Cited by 118Mental Health Treatment and AccessGender Roles and Identity StudiesSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Stigma towards depression in a community-based sample in China

Open access
Yang, Fang, Yang, Bing Xiang, Stone, Teresa E., Wang, Xiao Qin, Zhou, Yang, Zhang, Juan, Jiao, Shu Fen·2020·Comprehensive Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Understanding the general public's beliefs about depression is essential if public education and anti-stigma interventions are to be effective. This study aimed to examine Chinese respondents' personal attitudes towards depression and their perceptions about the attitudes of others regarding depression and to identify the correlates of personal stigma and perceived stigma towards depression. METHODS: A community survey was conducted among 1697 residents aged between 16 and 89 years of a large city in central China using the Depression Stigma Scale. Participants completed questionnaires assessing experiences of depression and family functioning. RESULTS: Participants reported high levels of stigma towards depression, with greater perceived stigma than personal stigma. Increasing age was correlated with greater personal stigma and perceived stigma. Higher personal stigma was also significantly correlated with being male, unemployed and good family function. CONCLUSION: Concerningly high levels of stigmatizing beliefs towards depression were prevalent among the public. This may be a reason why people with mental disorders do not seek assistance. This highlights the importance of the need for health education and promotion activities. Findings from this study suggest that targeted, culturally appropriate education programs are needed to improve knowledge about depression in the broader community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.comppsych.2019.152152

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Differences among subgroups of people with depression, as well as variations in the degree of illness severity and duration, and the heterogeneous expression of clinical symptoms among those tested may contribute to the observed variance, though there is so far no consensus on the bases for these results.

    “Differences among subgroups of people with depression, as well as variations in the degree of illness severity and duration, and the heterogeneous expression of clinical symptoms among those tested may contribute to the observed variance, 317,318 though there is so far no consensus on the bases for these results.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Zhang J, Wu ZY, Fang G, Li J, Han BX, Chen ZY. Development of the Chinese age norms of CES-D in urban area. Chinese Mental Health Journal 2010;24(2):139-43. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6729.2010.02.015. · DOI
  2. Yang TT, Tong YQ, Yin XX, Lu ZX, Gong YH. Evaluation of Morisky Medication Adher- ence Scale and Family APGAR applied to patients with tuberculosis. Chinese Journal of Social Medicine 2016;33(6):580-2. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5625. 2016.06.024. · DOI
  3. Wen LT, Pan SM, Tang XS, Chen X, Ma YZ, Qiu CQ. Public's attitude towards depres- sion and their influencing factors. Chin J Health Psychol 2017;25(5):670-3. https:// doi.org/10.13342/j.cnki.cjhp.2017.05.009. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Yang, B. X., Stone, T. E., Wang, X. Q., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., & Jiao, S. F.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • Chiang Mai University (TH)
  • Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Xiao Qin
Venue
Comprehensive Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
97
Pages
152152
ISSN
0010-440X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993633745
Cited by
118
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Comprehensive Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
depression stigma, personal stigma, perceived stigma, Chinese population, age differences, gender differences, unemployment, family functioning, help-seeking, mental health education, stigma reduction interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, China, Depression, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Perception, Public Opinion, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Stereotyping, Prevalence, Young Adult, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review