Cited by 1,037Neuroscience and Music PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Investigating emotion with music: An fMRI study

Open access
Koelsch, Stefan, Fritz, Thomas, v. Cramon, D. Yves, Müller, Karsten, Friederici, Angela D.·2006·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

The present study used pleasant and unpleasant music to evoke emotion and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine neural correlates of emotion processing. Unpleasant (permanently dissonant) music contrasted with pleasant (consonant) music showed activations of amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and temporal poles. These structures have previously been implicated in the emotional processing of stimuli with (negative) emotional valence; the present data show that a cerebral network comprising these structures can be activated during the perception of auditory (musical) information. Pleasant (contrasted to unpleasant) music showed activations of the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG, inferior Brodmann's area (BA) 44, BA 45, and BA 46), the anterior superior insula, the ventral striatum, Heschl's gyrus, and the Rolandic operculum. IFG activations appear to reflect processes of music–syntactic analysis and working memory operations. Activations of Rolandic opercular areas possibly reflect the activation of mirror‐function mechanisms during the perception of the pleasant tunes. Rolandic operculum, anterior superior insula, and ventral striatum may form a motor‐related circuitry that serves the formation of (premotor) representations for vocal sound production during the perception of pleasant auditory information. In all of the mentioned structures, except the hippocampus, activations increased over time during the presentation of the musical stimuli, indicating that the effects of emotion processing have temporal dynamics; the temporal dynamics of emotion have so far mainly been neglected in the functional imaging literature. Hum Brain Mapp 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.20180

Cites

98 of 98 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unpleasant dissonant music evokes response in amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and temporal poles.

    “Koelsch et al. (2006) reported that unpleasant (dissonant) music evoked response in amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and temporal poles.”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Koelsch et al. (2006)

  • Pleasant music evokes responses in inferior frontal gyrus and ventral striatum.

    “By contrast, pleasant music evoked responses in regions including inferior frontal gyrus and ventral striatum.”

    From Affective Cognition and its Disruption in Mood Disorders (2011) · cites this paper as Koelsch et al. (2006)

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., v. Cramon, D. Y., Müller, K., & Friederici, A. D.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-08-02
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
239-250
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W2133852590
Cited by
1,037
References
98
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 55 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 72 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 46
FWCI
11.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FOR499)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
music-evoked emotion, emotional valence, neural correlates of emotion, amygdala, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, temporal pole, inferior frontal gyrus, ventral striatum, rolandic operculum, Heschl's gyrus, working memory, mirror function, temporal dynamics of emotion
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adult, Auditory Perception, Basal Ganglia, Brain, Cerebral Cortex, Emotions, Female, Humans, Larynx, Functional Laterality, Limbic System, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Music, Nerve Net, Neural Pathways

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review