Cited by 108Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Primary Motor Cortex Involvement in Alzheimer Disease

Suvà, Domizio, Favre, Isabelle, Kraftsik, Rudolf, Esteban, Monica, Lobrinus, Alexander, Miklossy, Jodith·1999·Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology

Abstract

In Alzheimer disease (AD) the involvement of entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, and associative cortical areas is well established. Regarding the involvement of the primary motor cortex the reported data are contradictory. In order to determine whether the primary motor cortex is involved in AD, the brains of 29 autopsy cases were studied, including, 17 cases with severe cortical AD-type changes with definite diagnoses of AD, 7 age-matched cases with discrete to moderate cortical AD-type changes, and 5 control cases without any AD-type cortical changes. Morphometric analysis of the cortical surface occupied by senile plaques (SPs) on beta-amyloid-immunostained sections and quantitative analysis of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) on Gallyas-stained sections was performed in 5 different cortical areas including the primary motor cortex. The percentage of cortical surface occupied by SPs was similar in all cortical areas, without significant difference and corresponded to 16.7% in entorhinal cortex, 21.3% in frontal associative, 16% in parietal associative, and 15.8% in primary motor cortex. The number of NFTs in the entorhinal cortex was significantly higher (41 per 0.4 mm2), compared with those in other cortical areas (20.5 in frontal, 17.9 in parietal and 11.5 in the primary motor cortex). Our findings indicate that the primary motor cortex is significantly involved in AD and suggest the appearance of motor dysfunction in late and terminal stages of the disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005072-199911000-00002

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Suvà, D., Favre, I., Kraftsik, R., Esteban, M., Lobrinus, A., & Miklossy, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
  • University of Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Suvà, Domizio
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology
Published
1999-11
Volume
58
Issue
11
Pages
1125-1134
ISSN
0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025311531
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, primary motor cortex, amyloid plaques, neurofibrillary tangles, entorhinal cortex, cortical involvement, motor impairment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Brain Chemistry, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Parietal Lobe, Somatosensory Cortex, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofibrillary Tangles, Entorhinal Cortex, Plaque, Amyloid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review