Cited by 96Obesity, Physical Activity, DietMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsObesity and Health Practices

Computerized Weight Loss Intervention Optimizes Staff Time

WYLIE-ROSETT, JUDITH, SWENCIONIS, CHARLES, GINSBERG, MINDY, CIMINO, CHRISTOPHER, WASSERTHEIL-SMOLLER, SYLVIA, CABAN, ARLENE, SEGAL-ISAACSON, CJ, MARTIN, TAMARA +1 more·2001·Journal of the American Dietetic Association

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the costs and effects of incremental components of a weight-loss program.Design A 3-arm, 12-month randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate 3 incremental levels of intervention intensity.Subjects/setting The study included 588 individuals (BMI > 25 kg/m2) in a freestanding health maintenance organizalion and achieved an 81% completion rate.Intervention Using a cognitive behavioral approach for tailoring lifestyle modification goals, the incremental levels of intervention included a) a workbook alone, b) the addition of computerized tailoring using onsite computer kiosks with touch screen monitors, and c) the addition of both computers and staff consultation.Main outcome measures Endpoints included weight parameters, lipid profile, plasma glucose, blood pressure, intervention costs, dietary intake, and physical activity.Statistical analysis performed Study endpoints were analyzed using analysis of variance for normally distributed variables and analysis of covariance to control for any baseline differences. Regression and correlation analysis assessed the relationship between weight loss and other variables.Results For the increasing levels of intervention intensity, the mean 12-month weight losses were 2.2, 4.7, and 7.4 pounds, with the respective cost per participant being $12.33, $41.99, and $133.74. The decreases in mean BMIs for these respective intervelation levels were 0.4, 0.9 and 1.2. All groups reported a decrease in energy and fat intake and an increase in blocks walked (P<.01). Intervention variables that correlated with weight loss included more computer log-ons, achieving computer-selected goals, more self-monitoring, increased walking, and decreased energy and fat intake, as well as higher attendance in staff consultation group sessions for that treatment condition. Weight loss correlated with decreases in fasting glucose and blood pressure.Applications/conclusions In a weight-loss program, computers can facilitate selecting behavioral change goals. More frequent usage resulted in greater weight loss. Staff counseling to augment the computer intervention achieved the most weight loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0002-8223(01)00284-x

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two of the studies comparing an interactive computer-based intervention with a minimal or no treatment control condition were three-arm trials, and both reported no significant difference between the two computer intervention arms.

    “Two of the studies comparing an interactive computer-based intervention with a minimal or no treatment control condition (Schroder 2010; Wylie-Rosett 2001) were three-arm trials, in which a third treatment arm supplemented the computer-based intervention with an in-person treatment component. Both studies reported that there was not a significant difference between the two computer intervention ar”
  • Wylie-Rosett 2001 reported that the study completers did not differ significantly from the dropouts with respect to baseline characteristics, but did not otherwise state how missing data were handled.

    “Wylie-Rosett 2001 reported that the study completers did not differ significantly from the dropouts with respect to baseline characteristics, but did not otherwise state how missing data were handled.”
  • In Wylie-Rosett 2001, at 12 months, the decrease in percent calories from fat was not significantly different between intervention arms when all computer intervention participants were included (MD 0.6%, 95% CI −1.0 to 2.3; P = 0.45; 474 participants).

    “In a second study (Wylie-Rosett 2001), the decrease in percent calories from fat at 12 months was not significantly different between intervention arms, whether all computer intervention participants were included in the analysis (MD 0.6% (95% CI −1.0 to 2.3); P = 0.45; 474 participants; Analysis 1.16; primary analysis 1.16.1)”
  • In Wylie-Rosett 2001, participants in the control arm decreased their caloric intake slightly more than participants in the computer intervention arm at 12 months follow-up, although the difference was small and not significant at P < 0.05 for the analysis including all participants (MD 94 kcal/day, 95% CI -29 to 217, P = 0.14; 474 participants) or for the analysis excluding intervention particip

    “In a third study (Wylie-Rosett 2001), which followed participants to 12 months, participants in the control arm decreased their caloric intake slightly more than participants in the computer intervention arm at 12 months follow-up, although the difference was small and not significant at P < 0.05 for the analysis including all participants (MD 94 kcal/day (95% CI −29 to 217); P = 0.14; 474”
  • In the single study reporting percent weight loss at 12 months (Wylie-Rosett 2001), participants in the computer intervention lost a greater percentage of body weight than participants in the control group (MD -2.0%, 95% CI -3.1 to -0.8, P = 0.0008; 474 participants), although this effect was smaller and no longer statistically significant when participants receiving additional in-person cons

    “In the single study reporting percent weight loss at 12 months (Wylie-Rosett 2001), participants in the computer intervention lost a greater percentage of body weight than participants in the control group (MD −2.0% (95% CI −3.1 to −0.8); P = 0.0008; 474 participants; Analysis 1.5; primary analysis 1.5.1), although this effect was smaller and no longer statistically significant when participants”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WYLIE-ROSETT, J., SWENCIONIS, C., GINSBERG, M., CIMINO, C., WASSERTHEIL-SMOLLER, S., CABAN, A., SEGAL-ISAACSON, C., MARTIN, T., & LEWIS, J.
Affiliations
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US)
  • University of New Hampshire (US)
Venue
Journal of the American Dietetic Association
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-10
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
1155-1162
ISSN
0002-8223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W167057333
Cited by
96
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Dietetic Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl050372-05)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL50372)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01 DK20451)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
weight loss interventions, computer-based intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, lifestyle modification, intervention intensity, cost-effectiveness, employee consultation, self-monitoring, dietary intake, physical activity, obesity, health maintenance organizations, goal setting
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Energy Intake, Cardiovascular Diseases, Computer-Assisted Instruction, Costs and Cost Analysis, Dietary Services, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Managed Care Programs, Middle Aged, Obesity, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Exercise, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Body Mass Index, Nutritional Sciences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review