Cited by 133Balance, Gait, and Falls PreventionContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

A speedy solution for balance and gait analysis: angular velocity measured at the centre of body mass

Allum, John HJ, Carpenter, Mark G·2005·Current Opinion in Neurology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Falls are a serious problem for the elderly and others prone to fall. In particular, those over 65 years of age will suffer at least one fall a year and as a result will need cost-intensive medical treatment. Under these circumstances, an optimal clinical pathway should first identify those with a tendency to fall, second, pinpoint the disease-specific deficits in balance control and walking patterns, and third, offer the possibility through focused biofeedback training to reduce the number of falls suffered. This review describes new methods of assessing balance control in both static and dynamic balance conditions and their applications for balance rehabilitation. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological advances and applied research have shown that body-worn sensors measuring angular velocity (gyroscopes) or the acceleration of the trunk can effectively quantify balance during stance and gait tasks, and can be used to detect potential fallers and discriminate between different balance disorders. Standing on foam support reveals balance deficits regardless of the underlying disease. Disease-specific balance deficits can be characterized by the pattern of trunk movements between various semi-stance and gait tasks. Angular velocity sensors have recently been shown to provide highly relevant information for use as biofeedback, or as an ambulatory device to record balance and gait performance over long periods of time in both clinical and natural living conditions. SUMMARY: Angular velocity sensors can provide balance-relevant information directly to the clinician, and provide an important improvement on the complicated and time/cost-intensive techniques of traditional balance measurement systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00019052-200502000-00005

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allum, J. H., & Carpenter, M. G.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Basel (CH)
Corresponding author
Allum, John HJ
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurology
Published
2005-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
1350-7540 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2052215988
Cited by
133
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 17
FWCI
21.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
balance assessment, gait analysis, angular velocity sensor, gyroscope, wearable sensors, fall risk detection, balance rehabilitation, biofeedback, trunk acceleration, balance disorders, falls in older adults, ambulatory monitoring
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Accidental Falls, Aged, Biofeedback, Psychology, Postural Balance, Gait, Humans, Posture, Proprioception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review