4α knockdown in ethanol/CCl4 treated livers carrying piLentivirus‐siHnf4α#3 caused increased expression of Ctgf, αSMA, and Collagen type I genes as determined by RT‐PCR (C), Western blotting (D), and IHC (E). Stained areas were quantified based on image analysis of at least 10 random fields (200× magnification). Data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3 animals per group). *P < .05 (Student's t test)
Figure 4 Hnf4α knockdown enhances Ctgf upregulation and liver fibrogenesis after ethanol/CCl4 treatment. A and B, Out of four Hnf4α siRNAs (siHnf4α), #3 in piLentivirus vector had the highest efficiency to inhibit Hnf4α mRNA (A) and protein (B) in Hep1‐6 cells. Values in (A) were average ± SD from triplicated experiments. *P < .05 and **P < .005 relative to scramble controls. C‐E, Hnf4α knockdown in ethanol/CCl4 treated livers carrying piLentivirus‐siHnf4α#3 caused increased expression of Ctgf, αSMA, and Collagen type I genes as determined by RT‐PCR (C), Western blotting (D), and IHC (E). Stained areas were quantified based on image analysis of at least 10 random fields (200× magnification). Data were expressed as means ± SEM (n = 3 animals per group). *P < .05 (Student's t test)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Hnf4α binds to CTGF promoter and exhibits antagonistic effects on Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 activities in vitro. A, A diagram shows cis‐elements in wild‐type human CTGF promoter (WT‐CTGFp) and mutant CTGFp. B, Myc‐tagged regulators were expressed in HEK293 cells and their binding to WT‐CTGFp was verified in ChIP assays. Fold enrichment data were expressed as means ± SEM from triplicated experiments. **P < .005 (Student's t test). C, Hnf4α activated WT‐CTGFp but not mutant CTGFp in HEK293 cells. D, Gel shift assays detected specific complexes of Hnf4α:Myc with a biotinylated WT probe, which could form super‐shifted bands with Hnf4α antibody (Ab) or combined treatment with Myc Ab. Excessive cold WT or labeled mutant probes competed with or disrupted the probe DNA/protein complex formation. E and F, Downregulation of HNF4α enhanced WT‐CTGFp activities in HepG2 cells, whereas HEK293 cells that overexpressed Hnf4α gene exhibited decrease in WT‐CTGFp activities. Data in (C, E and F) were expressed as means ± SD from triplicate tests. *P < .05 (Student’s t test)
Figure 5 Hnf4α binds to CTGF promoter and exhibits antagonistic effects on Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 activities in vitro. A, A diagram shows cis‐elements in wild‐type human CTGF promoter (WT‐CTGFp) and mutant CTGFp. B, Myc‐tagged regulators were expressed in HEK293 cells and their binding to WT‐CTGFp was verified in ChIP assays. Fold enrichment data were expressed as means ± SEM from triplicated experiments. **P < .005 (Student's t test). C, Hnf4α activated WT‐CTGFp but not mutant CTGFp in HEK293 cells. D, Gel shift assays detected specific complexes of Hnf4α:Myc with a biotinylated WT probe, which could form super‐shifted bands with Hnf4α antibody (Ab) or combined treatment with Myc Ab. Excessive cold WT or labeled mutant probes competed with or disrupted the probe DNA/protein complex formation. E and F, Downregulation of HNF4α enhanced WT‐CTGFp activities in HepG2 cells, whereas HEK293 cells that overexpressed Hnf4α gene exhibited decrease in WT‐CTGFp activities. Data in (C, E and F) were expressed as means ± SD from triplicate tests. *P < .05 (Student’s t test)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 6 A model about Ctgf regulation by Hnf4α, Yap, and Tgf‐β/Smad3 signaling during liver regeneration. Hepatocytes exit quiescence after injury and reset transcriptional programs regulated by Hnf4α and Yap for regeneration. Failure to regenerate causes scarring that overproduces profibrotic factors such as Ctgf and Tgf‐β. We propose that Ctgf production is a result of transient reprogramming in regenerating livers characterized by Hnf4α decline in conjunction with activation of Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 signaling. Hnf4α antagonism of Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 activities can downregulate Ctgf after the completion of liver regeneration. Otherwise, profibrotic signals are sustained leading to overproduction of Ctgf protein that may potentiate Tgf‐β actions and promote hepatic stellate cell activation during liver fibrosis
Figure 6 A model about Ctgf regulation by Hnf4α, Yap, and Tgf‐β/Smad3 signaling during liver regeneration. Hepatocytes exit quiescence after injury and reset transcriptional programs regulated by Hnf4α and Yap for regeneration. Failure to regenerate causes scarring that overproduces profibrotic factors such as Ctgf and Tgf‐β. We propose that Ctgf production is a result of transient reprogramming in regenerating livers characterized by Hnf4α decline in conjunction with activation of Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 signaling. Hnf4α antagonism of Yap and Tgf‐β/Smad3 activities can downregulate Ctgf after the completion of liver regeneration. Otherwise, profibrotic signals are sustained leading to overproduction of Ctgf protein that may potentiate Tgf‐β actions and promote hepatic stellate cell activation during liver fibrosisCC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1016/j.joim.2018.11.008 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.016 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/j.joim.2018.05.002 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.008 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/hep.30405 · DOI
  6. 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.047 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/hep.24587 · DOI
  8. 10.1101/gad.1664408 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01826.x · DOI
  10. 10.1038/ncb826 · DOI
  11. 10.1002/hep.23102 · DOI
  12. 10.1186/s12864-016-2492-x · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.122359899 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/hep.27425 · DOI
  15. 10.3389/fphys.2018.00138 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/art.30074 · DOI
  17. 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.081 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01720.x · DOI
  19. 10.1096/fj.11-200154 · DOI
  20. Lin S, 2018, Mettl1/Wdr4‐mediated m(7)G tRNA methylome is required for normal mRNA translation and embryonic stem cell self‐renewal and differentiation, Mol Cell, 71, e245
  21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1038/s41467-018-06898-4 · DOI
  26. 10.1136/mp.54.3.180 · DOI
  27. 10.3390/biom6010005 · DOI
  28. 10.1152/ajpgi.00012.2008 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq280 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/S0022-2275(20)32068-X · DOI
  31. Grotendorst GR, 1996, A novel transforming growth factor beta response element controls the expression of the connective tissue growth factor gene, Cell Growth Differ, 7, 469
  32. 10.1084/jem.20111653 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1002/hep.28911 · DOI
  34. 10.1038/srep27398 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.joim.2018.05.001 · DOI
  36. 10.1002/hep.24815 · DOI
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092515 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80253-1 · DOI
  39. 10.1210/me.2006-0300 · DOI
  40. 10.1159/000430195 · DOI
  41. 10.1096/fj.15-280511 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Zhou, J., Sun, X., Yang, L., Wang, L., Ran, G., Wang, J., Cao, Q., Wu, L., Bryant, A., Ling, C., & Pi, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • Beckman Research Institute (US)
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ling, Chen
  • Pi, Liya
ORCID
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-02-14
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
4970-4983
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
DOI
10.1096/fj.201902382r
PMC
PMC7722640
OpenAlex
W3005993270
Cited by
16
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lanzhou University Institutional Repository (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (KO1AA024174, R01AA028035)
  • Research and Development (2018YFA0109400)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Connective Tissue Growth Factor Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
Keywords
HNF4α, connective tissue growth factor, liver regeneration, liver fibrosis, YAP, TGF-beta, hepatocyte proliferation, collagen synthesis, liver injury, inflammation
MeSH terms
YAP-Signaling Proteins, Animals, Collagen, Humans, Liver Regeneration, Protein Binding, Up-Regulation, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Cell Cycle Proteins, Hepatocytes, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Cell Proliferation, Mice, Hepatocyte Nuclear Factor 4, Connective Tissue Growth Factor, Hep G2 Cells, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α negatively regulates connective tissue growth factor during liver regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1096/fj.201902382r
The paper
Zhou, J., Sun, X., Yang, L., Wang, L., Ran, G., Wang, J., Cao, Q., Wu, L., Bryant, A., Ling, C., & Pi, L. (2020). Hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α negatively regulates connective tissue growth factor during liver regeneration. The FASEB Journal. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201902382r