Cited by 504Behavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

Identifying active ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review

Open access
Dombrowski, Stephan U., Sniehotta, Falko F., Avenell, Alison, Johnston, Marie, MacLennan, Graeme, Araújo-Soares, Vera·2012·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Reducing obesity is an important preventive strategy for people who are at increased risk of major disabling or life-threatening conditions. Behavioural treatments for obesity are complex and involve several components aiming to facilitate behaviour change. Systematic reviews need to assess the components that moderate intervention effects. Electronic databases and journals were searched for randomised controlled trials of behavioural interventions targeting dietary and/or physical activity change for obese adults (mean BMI≥30, mean age≥40 years) with risk factors and follow-up data≥12 weeks. A reliable taxonomy of theory-congruent behaviour change techniques (BCTs; Abraham & Michie, 2008) was used to identify programme components. Meta-regression suggested that increasing numbers of identified BCTs are not necessarily associated with better outcomes. The BCTs provision of instructions (β =− 2.69, p=0.02), self-monitoring (β = − 3.37, p<0.001), relapse prevention (β = − 2.63, p=0.02) and prompting practice (β = − 3.63, p<0.001) could be linked to more successful interventions. Studies including more BCTs aimed at dietary change that are congruent with Control Theory were associated with greater weight loss (β = − 1.13, p=0.04). Post-hoc ratings of intervention components in published trials can lead to the identification of components and theories for behaviour change practice and research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2010.513298

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Haslam, D. W., & James, W. P. T. (2005). Obesity. Lancet, 366(9492), 1197-1209.
  2. Higgins, J. P. T., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 (4th ed.). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  3. Johnston, M. (1995). Health related behaviour change. In I. Sharpe (Ed.), Cardiovascular prevention in primary care: The way forward. national forum for coronary disease prevention (pp. 37-47). London: Kings Fund.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dombrowski, S. U., Sniehotta, F. F., Avenell, A., Johnston, M., MacLennan, G., & Araújo-Soares, V.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Newcastle University
Corresponding author
Dombrowski, Stephan U.
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2010-12-13
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
7-32
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W2171316716
Cited by
504
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 15
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/G007470/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
obesity, behavioral interventions, behaviour change techniques, active ingredients, obesity-related comorbidities, weight loss, dietary change, physical activity, self-monitoring, relapse prevention, control theory, intervention moderators

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review