Cited by 211Sex and Gender in HealthcarePediatric Pain Management TechniquesGender Roles and Identity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial Contributions to Sex-Correlated Differences in Pain

Myers, Cynthia D., Riley, Joseph L., Robinson, Michael E.·2003·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Sex-correlated differences in pain perception and behavior have been reported in several studies. Where such differences are found, they are most often in the direction of girls and women reporting more pain than is reported by boys and men. Although biologic, psychologic, and sociocultural factors act interdependently to influence pain responding, most efforts to explain sex-correlated differences in pain have focused on first-order biologic differences between the sexes. The current paper discusses empirical and theoretical literature addressing gender role socialization, cognitive factors, and affective factors associated with sex-correlated differences in pain. We affirm that there is convincing evidence that such psychosocial factors must be taken into account in research on sex-correlated differences in pain. We contend that the use of the dichotomous variable sex as a proxy for presumed biologic aspects of being female or male may obscure the contribution to sex-correlated differences that could be ascribed to the ways in which women and men are socialized with respect to pain perception and pain reporting.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00002508-200307000-00005

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 86 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Carter, 1984, 1983-, 2, 294
  2. Mechanic, 1964, Pediatrics, 33, 444
  3. Fillingim, 1996, J Gender Culture Health, 1, 21
  4. Sullivan, 1990, J Abn Psychol, 99, 260, 10.1037/0021-843X.99.3.260 · DOI
  5. Robin, 1987, Funct Neurol, 2, 173

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 211

Metadata

Authors
Myers, C. D., Riley, J. L., & Robinson, M. E.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Myers, Cynthia D.
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2003-07
Volume
19
Issue
4
Pages
225-232
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2331134117
Cited by
211
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r15mh057131-01a1)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R15MH57131)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 13208-01A2, DE007283)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
Keywords
sex differences in pain, pain perception, pain reporting, psychosocial factors, gender socialization, cognitive factors, emotional factors
MeSH terms
Cognition, Female, Humans, Male, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychology, Sex Factors, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review