Cited by 98Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

Amygdala β-noradrenergic influence on hippocampal longterm potentiation in vivo

Ikegaya, Yuji, Nakanishi, Kosuke, Saito, Hiroshi, Abe, Kazuho·1997·NeuroReport

Abstract

We have previously shown that hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP), one form of synaptic plasticity that may underlie learning and memory, is attenuated by blocking neuron activity of the basolateral amygdala (BLA). In the present study we investigated the amygdala noradrenergic or cholinergic contribution to hippocampal LTP formation. When propranolol, a beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, was injected into the BLA 10 min before tetanus, the formation of LTP in the perforant path-dentate granule cell synapses was significantly impaired. Scopolamine, a muscarinic cholinergic receptor antagonist, did not affect the formation of LTP. These results suggest that amygdala beta-noradrenergic activity plays a critical role in modulation of hippocampal LTP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199709290-00027

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Input from the hypothalamus and the locus coeruleus, via activation of β-adrenergic receptors, as well as dopaminergic innervation of the hippocampus from the VTA and local release of CRH, all appear to contribute to the rapid stress-induced enhancement of hippocampal LTP.

    “In addition, input from the hypothalamus (Nakanishi et al. [216]) and the locus coeruleus (Harley and Sara [217]; Sara et al. [218]; Kitchigina et al. [219]; Bouret and Sara [220]), via activation of β-adrenergic receptors (Ikegaya et al. [221]; Vermetten and Bremner [8]; Strange and Dolan [222]; Nathan et al. [189]; Hurlemann et al. [223]), as well as the dopaminergic innervation of the”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikegaya, Y., Nakanishi, K., Saito, H., & Abe, K.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
NeuroReport
Published
1997-09
Volume
8
Issue
14
Pages
3143-3146
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120526824
Cited by
98
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hippocampal long-term potentiation, basolateral amygdala, beta-adrenergic modulation, noradrenergic neurotransmission, propranolol, synaptic plasticity, learning and memory, cholinergic modulation, scopolamine
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Amygdala, Animals, Hippocampus, Male, Propranolol, Scopolamine, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Muscarinic Antagonists, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review