Cited by 309Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSchizophrenia research and treatment

A Double-Blind Pilot Study of Risperidone in the Treatment of Conduct Disorder

FINDLING, ROBERT L., McNAMARA, NORA K., BRANICKY, LISA A., SCHLUCHTER, MARK D., LEMON, ELOISE, BLUMER, JEFFREY L.·2000·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine whether risperidone is superior to placebo in the treatment of youths with conduct disorder.Method This was a 10-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with 2 parallel arms. Ten youths were randomly assigned to receive placebo and 10 youths were randomly assigned to receive risperidone. Patients were seen weekly throughout the trial. Medications could be increased at weekly intervals during the first 6 weeks of the study from an initial dose of 0.25 mg or 0.50 mg each morning, depending on patient weight. Patients weighing less than 50 kg had a maximum total daily dose of risperidone of 1.5 mg. Patients weighing 50 kg or greater had a maximum total daily dose of risperidone of 3.0 mg. The primary outcome measure was the Rating of Aggression Against People and/or Property Scale.Results Risperidone was superior to placebo in ameliorating aggression on most measures. Risperidone was reasonably well tolerated, with none of the risperidone-treated patients developing extrapyramidal side effects.Conclusions These data provide preliminary evidence that risperidone may have efficacy in the treatment of youths with conduct disorder. Because of the small sample size and the brief length of this study, further research is necessary to confirm these findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-200004000-00021

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
FINDLING, R. L., McNAMARA, N. K., BRANICKY, L. A., SCHLUCHTER, M. D., LEMON, E., & BLUMER, J. L.
Affiliations
University Hospitals of Cleveland (US)
Corresponding author
FINDLING, ROBERT L.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-04
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
509-516
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076287319
Cited by
309
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
26.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
NICHD Pediatric Pharmacology Research Unit (HD 31323-05)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
risperidone, conduct disorder, youth, aggression, antipsychotic drugs, placebo comparison, drug tolerability, extrapyramidal symptoms
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aggression, Child, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Risperidone, Conduct Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review