Cited by 17Diet and metabolism studiesNutritional Studies and DietDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Insulin resistance, low-fat diets, and low-carbohydrate diets: time to test new menus

Schwenke, Dawn Colleen·2005·Current Opinion in Lipidology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Insulin resistance increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and the risk of cardiovascular disease increases further once diabetes has developed. As insulin resistance is a precursor to diabetes, it is critically important to identify cost-effective means, such as dietary changes, by which to reduce insulin resistance. The purpose of this review is to evaluate recent findings concerning dietary composition and insulin resistance, with particular focus on low-fat diets compared with the currently popular low-carbohydrate diets. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent findings indicate little support for the value of low-carbohydrate diets as therapies for insulin resistance. In contrast, the limited data available suggest that the higher fat content of typical low-carbohydrate diets may exacerbate insulin resistance in the long term. Preliminary data indicate that proteins from different sources may have differing effects on insulin resistance. Preliminary data also suggest the potential value of whole grains, fruits and vegetables in therapeutic diets to reduce insulin resistance. SUMMARY: Current evidence supports the inclusion of whole grains, fruits and vegetables, and lean sources of animal proteins including low-fat dairy products in dietary therapies for insulin resistance. Those who wish to follow a low-carbohydrate diet should be encouraged to follow a new menu low in fat, and with most of the protein derived from plant sources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00041433-200502000-00010

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • An important difference between the Mediterranean and ADA diets is likely to be the content of MUFAs, which has been shown to affect lipid profile, insulin sensitivity, and postprandial glucose concentrations.

    “An important difference between the Mediterranean and ADA diets is likely to be the content of MUFAs, which has been shown to have an impact on the lipd profile (54,55), insulin sensitivity (56-58), and postprandial glucose concentrations (59).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwenke, D. C.
Affiliations
Carl T. Hayden Veterans Affairs Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Schwenke, Dawn Colleen
Venue
Current Opinion in Lipidology
Published
2005-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
55-60
ISSN
0957-9672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062702621
Cited by
17
References
43
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Lipidology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
insulin resistance, low-fat diet, low-carbohydrate diet, diet composition, diabetes prevention, cardiovascular risk, whole grains, fruits and vegetables, dietary protein, plant proteins, low-fat dairy, dietary fat intake
MeSH terms
Animals, Diet, Diet Therapy, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Proteins, Fatty Acids, Unsaturated, Humans, Insulin Resistance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review