Cited by 98Workplace Violence and BullyingNursing education and managementHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

The Effect of Authentic Leadership, Person-Job Fit, and Civility Norms on New Graduate Nurses’ Experiences of Coworker Incivility and Burnout

Laschinger, Heather K. Spence, Read, Emily A.·2016·JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study examined the influence of authentic leadership, person-job fit with 6 areas of worklife, and civility norms on coworker incivility and burnout among new graduate nurses. BACKGROUND: New graduate nurses report experiencing high levels of workplace incivility from coworkers, which has been found to negatively impact their job and career satisfaction and increase their intention to leave. The role of civility norms in preventing burnout and subsequent exposure to incivility from coworkers has yet to be examined among new graduate nurses. METHODS: A cross-sectional mail survey of 993 new graduate nurses across Canada was conducted. RESULTS: The results supported the hypothesized relationships between study variables. CONCLUSIONS: Civility norms play a key role in preventing early career burnout and coworker incivility experienced by new graduate nurses. Leaders can influence civility norms by engaging in authentic leadership behaviors and optimizing person-job fit.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nna.0000000000000407

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authentic leadership impacts Emotional Exhaustion only through civility norms and co-worker incivility.

    “a similar pathway was identified by Laschiner and Read, although authentic leadership impacted Emotional Exhaustion only and it was also through civility norms and co-worker incivility [31]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

  • Co-worker incivility predicts Emotional Exhaustion.

    “co-worker incivility predicted Emotional Exhaustion [31]”

    From Burnout in nursing: a theoretical review. (2020) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Laschinger, H. K. S., & Read, E. A.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Laschinger, Heather K. Spence
Venue
JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration
Published
2016-11
Volume
46
Issue
11
Pages
574-580
ISSN
  • 0002-0443 (ISSN-L)
  • 1539-0721
OpenAlex
W2544651592
Cited by
98
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 5
FWCI
20.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
authentic leadership, person-job fit, coworker incivility, burnout, new nurses, early career nurses, workplace incivility, nursing leadership
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Burnout, Professional, Canada, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Job Satisfaction, Leadership, Nursing Staff, Hospital

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review