Cited by 96Probiotics and Fermented FoodsEscherichia coli research studiesInfant Nutrition and Health

Lactobacillus plantarum Reduces the In Vitro Secretory Response of Intestinal Epithelial Cells to Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli Infection

Michail, Sonia, Abernathy, Frank·2002·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Enteropathogenic (EPEC) is a Gram-negative bacillus that causes diarrhea. Secretory responses of intestinal epithelial cells can be seen after EPEC infection. Probiotics, which are live bacteria that have proven benefit to the host, play a role in the treatment and prevention of the different enteric pathogens. The goals of the study were to determine whether the probiotic agent (LBP) strain 299v alters the secretory changes seen in EPEC infection and, if so, what underlying mechanism is possible. METHODS: Caco-2 cell monolayers were rapidly infected with EPEC strain E2348/69 and immediately mounted in Ussing chambers. The monolayers were exposed to LBP before, after, and simultaneously with EPEC infection. Short circuit current (Isc) was measured in the Ussing chamber. RESULTS: EPEC infection caused an increase in short circuit current that was reduced by preincubation with LBP ( < 0.01). No direct bactericidal effect was observed, but LBP reduced the attachment of EPEC to Caco-2 cells. CONCLUSION: LBP can play an important role in reducing the secretory change in response to EPEC infection, possibly through inhibition of its binding. However, the presence of the probiotic agent before the infection is necessary. In this setting, its role is more preventive rather than therapeutic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005176-200209000-00021

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michail, S., & Abernathy, F.
Affiliations
Wright State University (US)
Corresponding author
Michail, Sonia
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
350-355
ISSN
0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993569919
Cited by
96
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, probiotics, intestinal epithelial cells, Caco-2 cells, short-circuit current, intestinal secretion, bacterial adhesion, diarrhea prevention
MeSH terms
Bacterial Adhesion, Diarrhea, Escherichia coli Infections, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Lactobacillus, Time Factors, Electric Impedance, Ion Transport, Caco-2 Cells, Probiotics, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review