Cited by 2Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

Validation and Refinement of the Short Version of Perinatal Grief Scale in Chinese Women Who Experience Perianal Loss: A Psychometric Study.

Open access
Li, Si Ni, Yang, Li, Wang, Qing Yu, Xie, Jiao, Cao, Hui, Zhao, Wen, Tang, Su Qin·2025·Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Abstract

Background: The Short Version of the Perinatal Grief Scale (SVPGS) is a widely used scale of grief related to perinatal loss. This study aims to validate and refine the SVPGS among Chinese women experiencing perinatal loss by addressing its psychometric properties. Methods: After translating the SVPGS from English to Chinese and conducting a pre‐test with 20 end‐users, followed by an assessment of content validity involving 10 experts, a cross‐sectional study was conducted to assess its internal reliability and structure, concurrent, convergent, divergent, known‐group validities among 353 women who have experienced perinatal loss across eight hospitals in Hunan Province, China. A subset of 275 participants were reassessed over a 1‐month interval for the test–retest reliability. Results: The refined 15‐item SVPGS demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92) and strong 1‐month test–retest reliability (κ = 0.83) compared to the original SVPGS. A three‐factor structure consisting of 15 items was confirmed through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and parallel analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis further validated this structure, indicating a good fit for the refined SVPGS. Concurrent validity was supported by a large correlation between the SVPGS and refined SVPGS (r = 0.90, p < 0.01). Convergent and divergent validities were confirmed through significant correlations with variables including depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and post‐traumatic stress disorder, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self‐compassion, perceived social support, and quality of life. Known‐group validation revealed significant differences in these variables between high and low levels of the refined SVPGS. Conclusions: These findings indicate that the refined SVPGS is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for measuring grief in women who have experienced perinatal loss. Future research is strongly recommended to test the refined SVPGS across diverse samples and cultural contexts to enhance its generalizability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cpp.70067

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 23 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Study design and conductcitation

    A minimum of 330 participants was required for the study.

    “A minimum of 330 participants was required for inclusion in this study.”
    • Also stated in: § 2.2 | Participants and Sample Size Estimation · plain
      “Given that the Perinatal Grief Scale comprises 33 items, this necessitates a minimum of 330 respondents.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Kyriazos 2018 source

      Section 4.1 (page unavailable) discusses minimum sample-size rules of thumb, including a suggested sample of 300, but does not specify 330. The paper provides general guidance for factor analysis and SEM, not an inclusion requirement for the citing study. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Pett et al. 2003 source
  • Premisecitation

    This finding is consistent with the original SVPGS developed by Potvin et al. (1989) and other psychometric evaluations in different countries and regions, such as Greek, Persian, and Hong Kong.

    “This finding is consistent with the original SVPGS developed by Potvin et al. (1989) and other psychometric evaluation in different countries and regions, such as Greek (Maniatelli et al. 2018), Persia (Khoori et al. 2024), and Hong Kong (Yan et al. 2010).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Potvin et al. (1989) source
    • cites Maniatelli et al. 2018

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Khoori et al. 2024 source

      The Dear Editor section identifies the authors as creators of a Persian Perinatal Grief Scale and says it underwent translation and validation. But this 2024 paper is a letter about how a modification affects scoring, not the original Persian psychometric evaluation; its References identify that evaluation as a 2018 study. The unspecified finding said to be ‘consistent’ cannot be checked against this source. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    No sociodemographic variables were significantly correlated with refined SVPGS scores.

    “No sociodemographic variables were identified as having a significant correlation with the refined SVPGS scores.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The refined SVPGS has a test-retest reliability kappa of 0.83 over an 8-week interval.

    “strong 1-month test-retest reliability (κ = 0.83)”
    • Also stated in: § 3.2 | Internal Consistency and Stability of the 6-PAQ-C · plain
      “the kappa value of the eight-week test-retest reliability of the refined SVPGS was 0.83 (range 0.80 [domain: difficulty coping] to 0.88 [domain: active grief]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The refined SVPGS and original SVPGS subscales are positively correlated (r = 0.73 to 0.77, p < 0.01).

    “as well as among their subscales (r ranged from 0.73 to 0.77, all p < 0.01; Table A2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 18
  • May combine two claims. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The WHOQOL-BREF has overall Cronbach's alpha 0.731 and subscale alphas 0.71-0.79.

    “The overall Cronbach's alpha for the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire was 0.731, while the Cronbach's alpha for the subscales ranged from 0.71 to 0.79 (Zhang et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al. 2012 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The overall Cronbach's α of the original SVPGS was 0.69, indicating unacceptable internal consistency.

    “The overall Cronbach's α of the SVPGS was 0.69, indicating an unacceptable level of internal consistency; therefore, further improvements were necessary.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Convergent and divergent validities were confirmed through significant correlations with depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, PTSD, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, perceived social support, and quality of life.

    “The SVPGS showed strong correlations with other mental health measures, including depressive symptoms, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, perceived social support, and quality of life.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The Chinese versions of the comparator instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, IES-R, Psy-Flex, MAAS, SCS-SF, MSPSS, WHOQOL-BREF) are valid for measuring their respective constructs in women who have experienced perinatal loss.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    The refined SVPGS has a three-factor structure (active grief, difficulty coping, despair) consisting of 15 items.

    “A three-factor structure consisting of 15 items was confirmed through item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and parallel analysis.”
    • Also stated in: § 3.3 | Structure Validity · plain
      “A CFA was conducted for the refined SVPGS to validate the three-factor structure”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    18 items were removed from the original SVPGS based on CITC results, resulting in a 15-item refined SVPGS.

    “Consequently, based on the CITC results, 18 items were removed based on the selection criteria, resulting in a final version of the 15-item SVPGS (Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The refined SVPGS subscales have Cronbach's α values of 0.87 (active grief), 0.87 (difficulty coping), and 0.89 (despair).

    “The Cronbach's α for the refined SVPGS and its subscales-active grief, difficulty coping, and despair-were 0.92, 0.87, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The three-factor model was confirmed by CFA, demonstrating an excellent overall fit compared to the one-factor and two-factor models.

    “Moreover, the three-factor model was confirmed by CFA, demonstrating an excellent overall fit compared to the onefactor and two-factor models.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of the GAD-7 has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) in outpatient populations.

    “The Chinese version of the GAD-7 was validated in outpatient populations from traditional Chinese internal medicine departments, indicating excellent internal consistency reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 (Zeng et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zeng et al. 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of the PHQ-9 has good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.86) in a community adult population.

    “The Chinese version of the PHQ-9 has been validated in a community adult population, demonstrating good internal consistency reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.86 (Wang et al. 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang et al. 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    A total of 353 women participated, and 275 (77.90%) completed the 1-month reassessment.

    “A total of 353 women who experienced perinatal loss participated in this survey and 275 responder (77.90%) completed the reassessment after 1-month interval.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The refined SVPGS is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for measuring grief in women who have experienced perinatal loss.

    “These findings indicate that the refined SVPGS is a brief, reliable, and valid tool for measuring grief in women who have experienced perinatal loss.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The convenience sample from eight hospitals in Hunan Province is representative of women who have experienced perinatal loss in mainland China.
    • Rests on an assumption: The Chinese versions of the comparator instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, IES-R, Psy-Flex, MAAS, SCS-SF, MSPSS, WHOQOL-BREF) are valid for measuring their respective constructs in women who have experienced perinatal loss.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of MSPSS has satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89).

    “The Chinese version of the MSPSS has been validated in 12th-grade high school students, demonstrating satisfactory internal consistency with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.89 for the total score (Chou 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chou 2000 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of the IES-R has acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.83-0.89) and test-retest stability (r = 0.52-0.76).

    “The Chinese version of the IES-R (CIES-R) has been validated in patients from the Accident and Emergency Department, demonstrating acceptable internal consistency (with α values ranging from 0.83 to 0.89 for the three subscales) and test-retest stability (with r values ranging from 0.52 to 0.76) (Wu and Chan 2003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wu and Chan 2003 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Turkish version, validated among 185 women, found the 32-item SVPGS had satisfactory internal reliability (α = 0.96) and 2-week test-retest reliability (0.91).

    “In addition, the Tukey version, validated among 185 women who were living with perinatal loss up to 12 weeks past their loss, found that the 32-item SVPGS had satisfactory internal reliability (α = 0.96) and demonstrated 2-week test-retest reliability (0.91) (Kones et al. 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kones et al. 2017

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Yan et al. (2010) found that CFA rejected the original three-factor model and EFA suggested an alternative three-factor model for the Chinese SVPGS.

    “The authors noted that CFA rejected the original three-factor model, while EFA suggested an alternative three-factor model comprising a 12-item Sense of Worthlessness subscale, a 7-item Social Detachment subscale, and a 7-item Painful Recollection subscale.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yan et al. 2010 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of SCS-SF has good internal consistency (0.77 to 0.80).

    “The Chinese version of SCS-SF has been validated in Chinese college students with a good internal consistency of 0.77 to 0.80 (Huang et al. 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Huang et al. 2023

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Lai et al. (2013) identified and confirmed a two-factor structure for the Chinese SVPGS with good model fit.

    “In contract, utilizing both EFA and CFA, Lai et al. (2013) identified and confirmed a two-factor structure for the Chinese SVPGS, reporting a good model fit (χ 2 [350] = 787.1,p < 0.01; root mean square error of approximation = 0.058; normed fit index = 0.90; goodness-of-fit index = 0.91; comparative fit index = 0.92).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lai et al. 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The SVPGS has been translated into 17 languages and validated globally.

    “The SVPGS has been widely used, translated into 17 languages, and validated globally for various types of loss related to pregnancy (Wright and Carpenter 2023).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wright and Carpenter 2023 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of Psy-Flex has acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.84) and strong 2-week test-retest reliability (weighted kappa = 0.88).

    “The Chinese version of Psy-Flex (Psy-Flex-C) demonstrated acceptable internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of 0.84, and exhibited strong stability, reflected by a 2-week testretest reliability with a weighted kappa statistic of 0.88 (Li, Chien, et al. 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Li, Chien, et al. 2024

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Spanish version of the SVPGS, validated by González et al. (2011) in 200 women, showed a refined 27-item version had satisfactory internal reliability (α = 0.95).

    “For example, the Spanish version of the SVPGS, validated by González et al. (2011) in a sample of 200 women who had experienced one or more perinatal losses, showed that a refined 27-item version had satisfactory internal reliability (α = 0.95).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites González et al. (2011)

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The refined SVPGS exhibited good known-group validity, showing that parents with high and low levels of perinatal grief demonstrate significant differences in depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, PTSD, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, and perceived social support.

    “Furthermore, the refined SVPGS exhibited good known-group validity, showing that parents with high and low levels of perinatal grief demonstrate significant differences in depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, PTSD, psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, and perceived social support.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Chinese version of MAAS has good internal consistency (α = 0.89).

    “The Chinese version of the MAAS was validated in Chinese college students and reported a good internal consistency reliability (α = 0.89) (Chen et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al. 2012

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Convenience sampling with self-selected volunteers may have compromised the representativeness of the sample and limited the ability to assess potential demographic or clinical differences between respondents and non-respondents.

    “First, to enhance practicality and efficiency, this study employed convenience sampling, with participants being self-selected volunteers.This approach may have compromised the representativeness of the sample and limited the ability to assess potential demographic or clinical differences between respondents and non-respondents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationown data

    This finding increases confidence in applying the three-factor model.

    “This finding increases confidence in applying the three-factor model, which not only enhances our understanding of perinatal grief but also provides a robust framework for future research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Focusing exclusively on Chinese women who experienced perinatal loss, excluding partners and other population samples, raises questions regarding the validity of the revised SVPGS in accurately measuring paternal grief and may introduce selection bias, affecting the generalizability of the results.

    “Second, this study focused exclusively on Chinese women who experienced perinatal loss, excluding their partners and other population samples.This omission raises questions regarding the validity of the revised SVPGS in accurately measuring paternal grief and may introduce selection bias, affecting the generalizability of the results.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Higher levels of grief related to perinatal loss are associated with increased depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and PTSD.

    “Furthermore, a positive correlation was identified between the refined SVPGS and the PHQ-9, GAD-7, and IES-R, indicating that higher levels of grief related to perinatal loss are associated with increased depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and PTSD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The refined SVPGS presents a reliable, valid, and time-saving tool for assessing perinatal grief in Chinese women, addressing a critical gap in psychological research and practice within this demographic.

    “In conclusion, the refined SVPGS presents a reliable, valid, and time-saving tool for assessing perinatal grief in Chinese women, addressing a critical gap in psychological research and practice within this demographic.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The refined 15-item SVPGS is more effective in gathering data from this vulnerable population, enabling participants to complete the questionnaire with less strain and in a more timely manner.
    • Rests on an assumption: There is a critical gap in psychological research and practice for assessing perinatal grief in Chinese women.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Higher levels of grief are linked to lower levels of psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, perceived social support, and overall quality of life.

    “In addition, a negative correlation was found between the refined SVPGS and the Psy-Flex-C, MAAS, SCS-SF, MSPSS, and WHOQOL-BREF, suggesting that higher levels of grief are linked to lower levels of psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, perceived social support, and overall quality of life.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Reliance on self-reported data may introduce biases, such as social desirability bias or inaccurate recall.

    “Finally, the reliance on self-reported data may introduce biases, such as social desirability bias or inaccurate recall.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
29 of 29
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No research has been conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the SVPGS in women who have experienced perinatal loss in mainland China.

    “no research has been conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the SVPGS in women who have experienced perinatal loss in mainland China, where varying policies and cultural contexts may significantly affect both the experience and expression of perinatal grief.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The convenience sample from eight hospitals in Hunan Province is representative of women who have experienced perinatal loss in mainland China.

    “A convenience sample was recruited from eight hospitals across seven cities in Hunan Province, China.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The Chinese versions of the comparator instruments (PHQ-9, GAD-7, IES-R, Psy-Flex, MAAS, SCS-SF, MSPSS, WHOQOL-BREF) are valid for measuring their respective constructs in women who have experienced perinatal loss.

    “The convergent validity of the refined SVPGS was assessed by calculating the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between the refined SVPGS and tools measuring similar constructs (i.e.PHQ-9, GAD-7, and IES-R).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    In the context of perinatal grief, individuals may experience prolonged grief disorder, particularly if societal support is lacking or if cultural norms discourage emotional expression.

    “In the context of perinatal grief, individuals may experience prolonged grief disorder, particularly if societal support is lacking or if cultural norms discourage emotional expression.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The refined 15-item SVPGS is more effective in gathering data from this vulnerable population, enabling participants to complete the questionnaire with less strain and in a more timely manner.

    “The refined version proved to be more effective in gathering data from this vulnerable population, as it addressed both the physical and psychological challenges they face, enabling participants to complete the questionnaire with less strain and in a more timely manner.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is a critical gap in psychological research and practice for assessing perinatal grief in Chinese women.

    “addressing a critical gap in psychological research and practice within this demographic.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The low-grief group's mean exceeds its inclusion cutoff

    Major

    A group restricted to refined SVPGS scores of 30 or less cannot have a mean score of 31.16.

  • The two-factor fit summary disagrees with Table 3

    Major

    The prose puts all two-factor models' χ2/df values between 5.82 and 6.75 and their GFI values between 0.76 and 0.80. Table 3 instead reports χ2/df of 4.75 and GFI of 0.89 for model 3, among other out-of-range indices.

  • Most reported losses fall outside the paper's perinatal-loss definition

    Major

    The paper defines perinatal loss as beginning at gestational week 20, but reports that 183 participants' most recent losses occurred during weeks 1-12.

  • Significant demographic associations are both denied and reported

    Major

    The results say no sociodemographic variables were significantly correlated with refined SVPGS scores, but the Table 1 note says three were.

  • The retest interval is reported as both one month and eight weeks

    Major

    The results describe the reassessment as occurring after one month, whereas the procedure and reliability result specify eight weeks.

  • The percentage for losses at weeks 1-12 uses the wrong denominator

    Major

    The reported 183 participants are 51.84% of the sample of 353, not 65.13%. This affects the stated distribution of gestational ages.

    Reported 65.13 · recomputed 51.84136

  • Two known-group t-statistic signs disagree with the table

    Minor

    The results give positive t-statistics for anxiety and PTSD, while Table A3 gives negative statistics of the same magnitudes.

  • The quality-of-life response scale has conflicting category counts

    Minor

    The WHOQOL-BREF description calls its response scale five-point but states endpoints of 1 and 7. Its stated maximum total of 182 also corresponds to 26 items scored up to 7.

  • Social support and quality-of-life measures are mislabeled

    Minor

    The correlation results call MSPSS a quality-of-life measure and WHOQOL-BREF a perceived-social-support measure, reversing the constructs assigned to those instruments in the measures section.

  • The reported Psy-Flex mean is below its possible range

    Minor

    The results give a Psy-Flex-C mean of 3.42, although the measure's stated total-score range starts at 6. Table 4 separately gives its mean as 21.70.

10 of 10

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Borg S., 1982, When Pregnancy Fails: Coping With Miscarriage, Stillbirth, and Infant Death
  2. González C. M., 2011, Escala de duelo perinatal: Validación en mujeres mexicanas con pérdida gestacional. [Perinatal Grief Scale: Mexican Women With Gestational Loss.], Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 43, 419
  3. Huang L. Y., 2023, Longitudinal Measurement Invariance, Validity, and Reliability Analysis of the Self‐Compassion Scale‐Short Form Among Chinese College Students, Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 107, 111
  4. Kline P., 2000, A Psychometrics Primer
  5. Kones M. O., 2017, The Perinatal Grief Scale (33‐Item Short Version): Validity and Reliability of the Turkish/Perinatal Yas Olcegi (33 Maddeli Kisa Surum): Turkce Gecerlilik ve Guvenilirlik Calismasi, Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 18, 231+
  6. Tarmey L. A., 2024, Part A: Coping Styles and Mental Health Outcomes in Partners Who Have Experienced a Perinatal Loss: A Longitudinal Study; Part B: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Grief Related Difficulties Following Perinatal Loss: A Conceptual Review

Authors
Li, S. N., Yang, L., Wang, Q. Y., Xie, J., Cao, H., Zhao, W., & Tang, S. Q.
Affiliations
  • School of Psychology Shenzhen University Shenzhen People's Republic of China
  • Central South University (CN)
  • Clinical Nursing Teaching and Research Section, The Second Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha China
  • Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Second Xiangya Hospital Central South University Changsha Hunan China
Corresponding author
Yang, Li
Venue
Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-03
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
e70067-e70067
ISSN
  • 1063-3995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0879
OpenAlex
W4408997650
Cited by
2
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Keywords
Perinatal Grief Scale, perinatal loss, grief measurement, Chinese women, scale validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
East Asian People, Adult, China, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-11.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-11.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review