Cited by 44Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCongenital Ear and Nasal AnomaliesCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments

Tape attachment therapy for correction of congenital malformations of the auricle: clinical and experimental studies

Muraoka, Michinari, Nakai, Yoshiaki, Sasaki, Takaharu, Ohashi, Yoshihiro, Maruoka, Kenichi, Furukawa, Masayoshi·1985·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

After the auricular cartilage of 5-week-old rabbits was bent and fixed by suture, the cartilage increased in thickness in a short period of time. The thickness was maximal 6 weeks later and slightly greater than that of the control cartilage 12 weeks later. At this stage, the auricle was fixed in curved form. There was no difference in the morphology of cartilage cells between the bent group and the control. Tape attachment therapy is very simple. We propose that surgical treatment should be designed after a few months of tape attachment therapy. In the present work, the effect of taping was graded good in 4 cases of Stahl ear, 1 case of atypical cryptotia, and 2 other cases. In 2 cases of cup ear the result was fair, but this deformity with marked auricular aplasia was not curable by this conservative treatment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1288/00005537-198502000-00008

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cryptotia ear is usually an upper auricle deformity that is difficult for parents to detect, and the treatment duration is longer when it is diagnosed at an older age.

    “The cryptotia ear is usually an upper auricle deformity that is difficult for parents to detect, and the treatment duration is longer when it is diagnosed at an older age (13–15).”

    From Using Ear Molding to Treat Congenital Auricular Deformities (2021) · cites this paper as [13]

  • Some articles have concluded molding to be effective up until an older age, countering the theory that neonatal treatment is most effective.

    “Some articles, however, have concluded molding to be effective up until an older age, countering this theory.47–51”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muraoka, M., Nakai, Y., Sasaki, T., Ohashi, Y., Maruoka, K., & Furukawa, M.
Affiliations
Osaka City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Muraoka, Michinari
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1985-02
Volume
95
Issue
2
Pages
167-176
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2019858149
Cited by
44
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
auricular cartilage, cryptotia, rabbit model, conservative treatment
MeSH terms
Animals, Bandages, Child, Preschool, Ear Cartilage, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Immobilization, Infant, Male, Rabbits, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review