The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones
Abstract
A tool is an extension of the hand in both a physical and a perceptual sense. The presence of body schemata has been postulated as the basis of the perceptual assimilation of tool and hand. We trained macaque monkeys to retrieve distant objects using a rake, and neuronal activity was recorded in the caudal postcentral gyrus where the somatosensory and visual signals converge. There we found a large number of bimodal neurones which appeared to code the schema of the hand. During tool use, their visual receptive fields were altered to include the entire length of the rake or to cover the expanded accessible space. These findings may represent neural correlates of the modified schema of the hand in which the tool was incorporated.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These additional regions encode diverse information related to one’s own body or the body of others, as well as their spatial position (such as PoCG, SII, LOC, or cerebellar lobule VI) (lriki et al. 1996; Disbrow et al. 2000; Grodd et al. 2001; Eickhoff et al. 2010; Bernasconi et al. 2018; Sonobe et al. 2023), visual and auditory space representation and movement detection (such as PT, STS, POS,”
From Neuroanatomical correlates of peripersonal space: bridging the gap between perception, action, emotion and social cognition (2024) · cites this paper as lriki et al. 1996
In the citing paper
“Tool use may cause changes in visuo-tactile integration (39–41) and in the receptive fields of visuo-tactile cells in the parietal cortex (42), so that it appears as if peripersonal space extends from the hand to the tool.”
From Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. (2007) · cites this paper as [42]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 999
Auditory, tactile, and audiotactile information processing following visual deprivation
Occelli, V., Spence, C., & Zampini, M. (2013) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0028416 · Cited by 43
Davies, A. M. A., White, R. C., & Davies, M. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.03.006 · Cited by 40
Riva, G., Waterworth, J. A., & Murray, D. M. (2014) · doi:10.2478/9783110409697.1 · Cited by 44
Visual illusion of tool use recalibrates tactile perception
Miller, L. E., Longo, M. R., & Saygın, A. P. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.01.022 · Cited by 41
“In addition, these parietal regions are also known to play a role in tool embodiment (Iriki et al., 1996; Quallo et al., 2009), and are functionally coupled with the primary somatosensory cortex (Cooke et al., 2014).”
BackgroundPeri-personal Space as a Prior in Coupling Visual and Proprioceptive Signals
Noel, J.-P., Samad, M., Doxon, A., Clark, J., Keller, S., & Di Luca, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33961-3 · Cited by 39
Perceived Heaviness Is Influenced by the Style of Lifting
Amazeen, E. L., Tseng, P. H., Valdez, A. B., et al. (2011) · Ecological Psychology · doi:10.1080/10407413.2011.539100 · Cited by 42
“Consistent with the research showing an effect of the task being performed on perception (Berti & Frassinetti, 2000; Bhalla & Proffitt, 1999; Iriki et al., 1996; Mark, 1987; Proffitt et al., 1995, Proffitt et al., 2003; Wagman & Taylor, 2005; Warren, 1984; Warren & Whang, 1987; Witt et al., 2004,…”
BackgroundMethodResultReachability and the sense of embodiment in amputees using prostheses
Gouzien, A., de Vignemont, F., Touillet, A., Martinet, N., Graaf, J. B. D., Jarrassé, N., & Roby-Brami, A. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05094-6 · Cited by 43
“In a seminal study Iriki and colleagues 6 trained monkeys to use a rake to reach food placed outside their reaching space.”
BackgroundAudio-visual sensory deprivation degrades visuo-tactile peri-personal space
Noel, J.-P., Park, H.-D., Pasqualini, I., Lissek, H., Wallace, M., Blanke, O., & Serino, A. (2018) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.04.001 · Cited by 42
Effect of tool-use observation on metric body representation and peripersonal space
Galigani, M., Castellani, N., Donno, B., Franza, M., Zuber, C., Allet, L., Garbarini, F., & Bassolino, M. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107622 · Cited by 45
“The present results are fully in agreement with previous studies (Bassolino et al., 2010; Biggio et al., 2017; Iriki et al., 1996; Neppi-Mòdona et al., 2007; Ronga et al., under review; Serino et al., 2007), showing that tool-use results in a modification of PPS by extending the typical…”
BackgroundMethodResultViewing touch improves tactile sensory threshold
Schaefer, M., Heinze, H., & Rotte, M. (2005) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200503150-00012 · Cited by 41
“[1] argued that this effect might be linked to reversible short-term plasticity of tactile receptive fields [7,8].”
BackgroundNoel, J., Bertoni, T., Terrebonne, E., Pellencin, E., Herbelin, B., Cascio, C. J., Blanke, O., Magosso, E., Wallace, M. T., & Serino, A. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa103 · Cited by 43
Immediate tool incorporation processes determine human motor planning with tools
Ganesh, G., Yoshioka, T., Osu, R., & Ikegami, T. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5524 · Cited by 41
“029; two-tailed t-test on the individual differences between tool trials and no-tool trials) but not in the sensitivity (T(10)1⁄4 1.”
InfluentialHashimoto, T., Ueno, K., Ogawa, A., Asamizuya, T., Suzuki, C., Cheng, K., Tanaka, M., Taoka, M., Iwamura, Y., Suwa, G., et al. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0417 · Cited by 41
Self-citationVisuo-tactile Integration in Personal Space
Longo, M. R., Musil, J. J., & Haggard, P. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00158 · Cited by 41
Noel, J., Blanke, O., Magosso, E., & Serino, A. (2018) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00652.2017 · Cited by 44
Brozzoli, C., Makin, T. R., Cardinali, L., Holmes, N. P., & Farnè, A. (2011) · Frontiers in neuroscience · doi:10.1201/9781439812174-29 · Cited by 68
Gentilucci, M., Roy, A. C., & Stefanini, S. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1863-8 · Cited by 41
“Indeed, single neuron recording (Iriki et al. 1996) and PET (positron emission tomography; Obayashi et al. 2002) studies conducted on monkeys have shown that IPS (intraparietal sulcus) regions can be involved in coding the representation of tools in abstract form that is distinct from the motor…”
BackgroundNoninformative Vision Causes Adaptive Changes in Tactile Sensitivity
Harris, J. A., Arabzadeh, E., Moore, C. A., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2102-07.2007 · Cited by 41
“For example, Iriki et al. (1996) described neurons in the anterior bank of the intraparietal sulcus that respond to tactile stimulation on the contralateral hand and also respond to visual stimuli in the vicinity of that hand, and the visual receptive fields of these neurons “follow” the hand as it…”
BackgroundModelling Me, Modelling You: the Autistic Self
Perrykkad, K., & Hohwy, J. (2019) · Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40489-019-00173-y · Cited by 39
Ticini, L. F., Schütz‐Bosbach, S., Weiß, C., Casile, A., & Waszak, F. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00134 · Cited by 40
“On the basis of the available nonhuman literature (eg, Graziano, 2006 ; Iriki, Iriki, Tanaka, & Iwamura, 2006 ; Fogassi et al, 2005 ; Kakei, Hoffman, & Strick, 1999 ), in this second experiment, we expected two possible scenarios during passive perception of each tone.”
BackgroundTen Years at the Multisensory Forum: Musings on the Evolution of a Field
Foxe, J. J., & Molholm, S. (2009) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-009-0102-9 · Cited by 40
Binding Personal and Peripersonal Space: Evidence from Tactile Extinction
Vaishnavi, S., Calhoun, J., & Chatterjee, A. K. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892901564243 · Cited by 40
Plasticity and Awareness of Bodily Distortion
Pazzaglia, M., & Zantedeschi, M. (2016) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2016/9834340 · Cited by 38
“…therapeutic Hindawi Publishing Corporation Neural Plasticity Volume 2016, Article ID 9834340, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9834340 strategies to correct one or more bodily distortions in people with a diseased body and an intact brain, such as those with spinal cord injuries (SCI).”
BackgroundInfluentialNew Caledonian crows use tools for non-foraging activities
Wimpenny, J. H., Weir, A. A. S., & Kacelnik, A. (2010) · Animal Cognition · doi:10.1007/s10071-010-0366-1 · Cited by 39
“the tool becomes a functional extension of the limb ( Iriki et al. 1996 ).”
MethodForce feedback facilitates multisensory integration during robotic tool use
Sengül, A., Rognini, G., van Elk, M., Aspell, J. E., Bleuler, H., & Blanke, O. (2013) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3526-0 · Cited by 39
“1 3 process visual and tactile cues (Iriki et al. 1996; Graziano et al. 1999; Graziano and Gandhi 2000).”
BackgroundShort, F., & Ward, R. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037/a0015873 · Cited by 40
Japanese Macaques as Laboratory Animals
Isa, T., Yamane, I., Hamai, M., & Inagaki, H. (2009) · EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS · doi:10.1538/expanim.58.451 · Cited by 39
Tia, B., Takemi, M., Kosugi, A., Castagnola, E., Ansaldo, A., Nakamura, T., Ricci, D., Ushiba, J., Fadiga, L., & Iriki, A. (2017) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jp274629 · Cited by 37
“…(Sequencing & Consortium, 2014) would further expand the possibilities of the research field, for instance, to investigate the molecular basis of specific neural circuitries involved in certain behaviours (e.g. Iriki et al. 1996; Ishibashi et al. 2002; Hihara et al. 2006; Quallo et al. 2009).”
BackgroundBodily self-consciousness and its disorders
Ronchi, R., Park, H.-D., & Blanke, O. (2018) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63622-5.00015-2 · Cited by 43
The Enactive Mind—From Actions to Cognition: Lessons from Autism
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R. T., & Volkmar, F. R. (2005) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9780470939345.ch26 · Cited by 46
Perception of spatial requirements for wheelchair locomotion in experienced users with Tetraplegia
Higuchi, T., Hatano, N., Soma, K., et al. (2009) · Journal of PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY · doi:10.2114/jpa2.28.15 · Cited by 37
When a laser pen becomes a stick: remapping of space by tool-use observation in hemispatial neglect
Costantini, M., Frassinetti, F., Maini, M., Ambrosini, E., Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2014) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-014-4012-z · Cited by 38
“however, several studies using a variety of techniques including single cell recording from macaque’s brain (Iriki et al. 1996), behavioral studies on both healthy (Witt et al.”
BackgroundInfluentialPia, L., Garbarini, F., Fossataro, C., Burin, D., & Berti, A. (2016) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2016.1185404 · Cited by 37
Shibuya, S., Unenaka, S., & Ohki, Y. (2016) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-016-4777-3 · Cited by 37
A hierarchical model of operational anticipation windows in driving an automobile
Tanida, K., & Pöppel, E. (2006) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-006-0152-9 · Cited by 37
“Recently, neurophysiological experiments have provided important information how objects (like in principle also a vehicle) may expand our body schema (Iriki et al. 1996; Maravita and Iriki 2004).”
BackgroundImpaired Visual Hand Recognition in Preoperative Patients during Brachial Plexus Anesthesia
Silva, S., Loubinoux, I., Olivier, M., Bataille, B., Fourcade, O., Samii, K., Jeannerod, M., & Démonet, J. (2010) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31820164f1 · Cited by 37
“In this way, the chronically deafferentated limb would become a “passive entity” definitely excluded from body image.(19,36,37) Therefore, seeing it would no longer modulate the neuronal substrates of the body image involved in both execution of hand laterality judgment and phantom limb perception (i.”
BackgroundThe Evolution of Parietal Areas Involved in Hand Use in Primates
Krubitzer, L. A., & Disbrow, E. A. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012370880-9.00352-2 · Cited by 37
Minds Online: The Interface between Web Science, Cognitive Science and the Philosophy of Mind
Smart, P. R., Clowes, R. W., & Heersmink, R. (2017) · now publishers, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1561/1800000026 · Cited by 42
The Impact of Embodiment and Avatar Sizing on Personal Space in Immersive Virtual Environments
Buck, L. E., Chakraborty, S., & Bodenheimer, B. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2022.3150483 · Cited by 40
Prevosto, V., Graf, W. M., & Ugolini, G. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2010.07541.x · Cited by 36
“…MIP is an arm movement-related area, involved in sensory guidance of reaching (Mountcastle et al., 1975; Burbaud et al., 1991; Kalaska & Crammond, 1992; Iriki et al., 1996; Johnson et al., 1996), like the more caudally located parietal reach region (Batista et al., 1999; Buneo & Andersen, 2006).”
BackgroundMultisensory integration in multiple reference frames in the posterior parietal cortex
Avillac, M., Olivier, E., Den�ve, S., Hamed, S. B., & Duhamel, J. (2004) · Cognitive Processing · doi:10.1007/s10339-004-0021-3 · Cited by 35
“Sites where multisensory integration could occur in the macaque monkey brain have been found in area 7b (Graziano and Gross 1994), the intraparietal sulcus (Colby et al. 1993; Duhamel et al. 1998; Iriki et al. 1996), the ventral premotor (PMv) area (Rizzolatti et al.”
BackgroundMechanisms of attention in touch
Lloyd, D. M., Bolanowski, S. J., HOWARD, L., & McGlone, F. P. (1999) · Somatosensory & Motor Research · doi:10.1080/08990229970609 · Cited by 35
Vision Merges With Touch in a Purely Tactile Discrimination
Arabzadeh, E., Clifford, C. W. G., & Harris, J. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02134.x · Cited by 36
Bodily Sensation and Tactile Perception
Richardson, L. (2011) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00504.x · Cited by 35
Spaccasassi, C., Romano, D., & Maravita, A. (2018) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.013 · Cited by 36
Facilitated Processing of Visual Stimuli Associated with the Body
Whiteley, L., Kennett, S., Taylor-Clarke, M., & Haggard, P. (2004) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p5053 · Cited by 36
“According to this account, the stimuli on the projector screen across the visual and tactile modalities, and their receptive fields can be altered to incorporate tools (Iriki et al 1996) and views of the body outside strictly defined peri-personal space (Iriki et al 2001).”
Your hand movements in my somatosensory cortex: a visuo-kinesthetic function in human area 2
Oouchida, Y., Okada, T., Nakashima, T., Matsumura, M., Sadato, N., & Naito, E. (2004) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200409150-00005 · Cited by 33
“Indeed, neurons in the monkey’s caudalmost part of the postcentral gyrus (area 2) and deeper anterior bank of intraparietal sulcus, which rarely respond to visual stimulation in nave monkeys, also have the capacity to respond to visual stimulation after a certain period of extensive training in visuo-motor tasks [19,2…”
BackgroundJourneying beyond classical somatosensory cortex.
Sathian, K., & Lacey, S. (2007) · Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale · doi:10.1037/cjep2007026 · Cited by 40
Listening to a conversation with aggressive content expands the interpersonal space
Vagnoni, E., Lewis, J., Tajadura‐Jiménez, A., & Cardini, F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0192753 · Cited by 34
Individual Differences in the Flexibility of Peripersonal Space
Hunley, S. B., Marker, A. M., & Lourenco, S. F. (2017) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000350 · Cited by 34
Types of abduction in tool behavior
Caruana, F., & Cuccio, V. (2015) · Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11097-015-9450-y · Cited by 32
Botvinick, M., Buxbaum, L. J., Bylsma, L. M., & Jax, S. A. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.024 · Cited by 32
“However, related studies in both humans and monkeys indicate that an attentional ‘envelope’ around the acting hand may expand to include a hand-held tool ( Iriki, Tanaka, & Iwamura, 1996; Longo & Lourenco, 2006; Maravita & Iriki, 2004), and that the pattern of attentional allocation in hemispatial neglect is similarly…”
BackgroundA novel approach to mechanical foot stimulation during human locomotion under body weight support
Gravano, S., Ivanenko, Y. P., Maccioni, G., et al. (2010) · Human Movement Science · doi:10.1016/j.humov.2010.01.002 · Cited by 34
Agency and Control for the Integration of a Virtual Tool into the Peripersonal Space
Gozli, D. G., & Brown, L. E. (2011) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p7027 · Cited by 35
“Successful interaction with the environment requires that we process relevant external information while maintaining a dynamic representation of the body and, in particular, of the effectors (eg Ehrsson et al 2004; Graziano 1999; Graziano and Gross 1998; Iriki et al 1996).”
BackgroundResultTool Use Specific Adult Neurogenesis and Synaptogenesis in Rodent (Octodon degus) Hippocampus
Kumazawa-Manita, N., Hama, H., Miyawaki, A., & Iriki, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058649 · Cited by 36
Marini, F., Tagliabue, C. F., Sposito, A. V., Arieta, A. H., Brugger, P., Estévez, N., & Maravita, A. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.017 · Cited by 33
Strategy Switching in the Stabilization of Unstable Dynamics
Zenzeri, J., Santis, D. D., & Morasso, P. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0099087 · Cited by 34
Synesthesia, Mirror Neurons, and Mirror-Touch
Banissy, M. J. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199603329.013.0030 · Cited by 33
van Elk, M., Forget, J., & Blanke, O. (2013) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.006 · Cited by 33
Robots as powerful allies for the study of embodied cognition from the bottom up
Hoffmann, M., & Pfeifer, R. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198735410.013.45 · Cited by 33
“…dynamically recruited depending on context and task; (iv) plastic – adapting over both long (ontogenesis) and short time scales, as adaptation to tool use (e.g., (Iriki et al. 1996)) or various body illusions testify (e.g., humans start feeling ownership over a rubber hand after minutes of…”
BackgroundWidening the body to rubber hands and tools: what’s the difference?
de Vignemont, F., & Farnè, A. (2010) · Revue de neuropsychologie · doi:10.3917/rne.023.0203 · Cited by 33
Stout, D., & Hecht, E. E. (2014) · Springer series in bio-/neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08500-5_7 · Cited by 40
Pulling the Finger off Disrupts Agency, Embodiment and Peripersonal Space
Newport, R., & Preston, C. (2010) · Perception · doi:10.1068/p6742 · Cited by 32
“Since the discovery that the peripersonal space of monkeys can be modified following tool use (Iriki et al 1996), several researchers have attempted to produce similar results in humans.”
ResultInvestigating the effect of a transparent barrier on the crossmodal congruency effect
Kitagawa, N., & Spence, C. J. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-004-2046-3 · Cited by 32
“Similarly it has also been reported that the active wielding of a long tool can affect visual–tactile interactions (e.g., Berti and Frassinetti 2000; Farne and Ladavas 2000; Holmes et al. 2004; Iriki et al. 1996; Maravita and Iriki 2004; Maravita et al. 2002a).”
BackgroundVisual attention by saliency leads cross-modal body representation
Hikita, M., Fuke, S., Ogino, M., Minato, T., & Asada, M. (2008) · IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) · doi:10.1109/devlrn.2008.4640822 · Cited by 32
“Especially during tool-use by monkeys, neurophysiological evidence shows that the representation can be dynamically reconstructed by spatio-temporal integration of different sensor modalities so that it can be adaptive to environmental changes [1].”
BackgroundSchizotypy and individual differences in peripersonal space plasticity
Ferroni, F., Ardizzi, M., Ferri, F., Tesanovic, A., Langiulli, N., Tonna, M., Marchesi, C., & Gallese, V. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107579 · Cited by 31
Imagined tool-use in near and far space modulates the extra-striate body area
Tomasino, B., Weiss, P. H., & Fink, G. R. (2012) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.018 · Cited by 32
“Thus, reaching for distant objects using a stick or a rake may alter the body-schema as if the hand was elongated to the tip of the tool (e.g., (Inoue et al., 2001; Iriki et al., 1996; Obayashi et al., 2001)).”
BackgroundDe l'image du corps à l'image de soi
Jeannerod, M. (2010) · Revue de neuropsychologie · doi:10.1684/nrp.2010.0095 · Cited by 33
Numerical and Spatial Intuitions: A Role for Posterior Parietal Cortex?
Hubbard, E. M., Manuela Piazza, A., Pinel, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012935.003.0201 · Cited by 38
“2001) and tools (Hihara et al. 2003; Iriki et al. 1996; Obayashi et al. 2001).”
Schaefer, M., Heinze, H., & Rotte, M. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.04.005 · Cited by 32
“Iriki et al. (1996) showed similar mechanisms in bimodal parietal neurons in the monkey brain: Using a tool led to expansion of the visual receptive field of the neurons along the length of the tool.”
MethodTool-use Extends Peripersonal Space Boundaries in Schizophrenic Patients
Ferroni, F., Ardizzi, M., Magnani, F., Ferri, F., Langiulli, N., Rastelli, F., Lucarini, V., Giustozzi, F., Volpe, R., Marchesi, C., et al. (2022) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbac067 · Cited by 32
Mirroring avatars: dissociation of action and intention in human motor resonance
BORRONI, P. F., Gorini, A., Riva, G., Bouchard, S., & Cerri, G. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07779.x · Cited by 32
Widening the body to rubber hands and tools: what’s the difference?
de Vignemont, F., & Farnè, A. (2010) · Revue de neuropsychologie · doi:10.1684/nrp.2010.0087 · Cited by 46
(2017) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/10462.001.0001 · Cited by 30
Expert Tool Users Show Increased Differentiation between Visual Representations of Hands and Tools
Schone, H. R., Maimon-Mor, R. O., Baker, C. I., & Makin, T. R. (2021) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2489-20.2020 · Cited by 31
“Previous research assessing tool embodiment, such as the influential work of Iriki and colleagues (Iriki et al., 1996), measured whether tool use affects the visual representation of hand-centered space (e.g., multisensory peripersonal space; Maravita and Iriki, 2004).”
MethodJacobs, S., Bussel, B., Combeaud, M., & Roby-Brami, A. (2008) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2007.12.009 · Cited by 34
“Research report The use of a tool requires its incorporation into the movement: Evidence from stick-pointing in apraxia Stéphane Jacobsa,b,*, Bernard Busselc, Michèle Combeaudc and Agnès Roby-Bramia,b,c aParis Descartes University, Laboratory of Neurophysics and Physiology, Paris, France bCNRS, UMR 8119, IFR 25, Pa…”
BackgroundInfluentialTowards a model for tool-body assimilation and adaptive tool-use
Nabeshima, C., Kuniyoshi, Y., & Lungarella, M. (2007) · IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning (ICDL) · doi:10.1109/devlrn.2007.4354031 · Cited by 31
“Interestingly, after only five minutes (or less) of using a hand-held rake to retrieve distant objects, the visual receptive fields of the bimodal neurons expand to include the entire length of the tool used [5] (this happens even for video-captured images of the tool projected on a video monitor [6]).”
BackgroundResultGuterstam, A., Zeberg, H., Özçiftci, V. M., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.06.004 · Cited by 30
The parietal lobe and tool use
Maravita, A., & Romano, D. (2018) · Handbook of clinical neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63622-5.00025-5 · Cited by 30
Tool use for autonomous agents
Amant, R. S., & Wood, A. B. (2005) · NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) · Cited by 31
Identifying peripersonal space boundaries in newborns
Orioli, G., Santoni, A., Dragovic, D., & Farroni, T. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45084-4 · Cited by 30
Empathy with Computer Game Characters : A Cognitive Neuroscience Perspective
Morrison, I., & Ziemke, T. (2005) · IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids) · Cited by 30
Cortical Temporal Dynamics of Visually Guided Behavior
Hinkley, L. B. N., Nagarajan, S. S., Dalal, S. S., Guggisberg, A. G., & Disbrow, E. A. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq102 · Cited by 29
“be anchored to a specific body structure such as the arm or hand (Iriki et al. 1996; Graziano et al. 1997; Duhamel et al. 1998).”
Hermit crabs perceive the extent of their virtual bodies
Sonoda, K., Asakura, A., Minoura, M., et al. (2012) · Biology Letters · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2012.0085 · Cited by 30
Evolution of Parietal Cortex in Mammals: From Manipulation to Tool Use
Goldring, A. B., & Krubitzer, L. A. (2016) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804042-3.00086-5 · Cited by 34
Noel, J., Serino, A., & Wallace, M. T. (2018) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01334 · Cited by 30
Sequential neural processes of tactile–visual crossmodal working memory
Ohara, S., Lenz, F. A., & Zhou, Y.-D. (2005) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.05.058 · Cited by 30
Armed and attentive: Holding a weapon can bias attentional priorities in scene viewing
Biggs, A. T., Brockmole, J. R., & Witt, J. K. (2013) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0538-6 · Cited by 33
Biased attention near another's hand following joint action
Sun, H.-M., & Thomas, L. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00443 · Cited by 29
Cognitive and movement measures reflect the transition to presence-at-hand
Dotov, D. G., Nie, L., Wojcik, K., Jinks, A., Yu, X., & Chemero, A. P. (2017) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2017.01.001 · Cited by 28
Tool Extension in Human-Computer Interaction
Bergström, J., Mottelson, A., Muresan, A., & Hornbæk, K. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300798 · Cited by 32
Tactile stimulation can suppress visual perception
Ide, M., & Hidaka, S. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03453 · Cited by 33
Binkofski, F., Butler, A., Buccino, G., Heide, W., Fink, G., Freund, H.-J., & Seitz, R. J. (2003) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1594-2 · Cited by 29
“Interestingly, Iriki et al. (1996) demonstrated that the body schema can be expanded spatially during tool use, as shown by recordings of macaque postcentral neurons.”
BackgroundDevelopmental Perception of the Self and Action
Saegusa, R., Giorgio Metta, B., Sandini, G., & Natale, L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2013.2271793 · Cited by 29
Body-Borne Computers as Extensions of Self
Leigh, S.-W., Sareen, H. S., Kao, H.-L., Liu, X., & Maes, P. (2017) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers6010012 · Cited by 29
“When a macaque monkey uses a rake for collecting food, its visual receptive field is enlarged to include the rake [21].”
BackgroundGigliotti, M. F., Coelho, P. S., Coutinho, J. F. P., & Coello, Y. (2019) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-019-01242-x · Cited by 28
Representation of Bodily Self in the Multimodal Parieto-Premotor Network
Murata, A., & Ishida, H. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-4-431-73021-7_6 · Cited by 30
Embodying functionally relevant action sounds in patients with spinal cord injury
Pazzaglia, M., Galli, G., Lewis, J. W., Scivoletto, G., Giannini, A. M., & Molinari, M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34133-z · Cited by 27
Experts in action: why we need an embodied social brain hypothesis
Barrett, L., Henzi, S. P., & Barton, R. A. (2021) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2020.0533 · Cited by 32
“Classic work on macaques, for example, showed that, following training with a rake-like tool that allowed them to retrieve distant food, the receptive fields of the visual neurons associated with the somatosensory receptive field of the hand were extended to include the length of the tool [69,70].”
BackgroundA touchy subject: advancing the modulated visual pathways account of altered vision near the hand
Taylor, J. E. T., Gozli, D. G., Chan, D., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2014) · Translational Neuroscience · doi:10.1515/tnsci-2015-0001 · Cited by 28
“Importantly, this neural tuning to action-relevant spaces is flexible, such that when monkeys are given a tool to increase the length of their reach, the receptive fields of their reach-selective neurons rapidly adjust in size to accommodate the new reachable space [10].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- lriki, A., Tanaka, M., & Iwamura, Y.
- Affiliations
- Toho University (JP)
- Venue
- NeuroReport
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 2325-2330
- ISSN
- 0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2119233587
- Cited by
- 1,274
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 53
- FWCI
- 3.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
- Keywords
- body schema, tool use, bimodal neurons, somatosensory cortex, visual receptive fields, perceptual assimilation, macaque, neural coding
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Body Image, Macaca, Psychomotor Performance, Spatial Behavior, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
