Cited by 64Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in children older than early neonates

Abstract

It has been reported that nonsurgical correction of auricular deformities is not effective except in early neonates. We have succeeded in nonsurgical correction using thermoplastic splints for congenital auricular deformities on 50 ears of 45 patients without severe hypoplasia in children older than 1 year. Details of the types of ears we attempted to treat were 26 cryptotias, 5 lop ears, 5 Stahl's ears, 3 prominent ears, 3 shell ears, and 8 other miscellaneous conditions. The patients were between 1 and 14 years of age with an average age of 3.6 years. Our results were categorized as follows: excellent (the auricle was delicately corrected into a desirable form and satisfied the patient), improved (the auricle was corrected into a rough form that did not attain to a desirable shape and an irregular form still remained; however, its improvement satisfied the patient), recurrent (the auricle was initially corrected but the deformity recurred), not improved (the auricle was not corrected to the desired form and the result did not satisfy the patient), and gave up (the patient gave up before treatment could be completed). In our results, the average period of splint application was 2.1 months. In 27 of the 50 cases, the treated ears were excellent. Eleven ear cases showed improvement. Six cases showed recurrence. Three cases did not improve. Three patients gave up treatment. It is suggested that nonsurgical auricular correction is possible in almost all children, even if they are not early neonates, when corrections are made continuously and gradually.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006534-199804040-00004

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Yotsuyanagi et al.'s report, children older than 3 years of age did not tolerate molding therapy well and had a relatively high recurrence rate (12%).

    “however, children older than 3 years of age did not tolerate the molding therapy well and the recurrence rate was also relatively high (12%).”
  • Yotsuyanagi et al. reported successful correction in patients up to 14 years of age.

    “Yotsuyanagi et al. [12] reported successful correction in patients up to 14 years of age;”
  • Some articles have concluded molding to be effective up until an older age, countering the theory that neonatal treatment is most effective.

    “Some articles, however, have concluded molding to be effective up until an older age, countering this theory.47–51”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yotsuyanagi, T., Yokoi, K., Urushidate, S., & Sawada, Y.
Affiliations
Hirosaki University (JP)
Venue
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery
Published
1998-04
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
907-914
ISSN
0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4238223060
Cited by
64
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
congenital auricular deformities, pediatric patients, ear deformity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review