Cited by 53Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismReading and Literacy DevelopmentHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience

Different neural substrates for Kanji and Kana writing: a PET study

Tokunaga, Hiromasa, Nishikawa, Takashi, Ikejiri, Yoshitaka, Nakagawa, Yoshitsugu, Yasuno, Fumihiko, Hashikawa, Kazuo, Nishimura, Tsunehiko, Sugita, Yoshiro +1 more·1999·Neuroreport

Abstract

To investigate the neural substrate underlying the mechanisms of Kanji and Kana writing, we conducted a PET activation study during mental writing task in eight right-handed normal Japanese subjects. During scans subjects were required to mentally write a Kanji or three Kana letters with their right hand, for each stimulant word presented auditorily. The direct comparisons between Kanji writing and Kana writing revealed that the left posterior inferior temporal gyrus was activated in Kanji writing while the left angular gyrus was activated in Kana writing. In addition, more extensive areas were activated in Kanji writing compared with Kana writing. These results suggest that different respective neural substrates are involved in Kanji and Kana writing respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00001756-199911080-00012

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ventral parts of the reading system were more activated for semantic reading (Kanji) than sublexical reading (Kana).

    “As irregular word reading is reliant on lexico-semantic processing, the result is consistent with prior and new claims (Kiyosawa et al., 1995; Tokunaga et al., 1999) that ventral parts of the reading system were more activated for semantic reading (Kanji) than sublexical reading (Kana).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tokunaga, H., Nishikawa, T., Ikejiri, Y., Nakagawa, Y., Yasuno, F., Hashikawa, K., Nishimura, T., Sugita, Y., & Takeda, M.
Affiliations
The University of Osaka (JP)
Venue
Neuroreport
Published
1999-11
Volume
10
Issue
16
Pages
3315-3319
ISSN
0959-4965 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086089487
Cited by
53
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroreport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Keywords
kanji writing, kana writing, neural correlates, angular gyrus, Japanese writing system, brain activation, orthographic processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Handwriting, Humans, Imagination, Functional Laterality, Male, Reference Values, Tomography, Emission-Computed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review