The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration
Abstract
Skeletal regeneration is accomplished by a cascade of biologic processes that may include differentiation of pluripotential tissue, endochondral ossification, and bone remodeling. It has been shown that all these processes are influenced strongly by the local tissue mechanical loading history. This article reviews some of the mechanobiologic principles that are thought to guide the differentiation of mesenchymal tissue into bone, cartilage, or fibrous tissue during the initial phase of regeneration. Cyclic motion and the associated shear stresses cause cell proliferation and the production of a large callus in the early phases of fracture healing. For intermittently imposed loading in the regenerating tissue: (1) direct intramembranous bone formation is permitted in areas of low stress and strain; (2) low to moderate magnitudes of tensile strain and hydrostatic tensile stress may stimulate intramembranous ossification; (3) poor vascularity can promote chondrogenesis in an otherwise osteogenic environment; (4) hydrostatic compressive stress is a stimulus for chondrogenesis; (5) high tensile strain is a stimulus for the net production of fibrous tissue; and (6) tensile strain with a superimposed hydrostatic compressive stress will stimulate the development of fibrocartilage. Finite element models are used to show that the patterns of tissue differentiation observed in fracture healing and distraction osteogenesis can be predicted from these fundamental mechanobiologic concepts. In areas of cartilage formation, subsequent endochondral ossification normally will proceed, but it can be inhibited by intermittent hydrostatic compressive stress and accelerated by octahedral shear stress (or strain). Later, bone remodeling at these sites can be expected to follow the same mechanobiologic adaptation rules as normal bone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
TENSEGRITY: THE ARCHITECTURAL BASIS OF CELLULAR MECHANOTRANSDUCTION
Ingber, D. E. (1997) · Annual Review of Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.physiol.59.1.575 · Cited by 1,566
The influence of induced micromovement upon the healing of experimental tibial fractures
Goodship, A., & Kenwright, J. (1985) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.67b4.4030869 · Cited by 903
Physical and biological aspects of fracture healing with special reference to internal fixation.
Sm, P. (1979) · PubMed · Cited by 678
Biophysical stimuli on cells during tissue differentiation at implant interfaces
Prendergast, P. J., Huiskes, R., & Søballe, K. (1997) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00140-6 · Cited by 634
An approach for time‐dependent bone modeling and remodeling—theoretical development
Beaupré, G. S., Orr, T. E., & Carter, D. R. (1990) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100080506 · Cited by 565
Self-citationMechanical loading history and skeletal biology
Carter, D. R. (1987) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/0021-9290(87)90027-3 · Cited by 511
Self-citationCarter, D. R., Blenman, P. R., & Beaupré, G. S. (1988) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100060517 · Cited by 406
Self-citationFundamental and Clinical Bone Physiology.
(1981) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-95-2-248_2 · Cited by 355
The effects of hydrostatic pressure on matrix synthesis in articular cartilage
Hall, A. C., Urban, J. P. G., & Gehl, K. A. (1991) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100090102 · Cited by 330
Smith, R. L., Rusk, S. F., Ellison, B. E., Wessells, P., Tsuchiya, K., Carter, D. R., Caler, W. E., Sandell, L. J., & Schurman, D. J. (1996) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100140110 · Cited by 273
Self-citation
Cited by
Cellular biology of fracture healing
Bahney, C. S., Zondervan, R. L., Allison, P., Theologis, A., Ashley, J. W., Ahn, J., Miclau, T., Marcucio, R. S., & Hankenson, K. D. (2019) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.24170 · Cited by 577
Tenascins: regulation and putative functions during pathological stress
Chiquet‐Ehrismann, R., & Chiquet, M. (2003) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.1415 · Cited by 549
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, O. R. L., & Shapiro, F. (2008) · European Cells and Materials · doi:10.22203/ecm.v015a05 · Cited by 527
Modelling bone tissue fracture and healing: a review
Doblaré, M., Garcı́a, J. M., & Gómez, M. J. (2004) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2003.08.003 · Cited by 504
Mechanically induced osteogenic differentiation – the role of RhoA, ROCKII and cytoskeletal dynamics
Arnsdorf, E. J., Tummala, P., Kwon, R. Y., & Jacobs, C. R. (2009) · Journal of Cell Science · doi:10.1242/jcs.036293 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Carter, D. R., Beaupr??, G. S., Giori, N. J., & Helms, J. A.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 355S
- Issue
- 355 Suppl
- Pages
- S41-S55
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2065005994
- Cited by
- 758
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006
- The paper
- Carter, D. R., Beaupr??, G. S., Giori, N. J., & Helms, J. A. (1998). Mechanobiology of Skeletal Regeneration. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199810001-00006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.