Participation of the left posterior inferior temporal cortex in writing and mental recall of kanji orthography
Abstract
To examine the neuropsychological mechanisms involved in writing kanji (morphograms), we used functional MRI (fMRI) in 10 normal volunteers, all right-handed, native Japanese speakers. The experimental paradigms consisted of kana-to-kanji transcription, mental recall of kanji orthography and oral reading and semantic judgement of kana words. The first two tasks require manual and mental transcription of visually presented kana words into kanji, respectively, whereas the last two tasks involve language processing of the same set of stimulus words without recall of kanji. The transcription and mental recall tasks yielded lateralized activation of the left posterior inferior temporal cortex (PITC). By contrast, neither oral reading nor semantic judgement produced similar activation of the area. These results, in good accordance with lesion data, provide converging evidence that the left PITC plays an important role in writing kanji through retrieval of their visual graphic images, and suggest language-specific cerebral organization of writing. The set of fMRI experiments also provides new neuroimaging data on the cortical localization of basic language functions in people using a non-alphabetical language.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kanji handwriting activated the left posterior inferior temporal cortex, whereas kana typing activated frontal and parietal regions.
“For example, Nakamura et al. [20] used fMRI on Japanese participants and found that kanji handwriting activated the left posterior inferior temporal cortex, whereas kana typing activated frontal and parietal regions.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Nakamura et al. found increased activation in the left temporo-occipital cortex in individuals using ideograms compared with those employing phonetic kana script.
“Nakamura et al. [20] examined nine Japanese speakers using fMRI and found increased activation in the left temporo-occipital cortex in individuals using ideograms compared with those employing phonetic kana script, indicating that the type of writing system influenced the brain activity.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [20]
Cites
‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain
Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90066-3 · Cited by 1,913 · see citing works
Puce, A., Allison, T., Asgari, M., Gore, J. C., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.16-16-05205.1996 · Cited by 987 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…materials potentially trigger the automatic activation of a widespread neural network irrespective of the behavioural tasks engaged (Price et al., 1996), and also because the ventral visual systems including the PITC may respond to both verbal and non-verbal visual materials (Puce et al., 1996).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialA multimodal language region in the ventral visual pathway
Büchel, C., Price, C., & Friston, K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28389 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
Subangular alexia without agraphia or hemianopsia
Greenblatt, S. H. (1976) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/0093-934x(76)90019-5 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Language‐specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area
Cohen, L., Lehéricy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf094 · Cited by 1,254 · see citing works
The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus
Dehaene, S., Le Clec’H, G., Poline, J.-B., Le Bihan, D., & Cohen, L. (2002) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200203040-00015 · Cited by 727 · see citing works
Frequency effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI study
Kuo, W.-J., Yeh, T.-C., Lee, C.-Y., Wu, Y. U.-T. E., Chou, C.-C., Ho, L.-T., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hsieh, J.-C. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00015-6 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Dien, J., Brian, E. S., Molfese, D. L., & Gold, B. T. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.03.008 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nakamura, K., Honda, M., Okada, T., Hanakawa, T., Toma, K., Fukuyama, H., Konishi, J., & Shibasaki, H.
- Affiliations
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Nakamura, Kimihiro
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 954-967
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1883932945
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 2.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
- Keywords
- kanji writing, visual word recognition, hemispheric lateralization, non-alphabetic writing systems, Japanese language, semantic judgment, reading aloud
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Handwriting, Humans, Japan, Language, Functional Laterality, Linguistics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Reading, Mental Recall, Temporal Lobe
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review