Cited by 376Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisNeuroscience and Music PerceptionEthics, Aesthetics, and Art

Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities

Open access
Brown, Steven, Gao, Xiaoqing, Tisdelle, Loren, Eickhoff, Simon B., Liotti, Mario·2011·NeuroImage

Abstract

We present here the most comprehensive analysis to date of neuroaesthetic processing by reporting the results of voxel-based meta-analyses of 93 neuroimaging studies of positive-valence aesthetic appraisal across four sensory modalities. The results demonstrate that the most concordant area of activation across all four modalities is the right anterior insula, an area typically associated with visceral perception, especially of negative valence (disgust, pain, etc.). We argue that aesthetic processing is, at its core, the appraisal of the valence of perceived objects. This appraisal is in no way limited to artworks but is instead applicable to all types of perceived objects. Therefore, one way to naturalize aesthetics is to argue that such a system evolved first for the appraisal of objects of survival advantage, such as food sources, and was later co-opted in humans for the experience of artworks for the satisfaction of social needs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brown et al. demonstrated that the processing of aesthetic stimuli, be they paintings, music or food, overlaps within the primary gustatory cortex.

    “Brown et al. [164] who demonstrated that the processing of aesthetic stimuli-be they paintings, music or food-overlap within the primary gustatory cortex.”

    From The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Sensory Factors in Sweetness Perception of Food and Beverages: A Review (2019) · cites this paper as [164]

    The Results report convergence in the right anterior insula across sensory modalities, and the Anterior insula section identifies this region with the primary gustatory cortex. But the paper does not establish consistent overlap for paintings specifically: its qualitative analysis found anterior-insula activation in only one of five visual-artwork studies, compared with four of six music studies. The claim overstates the finding for paintings. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Brown S, Dissanayake E, 2009. The arts are more than aesthetics: neuroaesthetics as narrow aesthetics. In: Skov M, Vartanian O (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics. Baywood, Amityville, NY, pp. 43– 57.
  2. Goldman A, 2001. The aesthetic. In: Gaut B, Lopes DM (Eds.), The Routeledge Companion to Aesthetics. Routledge, London, pp. 181 – 192.
  3. Guyer P, 2005. Values ofBeauty: Historical Essays in Aesthetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  4. Korsmeyer C, 2001. Taste. In: Gaut B, Lopes DM (Eds.), The Routeledge Companion to Aesthetics. Routledge, London, pp. 193– 202.
  5. Small DM, Zatorre RJ, Dagher A, Evans AC, Jones-Gotman M, 2001. Changes in brain activity related to eating chocolate. Brain 124, 1720– 1733. 11522575
  6. Vartanian O, 2009. Conscious experience of pleasure in art. In: Skov M, Vartanian O (Eds.), Neuroaesthetics. Baywood, Amityville, NY, pp. 261– 273.
  7. Voland E, Grammer K (Eds.), 2003. Evolutionary Aesthetics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, S., Gao, X., Tisdelle, L., Eickhoff, S. B., & Liotti, M.
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Corresponding author
Brown, Steven
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-09
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
250-258
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2140959160
Cited by
376
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 9
FWCI
8.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • GRAMMY Foundation
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (IRTG1328)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH074457)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
Keywords
neuroaesthetics, aesthetic appreciation, positive valence, sensory modalities, right anterior insula, visceral sensation, disgust, social function of art
MeSH terms
Art, Auditory Perception, Beauty, Brain, Brain Mapping, Esthetics, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neural Pathways, Sensation, Smell, Taste, Visual Perception, Likelihood Functions, Prefrontal Cortex, Positron-Emission Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review