Cited by 129Diabetes Management and EducationMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Research

Brief, Computer-Assisted Diabetes Dietary Self-Management Counseling: Effects on Behavior, Physiologic Outcomes, and Quality of Life

Glasgow, Russell E., Toobert, Deborah J.·2000·Medical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this work was to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, and implementation of a brief behavioral dietary intervention and 2 supplemental components of diabetes self-management support: telephone follow-up calls and community resources enhancement. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS: This was a 2 x 2 randomized, controlled trial investigating the incremental effects of telephone follow-up and community resources enhancement with 320 adult type 2 diabetes outpatients. METHODS. Key outcomes included behavioral (dietary patterns, fat intake), physiologic (HbA1c, lipids), and quality-of-life/patient satisfaction measures and were collected at baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Despite high reach (76% patient participation), excellent adoption (all 12 primary care practices approached participated), and good implementation, there were few outcome differences among treatment conditions. There was significant improvement across conditions in most outcomes in each category at both follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: A brief, computer-assisted, dietary goal-setting intervention basic treatment condition was moderately successful in producing dietary improvements but less so in producing biologic or quality-of-life outcomes. Additions of follow-up phone calls or a community resources enhancement component did not produce incremental improvements over this basic intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-200011000-00002

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glasgow, R. E., & Toobert, D. J.
Affiliations
Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Glasgow, Russell E.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2000-11
Volume
38
Issue
11
Pages
1062-1073
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2049252977
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK035524, R01 DK 35524-13)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, diabetes self-management, nutrition counseling, computer-based intervention, telephone follow-up, community resources, HbA1c, serum lipids, quality of life, patient satisfaction, primary care
MeSH terms
Community-Institutional Relations, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Quality of Life, Self Care, Program Evaluation, Health Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review